TurboVS
AMD Ryzen 3 210
AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen 3 210 AMD Ryzen 7 250

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250. Both processors share the same 4nm architecture, 28W TDP, and DDR5 memory support, making them siblings on paper — but their differences in core configuration, cache size, and integrated graphics power tell a more nuanced story. Whether you care about multi-threaded workloads, gaming on integrated graphics, or everyday efficiency, this comparison will help you decide which chip fits your needs.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors.
  • ✓ Integrated graphics are available on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W.
  • ✓ Both processors are manufactured using a 4nm semiconductor process.
  • ✓ The maximum CPU temperature is 100°C on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors use PCIe version 4.
  • ✓ 64-bit support is present on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Neither the AMD Ryzen 3 210 nor the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ The integrated GPU base clock speed is 800 MHz on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors support DirectX 12.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 support up to 4 displays.
  • ✓ OpenGL version 4.6 is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ OpenCL version 2.1 is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both processors feature 2 memory channels.
  • ✓ The maximum memory amount supported is 256GB on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ ECC memory support is not available on either the AMD Ryzen 3 210 or the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors share the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Multithreading is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ The NX bit feature is present on both the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.

Main Differences

  • • CPU speed is 1 x 3.6 & 3 x 2.8 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 8 x 3.3 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • CPU threads total 8 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 16 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Turbo clock speed reaches 4.7GHz on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 5.1GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • L2 cache is 4 MB on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 8 MB on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • L3 cache is 8 MB on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 16 MB on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • big.LITTLE technology is used on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 but is not used on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The clock multiplier is 30 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 33 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The PassMark result (multi-core) is 13175 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 23408 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The PassMark result (single-core) is 3652 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 3733 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The integrated GPU is the Radeon 740M on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the Radeon 780M on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • GPU turbo clock speed is 2500 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 2700 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Texture mapping units (TMUs) number 16 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 48 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Render output units (ROPs) total 8 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 32 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Shading units number 256 on the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and 768 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 3 210

AMD Ryzen 3 210

AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen 7 250

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Laptop, Desktop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 28W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

In terms of general characteristics, the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 are remarkably alike. Both processors are designed for use in Laptop and Desktop platforms, share an identical 28W TDP, are built on the same 4nm process node, and top out at the same 100°C junction temperature. Each chip also includes integrated graphics, supports 64-bit computing, and uses PCIe 4.0 — meaning neither holds a platform-level connectivity advantage over the other.

The shared 4nm fabrication process is worth noting: it represents a modern, power-efficient manufacturing node that enables respectable performance density without excessive heat output. The 28W TDP makes both chips suitable for thermally constrained environments like thin-and-light laptops, while still being viable in compact desktop builds. The presence of integrated graphics on both means neither requires a discrete GPU for basic display output or light workloads — a practical convenience for system builders.

Based strictly on the general info specs provided, these two processors are completely tied. Every metric in this category is identical. Any differentiation between the Ryzen 3 210 and Ryzen 7 250 will need to come from other specification groups — such as CPU performance cores, clock speeds, or cache — rather than from their shared platform-level characteristics.

Performance:
CPU speed 1 x 3.6 & 3 x 2.8 GHz 8 x 3.3 GHz
CPU threads 8 threads 16 threads
turbo clock speed 4.7GHz 5.1GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 4 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 8 MB 16 MB
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✓ ✕
clock multiplier 30 33

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 have distinct differences when it comes to performance specifications. Starting with CPU speed, the Ryzen 3 210 has a configuration of 1 core at 3.6 GHz and 3 cores at 2.8 GHz, while the Ryzen 7 250 features 8 cores, each running at 3.3 GHz. This shows that the Ryzen 7 250 has more cores, but the Ryzen 3 210 has a higher clock speed on fewer cores.

In terms of turbo clock speed, the Ryzen 3 210 reaches up to 4.7 GHz, whereas the Ryzen 7 250 can boost to 5.1 GHz, providing slightly higher peak speeds. Both processors have the same L2 cache size of 4 MB for the Ryzen 3 210 and 8 MB for the Ryzen 7 250. However, their L3 cache differs, with the Ryzen 3 210 offering 8 MB and the Ryzen 7 250 doubling this to 16 MB.

