Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) 15.6" VS Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16" (Ryzen AI 5 340 / 16GB RAM / 512GB)

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) 15.6″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ have notable differences in design specifications. The Acer Nitro V 15 weighs 2110 g, making it heavier than the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5, which weighs 1760 g. The difference in weight may be noticeable for users who prioritize portability.

Both laptops feature a backlit keyboard, which is convenient for typing in low-light conditions. However, neither model uses a fanless design, meaning they likely rely on active cooling systems. In terms of size, the Acer Nitro V 15 is 362 mm wide, 239 mm high, and 23 mm thick, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 is slightly wider at 365 mm, taller at 250 mm, and thinner at 16 mm.

When it comes to volume, the Acer Nitro V 15 has a larger total volume at 1989.914 cm³ compared to the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5's 1460 cm³. Neither product is weather-sealed or rugged, so users should take care when using them in environments where durability or resistance to elements is a concern.

The display specifications of the Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 show some key differences. The Acer model features a 15.6″ screen with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 px, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has a slightly larger 16″ display with a higher resolution of 1920 x 1200 px. Despite these differences, both displays have the same pixel density of 141 ppi, meaning the clarity of the display should be similar.

Both laptops use LCD, LED-backlit, IPS displays and lack touch-screen functionality. However, the Acer Nitro V 15 offers a higher refresh rate of 165Hz, which can be beneficial for smoother motion in gaming or fast-paced tasks, whereas the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has a more standard refresh rate of 60Hz.

Another notable difference is that the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has an anti-reflection coating, which the Acer Nitro V 15 lacks. This coating can help reduce glare from ambient light, improving visibility in bright environments. Both models support up to four displays, providing flexibility for multi-monitor setups.

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 differ significantly in performance specifications. Both models come with 16GB of RAM, but the Acer Nitro V 15 has a larger internal storage capacity of 1024GB, compared to the 512GB offered by the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5. Both devices use flash storage and feature NVMe SSDs, ensuring fast data access.

When it comes to the CPU, the Acer Nitro V 15 has a more powerful setup, with 6 cores running at 2.6 GHz and 8 additional threads at 1.9 GHz, totaling 20 threads. The Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has a less complex CPU, with 3 cores running at 2 GHz and 3 cores at 2 GHz, totaling 12 threads. The Acer's higher thread count and clock speeds suggest it may be better suited for more demanding tasks.

In terms of GPU, the Acer Nitro V 15 has a GPU clock speed of 952 MHz and a turbo speed of 1455 MHz. Meanwhile, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has a lower GPU clock speed of 400 MHz, but a higher turbo speed of 2900 MHz. Additionally, the Acer's CPU can turbo boost up to 5.4GHz, compared to the Lenovo's 4.8GHz. Both devices use PCI Express (PCIe) version 4, but the Acer's semiconductor size is 5 nm, while the Lenovo uses a slightly smaller 4 nm semiconductor. The Acer also supports a maximum memory of 64GB, whereas the Lenovo supports up to 32GB.

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 have different PassMark benchmark results, reflecting their overall performance. The Acer Nitro V 15 has a PassMark result of 27599, which is higher than the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5's result of 20210. This indicates that the Acer performs better in multi-core tasks and overall system performance.

However, when looking at the single-core PassMark results, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 scores slightly higher at 3882 compared to the Acer Nitro V 15's score of 3746. This suggests that, for tasks that rely more heavily on single-core performance, the Lenovo might have a small edge.

Overall, the Acer Nitro V 15 outperforms the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 in multi-core performance, while the Lenovo performs slightly better in single-core tasks.

The connectivity options of the Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 show both similarities and differences. Both laptops support Wi-Fi and have HDMI outputs. The Acer Nitro V 15 supports Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 4, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 offers Wi-Fi 7, Wi-Fi 6E, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 4, providing more advanced Wi-Fi options.

In terms of USB ports, the Acer Nitro V 15 features 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-C port, 3 USB 3.2 Gen 1 USB-A ports, and no USB 4 ports. The Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-C ports, 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 USB-A ports, and also no USB 4 ports. Both laptops support USB Type-C, but the Lenovo provides more USB-C ports.

When it comes to other features, the Acer Nitro V 15 has an RJ45 port, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 does not. The Lenovo model, however, has an external memory slot, which the Acer does not provide. Both laptops support Bluetooth, with the Acer having version 5.1 and the Lenovo having the more recent 5.4. Both models also support AirPlay, but neither includes a VGA connector or mini DisplayPort outputs.

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 differ in their battery specifications. The Acer model comes with a 76 Wh battery, while the Lenovo model has a smaller 60 Wh battery. This suggests that the Acer may offer a longer battery life, though actual usage will depend on various factors such as power consumption.

Additionally, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing users to charge devices even when the laptop is in sleep mode. The Acer Nitro V 15, on the other hand, does not have this feature. Both laptops lack a MagSafe power adapter, so neither offers this particular charging option.

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 have several similarities and differences in their features. Both laptops have stereo speakers and a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, making them suitable for audio playback. However, the Acer supports ray tracing and DLSS, which are important features for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks, while the Lenovo does not support these technologies.

In terms of biometric security, the Acer Nitro V 15 includes a fingerprint scanner, but the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 does not. The Lenovo does offer 3D facial recognition, a feature not present on the Acer model. The Acer also has only one microphone, whereas the Lenovo includes two microphones for improved audio capture.

Both models have a front camera, but neither includes advanced features like voice commands, an S/PDIF Out port, or a gyroscope. Both laptops also lack GPS, accelerometer, compass, and optical disc drives, indicating that neither is designed for use with older media formats or for outdoor navigation. Dolby Atmos is absent on both devices as well.

The Acer Nitro V 15 (2025) and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 exhibit differences in several key technical specifications. The Acer model has a clock multiplier of 26, while the Lenovo model has a lower multiplier of 20. Both products feature a thermal design power (TDP) that reflects their energy consumption, with the Acer having a TDP of 45W and the Lenovo a lower 28W. This difference in TDP could indicate varying power and thermal management between the two devices.

In terms of graphics, the Acer Nitro V 15 is equipped with the Iris Xe Graphics 96EU, which features 96 GPU execution units, a significant advantage in terms of graphics performance with 3328 shading units. In comparison, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 uses the Radeon 840M with 8 GPU execution units and 512 shading units. The Acer also has more render output units (ROPs) at 32 compared to the Lenovo's 8, suggesting that the Acer may perform better in graphics-intensive tasks.

Both laptops use two memory channels, support integrated graphics, and are based on big.LITTLE technology. The Acer supports ECC memory, while the Lenovo does not. The L2 and L3 cache of the Acer are 11.5 MB and 24 MB, respectively, while the Lenovo has 6 MB and 16 MB of L2 and L3 cache. Regarding RAM speed, the Acer supports a maximum of 5200 MHz, while the Lenovo supports up to 8000 MHz. Both models have the same OpenGL version (4.6) and share similar instruction sets, including SSE 4.2, AVX, and AES, but the Acer supports OpenCL version 3, while the Lenovo supports OpenCL version 2.1.