AMD Ryzen 5 220
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230

AMD Ryzen 5 220 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230

Overview

Choosing between the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 means weighing some genuinely interesting trade-offs. Both chips share the same 4 nm process, 28W TDP, and DDR5 memory support, but they diverge in CPU architecture, integrated graphics capability, and overall benchmark performance. This comparison breaks down exactly where each processor pulls ahead, helping you decide which one suits your computing needs best.

Common Features

  • Both products are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors.
  • Integrated graphics are available on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Both CPUs have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W.
  • Both are manufactured using a 4 nm semiconductor process.
  • Both have a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C.
  • Both support PCIe version 4.
  • 64-bit support is available on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Both CPUs have 12 threads.
  • Both share a turbo clock speed of 4.9 GHz.
  • Neither the AMD Ryzen 5 220 nor the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 has an unlocked multiplier.
  • Both CPUs include 6 MB of L2 cache.
  • Both CPUs include 16 MB of L3 cache.
  • The integrated GPU clock speed is 800 MHz on both products.
  • Both support DirectX 12.
  • Both support up to 4 displays simultaneously.
  • Both support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • Both support OpenCL version 2.1.
  • Both support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz.
  • Both use DDR5 memory and support dual memory channels.
  • Both support a maximum memory amount of 256 GB.
  • ECC memory is not supported on either the AMD Ryzen 5 220 or the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Both CPUs support the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • Multithreading is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • The NX bit security feature is present on both products.

Main Differences

  • CPU speed is 2 x 3.7 & 4 x 3 GHz on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 6 x 3.5 GHz on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Big.LITTLE technology is used on AMD Ryzen 5 220 but not on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • The clock multiplier is 32 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 35 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • The PassMark result is 18272 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 20603 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • The single-core PassMark result is 3600 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 3691 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • The integrated GPU is the Radeon 740M on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the Radeon 760M on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • GPU turbo clock speed is 2800 MHz on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 2600 MHz on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Texture mapping units (TMUs) number 16 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 32 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Render output units (ROPs) number 8 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 16 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
  • Shading units number 256 on AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 512 on AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 220

AMD Ryzen 5 220

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Laptop, Desktop
Has integrated graphics
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 28W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit

When comparing the general specifications of the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230, the picture is remarkably uniform. Both processors share an identical foundation: they are designed for both laptop and desktop platforms, are built on a 4 nm semiconductor process, operate within a 28W TDP, and top out at a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C. Both also include integrated graphics, support 64-bit computing, and use PCIe 4.0.

The 4 nm node is a meaningful indicator of efficiency and transistor density — it places both chips in the modern generation of processor design, capable of delivering strong performance-per-watt relative to older manufacturing processes. The shared 28W TDP means system integrators can expect identical thermal and power budgets when designing around either chip, which is particularly relevant for thin-and-light laptops where thermal headroom is constrained.

Based strictly on the general info specs provided, these two processors are completely tied. There is no differentiator in this category — every shared metric is identical. Buyers and system designers should look to other specification groups, such as clock speeds, core counts, or cache sizes, to identify any meaningful distinction between the Ryzen 5 220 and the Ryzen 5 Pro 230.

Performance:
CPU speed 2 x 3.7 & 4 x 3 GHz 6 x 3.5 GHz
CPU threads 12 threads 12 threads
turbo clock speed 4.9GHz 4.9GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier
L2 cache 6 MB 6 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Uses big.LITTLE technology
clock multiplier 32 35

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 have some differences in their CPU speed configurations. The Ryzen 5 220 features a combination of 2 cores running at 3.7 GHz and 4 cores running at 3 GHz, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 operates with 6 cores running at a consistent 3.5 GHz.

Both processors have 12 threads, which means they are capable of handling multiple tasks simultaneously. Both processors also have a turbo clock speed of 4.9 GHz, providing a performance boost when needed. The clock multiplier, however, differs: the Ryzen 5 220 uses a multiplier of 32, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 uses a multiplier of 35.

Regarding cache size, both processors offer 6 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Ryzen 5 220 supports big.LITTLE technology, which is designed to optimize power efficiency by using different cores for different tasks, but the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 does not have this feature, potentially affecting power management in different workloads.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 18272 20603
PassMark result (single) 3600 3691

The PassMark benchmark results show that the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 differ in overall performance. The Ryzen 5 220 scores a PassMark result of 18272, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 achieves a slightly higher score of 20603.

For single-threaded performance, the Ryzen 5 220 has a result of 3600, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 comes in at 3691. This indicates a small difference in performance per thread, with the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 again showing a slight advantage.

Overall, both processors have relatively close benchmark results, but the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 consistently outperforms the Ryzen 5 220 in both overall and single-threaded performance.

Integrated graphics:
GPU clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
GPU name Radeon 740M Radeon 760M
GPU turbo 2800 MHz 2600 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 2.1
texture mapping units (TMUs) 16 32
render output units (ROPs) 8 16
shading units 256 512

The integrated graphics in the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 are both based on Radeon GPUs, but with some differences in their specifications. The Ryzen 5 220 is equipped with a Radeon 740M GPU, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 features the more powerful Radeon 760M GPU.

Both products have the same GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, but the turbo boost speed differs. The Ryzen 5 220's GPU can turbo up to 2800 MHz, while the Ryzen 5 Pro 230's GPU has a slightly lower turbo speed of 2600 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, with the same number of supported displays (4) for each. However, the Ryzen 5 Pro 230 has more graphics processing resources, featuring 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), 16 render output units (ROPs), and 512 shading units. In comparison, the Ryzen 5 220 has 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 256 shading units, offering less graphical power overall.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 7500 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 256GB
Supports ECC memory

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 have identical specifications when it comes to memory. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz, DDR5 memory version, and have 2 memory channels for efficient data transfer.

In terms of maximum memory capacity, both processors support up to 256GB of RAM, providing ample space for demanding applications and workloads.

Neither processor supports ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, which is typically used for increased reliability in certain professional environments.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading
Has NX bit

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 share identical feature sets. Each processor supports the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.

Both processors also support multithreading, allowing for better parallel processing of tasks, and they include the NX bit, which helps improve security by preventing certain types of malware from executing.

There are no differences between the two processors in terms of these key features, as both provide the same set of capabilities for instruction handling, multithreading, and security.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining both processors side by side, a clear picture emerges for each use case. The AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 holds a significant edge in raw performance, posting higher PassMark scores of 20603 versus 18272, and featuring the more powerful Radeon 760M GPU with double the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs. This makes it the stronger pick for users who need better multi-core throughput and more capable integrated graphics. The AMD Ryzen 5 220, meanwhile, leverages big.LITTLE hybrid architecture for potentially smarter workload distribution, and offers a higher GPU turbo clock of 2800 MHz. Both chips are equally matched in memory support, TDP, cache, and feature sets, so your final choice should hinge on whether peak benchmark performance or hybrid CPU efficiency matters more to your specific workload.

AMD Ryzen 5 220
Buy AMD Ryzen 5 220 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen 5 220 if you value a hybrid big.LITTLE CPU architecture for flexible workload distribution and a higher GPU turbo clock speed of 2800 MHz suits your needs.

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230
Buy AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 if...

Choose the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 230 if you need stronger overall CPU and GPU performance, backed by higher PassMark scores and a significantly more capable Radeon 760M with twice the shading units, TMUs, and ROPs.