Both processors differ when it comes to threads: the Ryzen 3 210 has 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 250 supports 16 threads. The Ryzen 3 210 also uses big.LITTLE technology, which the Ryzen 7 250 does not. Finally, both processors have locked multipliers, but their clock multipliers vary, with the Ryzen 3 210 set at 30 and the Ryzen 7 250 at 33.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 13175 23408
PassMark result (single) 3652 3733

When comparing the PassMark benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250, there is a clear difference in overall performance. The Ryzen 3 210 has a total PassMark result of 13175, while the Ryzen 7 250 achieves a significantly higher result of 23408. This shows the Ryzen 7 250 delivers considerably better overall performance based on these benchmark tests.

For single-threaded performance, the Ryzen 3 210 scores 3652, while the Ryzen 7 250 is slightly higher at 3733. Although the difference in single-thread performance is not as large as the total score difference, the Ryzen 7 250 still leads in this category.

Overall, the Ryzen 7 250 outperforms the Ryzen 3 210 in both total and single-threaded PassMark benchmarks, reflecting its higher performance capabilities in these tests.

Integrated graphics:
GPU clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
GPU name Radeon 740M Radeon 780M
GPU turbo 2500 MHz 2700 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 2.1
texture mapping units (TMUs) 16 48
render output units (ROPs) 8 32
shading units 256 768

The integrated graphics of the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 show some differences in their specifications. Both processors feature a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, but the Ryzen 3 210 is equipped with a Radeon 740M GPU, while the Ryzen 7 250 uses a more advanced Radeon 780M GPU. The GPU turbo speed also differs, with the Ryzen 3 210 reaching 2500 MHz, compared to the Ryzen 7 250's 2700 MHz.

Both products support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, so there is no difference in terms of these graphics-related software standards. The number of supported displays is also the same for both, at 4 displays.

However, the Ryzen 7 250 has significantly more texture mapping units (TMUs), with 48, compared to the Ryzen 3 210’s 16. Similarly, the Ryzen 7 250 has 32 render output units (ROPs), while the Ryzen 3 210 only has 8. The difference is also noticeable in the number of shading units: 768 for the Ryzen 7 250, versus 256 for the Ryzen 3 210.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 7500 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 256GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✕

The memory specifications for the AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 are identical. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz, DDR memory version 5, and 2 memory channels. The maximum memory amount for both is 256GB, and neither processor supports ECC memory.

Since both products share the same memory specifications, users can expect similar memory performance and capabilities from both the Ryzen 3 210 and the Ryzen 7 250 in this regard.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✓
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 share identical features in this comparison group. Both processors support the same instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. Additionally, both products are capable of using multithreading and include the NX bit feature for enhanced security.

Since these features are identical across both processors, users can expect the same level of support for various instruction sets and multithreading capabilities, as well as similar security features like the NX bit.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After a thorough review of all specifications, a clear picture emerges for each processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 is the stronger performer across the board, delivering 16 threads, a higher 5.1GHz turbo clock, doubled cache at every level, and a dramatically more capable Radeon 780M integrated GPU with 768 shading units — making it the go-to choice for demanding multitasking, content creation, and light gaming. The AMD Ryzen 3 210, on the other hand, leverages big.LITTLE technology for intelligent core scheduling and still offers respectable single-core performance, making it a sensible option for users with lighter, everyday workloads who want an efficient and cost-conscious solution. Both chips share identical memory support, TDP, and feature sets, so the decision ultimately comes down to how much processing and graphical headroom your workload demands.

AMD Ryzen 3 210
Buy AMD Ryzen 3 210 if...

Choose the AMD Ryzen 3 210 if you have lighter everyday computing needs and want a chip that uses big.LITTLE technology for efficient core management at a lower performance tier.

AMD Ryzen 7 250
Buy AMD Ryzen 7 250 if...

Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 250 if you need stronger multi-threaded performance, significantly more cache, and a much more capable integrated GPU for demanding workloads or light gaming.