AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 VS AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

In terms of general specifications, the AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are, remarkably, identical across every provided data point. Both are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors, share a 28W TDP, are fabricated on a 4nm process node, include integrated graphics, support 64-bit computing, cap at a 100°C CPU temperature, and both use PCIe 4.0.

The shared 4nm process node and 28W TDP are worth contextualizing: a 4nm fabrication delivers strong power efficiency and transistor density, meaning both chips are built for modern, thermally constrained environments like thin-and-light laptops without sacrificing too much performance headroom. A 28W TDP places both squarely in the mainstream mobile/compact desktop tier — not ultra-low-power, but not a full workstation-class chip either. The identical 100°C thermal ceiling means neither has a silicon-level thermal advantage over the other.

Based strictly on this group′s data, these two processors are in a complete tie — there is no differentiator here whatsoever. Users should look to other specification groups, such as CPU performance cores, clock speeds, or AI/NPU capabilities, to identify meaningful distinctions between the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and the Ryzen AI 7 350.

The AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 differ in several key performance aspects. The Ryzen 3 Pro 210 has a CPU speed configuration of 1 core at 3.6 GHz and 3 cores at 2.8 GHz, whereas the Ryzen AI 7 350 has a CPU speed of 4 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4 cores at 2.0 GHz. This shows that the Ryzen AI 7 350 has more cores, but the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 has higher clock speeds for some of its cores.

In terms of CPU threads, the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 supports 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 supports 16 threads, indicating the latter’s greater parallel processing capability. The turbo clock speed is higher on the Ryzen AI 7 350, reaching 5 GHz compared to 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 3 Pro 210, offering a slight advantage in burst performance.

The L2 and L3 cache sizes are also different. The Ryzen 3 Pro 210 features a 4 MB L2 cache and an 8 MB L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 comes with a larger 8 MB L2 cache and a 16 MB L3 cache, which may result in better data handling and improved efficiency in larger workloads. Both processors use big.LITTLE technology, ensuring efficiency in task allocation across cores, but there is no difference in this feature between the two models.

The AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 show significant differences in their benchmark performance results. The Ryzen 3 Pro 210 has a PassMark result of 12392, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 achieves a much higher score of 34459. This indicates a substantial difference in overall processing power, with the Ryzen AI 7 350 providing greater performance under multi-threaded workloads.

In terms of single-thread performance, the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 scores 3378, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 reaches 3878. Again, the Ryzen AI 7 350 performs better, offering faster single-thread speeds compared to the Ryzen 3 Pro 210.

Overall, the Ryzen AI 7 350 outperforms the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 in both multi-thread and single-thread benchmarks, reflecting its higher processing capability in various tasks.

The integrated graphics of the AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are quite different in their specifications. The Ryzen 3 Pro 210 features a Radeon 740M GPU with a base clock speed of 800 MHz and a turbo clock speed of 2500 MHz. In comparison, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has a Radeon 860M GPU, which runs at a lower base clock speed of 400 MHz but boosts up to 3000 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, offering similar compatibility with modern graphical and computational workloads. The supported displays for each processor are the same, with both capable of handling up to 4 displays. However, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has double the texture mapping units (TMUs) at 32, compared to the Ryzen 3 Pro 210's 16 TMUs, which may contribute to better overall texture handling.

In terms of shading units, the Ryzen AI 7 350 also leads with 512 shading units, while the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 has 256 shading units. Both processors feature the same number of render output units (ROPs), with 8 in each case. These differences indicate that the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers more powerful integrated graphics overall.

The memory specifications of the AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are very similar, with only a slight difference in RAM speed. Both processors support DDR5 memory, operate with 2 memory channels, and can handle a maximum of 256 GB of RAM. Neither processor supports ECC memory, meaning they are not designed for error-correcting RAM.

When it comes to RAM speed, the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 supports a maximum speed of 7500 MHz, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 can reach a slightly higher maximum speed of 8000 MHz.

Overall, the two processors offer the same memory capabilities in terms of memory type, channels, and maximum capacity, with the only difference being the slight advantage in RAM speed for the Ryzen AI 7 350.

The AMD Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 both support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. This ensures both processors can handle a wide range of advanced computational tasks with similar efficiency in terms of supported instructions.

Both processors also use multithreading, allowing for improved parallel processing of tasks. Additionally, both models have the NX bit feature enabled, which enhances security by preventing the execution of certain types of malicious code.

In summary, the features of the Ryzen 3 Pro 210 and the Ryzen AI 7 350 are identical, with both processors offering the same instruction set support, multithreading capability, and NX bit feature.