Amazfit Balance 2 VS Google Pixel Watch 4

The Amazfit Balance 2 features a 1.5″ OLED/AMOLED display with a resolution of 480 x 480 px and a pixel density of 323 ppi, which is slightly higher than the Google Pixel Watch 4's 1.4″ OLED/AMOLED display with a resolution of 456 x 456 px and 320 ppi. While both displays are AMOLED technology, the Balance 2 offers a larger screen size and slightly sharper pixel density. Both devices support Always-On Display functionality. However, the Pixel Watch 4 has a slightly higher resolution but with a smaller display, resulting in a marginally lower pixel density.

Regarding water resistance, both watches are waterproof and have an IP68 rating, which makes them resistant to dust and water immersion. The Amazfit Balance 2 has a higher ATM rating of 10 ATM, meaning it is rated for a depth of 45 meters, whereas the Pixel Watch 4 has an ATM rating of 5 ATM, allowing it to withstand depths up to 50 meters. However, in practical terms, the difference in water depth is minimal for everyday use.

As for physical design, both watches have replaceable bands, with the Amazfit Balance 2 being slightly larger in overall size, measuring 47.4 mm in height and width, compared to the Pixel Watch 4's 45 mm dimensions. The Balance 2 is also a bit thicker at 12.3 mm and heavier at 43 g, compared to the Pixel Watch 4's matching thickness but lighter weight of 36.7 g. The Amazfit Balance 2 also has sapphire glass for additional protection, while the Pixel Watch 4 does not have branded damage-resistant glass.

Both the Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 are equipped with a comprehensive set of sensors. Both devices monitor blood oxygenation levels, have a heart rate monitor, include GPS, and feature accelerometers. Additionally, both watches are fitted with temperature sensors, compasses, barometers, and gyroscopes, ensuring a wide range of functionality for various health and activity tracking needs.

One key difference between the two models is in the presence of a cadence sensor. The Amazfit Balance 2 does not include this sensor, while the Google Pixel Watch 4 does. This gives the Pixel Watch 4 a potential edge for users focused on tracking cycling or running cadence.

Another commonality is that neither watch monitors perspiration, which is a feature that is not present in either model.

Both the Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 offer a similar set of core activity tracking features. Both watches track sleep, distance, steps taken, and pace, and they both provide sleep reports and can automatically detect activities. Both also include route tracking and elevation tracking for more detailed outdoor activity monitoring, along with calorie intake tracking for users focused on nutrition.

The Amazfit Balance 2 stands out with a few additional features. It includes a multi-sport mode, which the Pixel Watch 4 lacks. Additionally, the Balance 2 offers a stroke counter for swimming and is designed for both diving and golf, whereas the Pixel Watch 4 does not have these capabilities.

In comparison, the Google Pixel Watch 4 lacks the multi-sport mode and stroke counter for swimming, as well as specific design features for diving and golf. However, both watches provide exercise tagging, ensuring users can log their workouts effectively.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 differ in their connectivity features. The Amazfit Balance 2 does not include a cellular module, while the Pixel Watch 4 has cellular capabilities, allowing for standalone communication without needing to be connected to a phone. Both devices are compatible with Android, but the Balance 2 is also compatible with iOS, while the Pixel Watch 4 is not.

In terms of Bluetooth, the Balance 2 supports Bluetooth version 5.2, whereas the Pixel Watch 4 supports a newer Bluetooth version 6. Both watches support Wi-Fi, but the Balance 2 is limited to Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), while the Pixel Watch 4 supports a wider range of Wi-Fi standards, including Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), offering greater flexibility for wireless connections.

Both watches include NFC for contactless payments and data transfer, so they are similar in that aspect.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 differ significantly in battery life. The Balance 2 boasts a much longer battery life of 21 days, compared to the Pixel Watch 4's 1.6 days. The Balance 2 also features a larger battery with a capacity of 658 mAh, while the Pixel Watch 4's battery has a capacity of 455 mAh. In terms of power save mode, the Balance 2 can last up to 67 hours, whereas the Pixel Watch 4 can last up to 72 hours.

Both watches have a rechargeable battery and do not support wireless charging. Neither watch has a solar power battery nor a removable battery.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 share several key features, including HRV tracking, VO2 max measurement, resting heart rate monitoring, fast/slow heart rate notifications, and readiness level displays. Both watches can be used to answer calls, locate your phone, provide call control, and deliver notifications. They also both feature silent alarms, vibrating alerts, stopwatches, and voice command capabilities. Additionally, both watches come with 32GB of internal storage and a built-in camera remote control function.

There are a few differences between the two models. The Google Pixel Watch 4 offers irregular heart rate warnings, which the Amazfit Balance 2 does not. The Pixel Watch 4 also includes ECG technology and fall detection, whereas these features are absent on the Balance 2. On the other hand, the Amazfit Balance 2 has a faster GPS acquisition time compared to the Pixel Watch 4, which does not offer faster GPS acquisition.

Both devices come with a 1-year warranty period, ensuring similar coverage for either model.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 offer nearly identical features when it comes to their app and software capabilities. Both devices provide activity reports, inactivity alerts, calorie counting, goal setting, achievements, and a free app. They both include an exercise diary, coaching, temperature tracking, period notifications, support for routes, calendar syncing, voice feedback, music playback, fertile window notifications, maps, ovulation predictions, start date predictions, widgets, personalization, water intake tracking, weight tracking, and live tracking.

Both watches also lack a barcode scanner in their apps, so users won’t be able to scan items directly through the watch’s app. The software and app experiences are otherwise identical, with both devices offering a very similar set of features to support health and activity tracking.

There are no distinguishing factors in the app and software capabilities between the two products, as both models share the same features.

The Amazfit Balance 2 and Google Pixel Watch 4 share identical specifications in the miscellaneous category. Both watches feature a battery level indicator, a passcode option for security, and are not compatible with Windows or Mac OS X. Additionally, neither watch includes an external memory slot or a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack.

These similarities ensure that both devices have a comparable set of features in this category, with no significant differences between them.