Amazfit Balance 2 VS Apple Watch Ultra 3

When comparing the design features of the Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3, both offer a similar OLED/AMOLED display technology. The Amazfit Balance 2 has a 1.5″ screen with a resolution of 480 x 480 px and a pixel density of 323 ppi, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 has a larger 1.98″ screen with a higher resolution of 422 x 514 px and a slightly better pixel density of 326 ppi. Both devices feature an Always-On Display, touch screens, and sapphire glass for added durability.

In terms of water resistance, both watches are waterproof with a 10 ATM rating, but the Amazfit Balance 2 has an IP68 ingress protection rating, whereas the Apple Watch Ultra 3 only has an IPX6 rating, meaning it’s more resistant to dust and water in the case of the Amazfit model. The depth rating for waterproofing also differs, with the Amazfit Balance 2 being rated for 45 m and the Apple Watch Ultra 3 rated for 100 m.

When it comes to size and weight, the Amazfit Balance 2 is slightly smaller and lighter, with a thickness of 12.3 mm, a weight of 43 g, and dimensions of 47.4 x 47.4 mm. The Apple Watch Ultra 3 is thicker at 12 mm, heavier at 61.8 g, and slightly larger at 49 mm x 44 mm. Both devices have replaceable watch bands and do not feature branded damage-resistant glass, though the Amazfit Balance 2 has a slightly smaller volume at 27.6 cm³ compared to the Apple Watch Ultra 3's 25.87 cm³.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 both come equipped with a wide array of sensors for tracking health and activity. Both devices feature sensors to monitor blood oxygenation levels, heart rate, GPS, accelerometer, temperature, compass, barometer, and gyroscope. This makes them nearly identical in terms of the core sensors for fitness and health tracking.

However, both devices are missing a cadence sensor, meaning they cannot specifically track the rate of pedaling for cycling or the stride frequency in running. Additionally, neither model includes a sensor for monitoring perspiration, so users won't have sweat detection features on either watch.

Overall, the sensor suite on both the Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 is extensive and well-suited for a range of fitness tracking needs, with no significant differences between the two products in this category.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 both offer a comprehensive set of features for activity tracking. Both models track sleep, distance, steps taken, pace, and elevation, and they provide sleep reports. Additionally, they both automatically detect activities, have a route tracker, multi-sport mode, exercise tagging, and a stroke counter for swimming, making them similar in functionality for fitness and sports tracking.

However, the Amazfit Balance 2 has an additional feature for tracking calorie intake, which the Apple Watch Ultra 3 lacks. On the other hand, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 does not support golf activity tracking, a feature present in the Amazfit Balance 2. Both models are designed for diving, ensuring they are suited for underwater activities.

In summary, both watches offer a robust set of activity tracking features, but the Amazfit Balance 2 includes additional calorie intake tracking and golf support, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 lacks these features.

The connectivity features of the Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 show some similarities and a few key differences. Both watches are compatible with iOS and Android devices, although the Apple Watch Ultra 3 is not compatible with Android, while the Amazfit Balance 2 is. Both devices also support Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) and NFC, allowing for wireless connections and transactions. The Bluetooth versions differ slightly, with the Amazfit Balance 2 supporting Bluetooth 5.2 and the Apple Watch Ultra 3 supporting Bluetooth 5.3, which offers slightly improved performance in terms of range and efficiency.

A key difference between the two is that the Apple Watch Ultra 3 includes a cellular module, enabling standalone cellular connectivity, while the Amazfit Balance 2 does not have this feature. Additionally, neither watch supports ANT+, which is typically used for connecting to certain fitness devices.

Overall, the connectivity options of both watches are solid, with the Apple Watch Ultra 3 offering cellular capabilities and a newer Bluetooth version, while the Amazfit Balance 2 provides broader Android compatibility and a slightly lower Bluetooth version.

The battery performance of the Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 differ significantly. The Amazfit Balance 2 offers a much longer battery life, lasting up to 21 days on a full charge, compared to the Apple Watch Ultra 3's 1.75 days. In power save mode, the Amazfit Balance 2 can last for 67 hours, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 offers 72 hours in the same mode, which is slightly longer.

Both devices have rechargeable batteries, but the Amazfit Balance 2 does not support wireless charging, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 does offer this feature. Neither device has a solar power battery or a removable battery.

In summary, the Amazfit Balance 2 excels in regular battery life, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 offers a shorter lifespan but benefits from wireless charging and a longer power save mode duration.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 both offer a comprehensive set of features aimed at health monitoring and daily convenience. Both models track HRV (heart rate variability), measure VO2 max, and resting heart rate, and offer fast/slow heart rate notifications. They can both be used to answer calls, locate your phone, and provide call control and notifications. Additionally, both devices feature a silent alarm, vibrating alerts, a stopwatch, and voice commands. Both watches have internal storage, with the Amazfit Balance 2 offering 32GB and the Apple Watch Ultra 3 offering 64GB.

There are a few notable differences between the two. The Apple Watch Ultra 3 has irregular heart rate warnings, ECG technology, and fall detection, none of which are available on the Amazfit Balance 2. On the other hand, the Amazfit Balance 2 lacks the irregular heart rate warnings but has the same GPS speed, built-in camera remote function, and 1-year warranty period as the Apple Watch Ultra 3. Both watches have one microphone and no front camera.

Overall, both models have similar core features but the Apple Watch Ultra 3 adds some advanced health monitoring capabilities like ECG and fall detection that the Amazfit Balance 2 does not have. The Amazfit Balance 2 offers the same essential functions, with a focus on longer battery life and a smaller internal storage capacity.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 both provide a comprehensive suite of features through their respective apps. Both devices offer activity reports, inactivity alerts, calorie counting, goal setting, achievements, and an exercise diary. Additionally, both apps are free, ad-free, and allow for personalization. They also support routes, voice feedback, music playback, fertile window notifications, maps, and the prediction of ovulation and start dates for periods.

However, there are a couple of key differences. The Amazfit Balance 2 app includes coaching, temperature tracking, and a barcode scanner, which the Apple Watch Ultra 3 app does not. On the other hand, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 lacks the coaching feature but matches the Amazfit Balance 2 in terms of temperature tracking and other health-related features. Both models also track water intake and weight, and neither app includes a barcode scanner.

In summary, the apps for both devices offer similar core functionalities, but the Amazfit Balance 2 has additional coaching and barcode scanning capabilities, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 lacks coaching but still provides all other key features related to activity tracking and health monitoring.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 are quite similar in the miscellaneous features they offer. Both models include a battery level indicator, auto pause, passcode, compatibility with smart scales, and the ability to connect to external heart rate monitors. They also lack an external memory slot, are not compatible with Windows or Mac OS X, and do not have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack.

In essence, both watches have nearly identical features in this category. There are no differences between the two in terms of compatibility with smart devices or their general connectivity options. The functionality provided is consistent across both devices.

Overall, the miscellaneous features of both the Amazfit Balance 2 and Apple Watch Ultra 3 are almost identical, with neither device offering additional or unique capabilities in this area.