TurboVS
AMD Ryzen 5 220
AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen 5 220 AMD Ryzen 7 250

Overview

Welcome to our detailed spec comparison between the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250, two processors built on the same 4 nm architecture and sharing a 28W TDP, yet diverging in meaningful ways. In this head-to-head, we examine key battlegrounds including multi-core and single-core performance, integrated graphics capability, cache sizes, and thread counts to help you decide which chip best suits your needs.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 are available for Laptop and Desktop form factors.
  • ✓ Integrated graphics are present on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W.
  • ✓ Both processors are built on a 4 nm semiconductor process.
  • ✓ The maximum CPU temperature is 100 °C on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 use PCIe version 4.
  • ✓ 64-bit support is available on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Neither the AMD Ryzen 5 220 nor the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 feature 16 MB of L3 cache.
  • ✓ The integrated GPU base clock speed is 800 MHz on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors support DirectX 12.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 support up to 4 displays.
  • ✓ OpenGL version 4.6 is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ OpenCL version 2.1 is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz.
  • ✓ Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both processors feature 2 memory channels.
  • ✓ The maximum memory amount supported is 256 GB on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ ECC memory is not supported on either the AMD Ryzen 5 220 or AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ Both processors support the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Multithreading is supported on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • ✓ The NX bit security feature is present on both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250.

Main Differences

  • • CPU speed is 2 x 3.7 & 4 x 3 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 8 x 3.3 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has 12 threads while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has 16 threads.
  • • Turbo clock speed is 4.9 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 5.1 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • L2 cache is 6 MB on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 8 MB on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • big.LITTLE technology is used by the AMD Ryzen 5 220 but is not present on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The clock multiplier is 32 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 33 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The PassMark multi-core result is 18272 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 23408 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The PassMark single-core result is 3600 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 3733 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • The integrated GPU is the Radeon 740M on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the Radeon 780M on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • GPU turbo clock speed is 2800 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 2700 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Texture mapping units (TMUs) number 16 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 48 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Render output units (ROPs) number 8 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 32 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Shading units number 256 on the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and 768 on the AMD Ryzen 7 250.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 5 220

AMD Ryzen 5 220

AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen 7 250

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Laptop, Desktop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 28W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

In terms of general characteristics, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and AMD Ryzen 7 250 are virtually identical across every provided specification. Both processors are designed for use in Laptop and Desktop platforms, feature integrated graphics, and are built on the same modern 4 nm semiconductor process — a node that delivers strong efficiency and transistor density compared to older manufacturing generations.

Thermally, both chips share a 28W TDP and a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C, meaning system builders can expect the same thermal envelope and cooling requirements regardless of which chip they choose. Neither has an advantage in power efficiency or heat output based on these figures. Both also support PCIe 4.0 and 64-bit computing, ensuring compatibility with modern storage, GPUs, and operating systems.

Based strictly on the general info group, these two processors are in a complete tie — there is no differentiator here that favors either chip. Users should look to other specification groups such as core count, clock speeds, or cache to find meaningful distinctions between the Ryzen 5 220 and Ryzen 7 250.

Performance:
CPU speed 2 x 3.7 & 4 x 3 GHz 8 x 3.3 GHz
CPU threads 12 threads 16 threads
turbo clock speed 4.9GHz 5.1GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 6 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✓ ✕
clock multiplier 32 33

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 features a CPU speed of 2 x 3.7 GHz and 4 x 3 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 offers a higher base CPU speed of 8 x 3.3 GHz. This means the Ryzen 7 250 has a more consistent clock speed across all its cores compared to the Ryzen 5 220, which has a combination of two faster and four slower cores.

In terms of CPU threads, the Ryzen 5 220 has 12 threads, whereas the Ryzen 7 250 has 16 threads, reflecting its additional cores and potentially better parallel processing capability.

Both processors feature turbo clock speeds, with the Ryzen 5 220 reaching 4.9 GHz and the Ryzen 7 250 reaching 5.1 GHz. Neither product has an unlocked multiplier, meaning neither processor can be easily overclocked. The Ryzen 5 220 has a 6 MB L2 cache and a 16 MB L3 cache, while the Ryzen 7 250 offers a slightly larger 8 MB L2 cache but has the same 16 MB L3 cache. Lastly, the Ryzen 5 220 uses big.LITTLE technology, while the Ryzen 7 250 does not, and the clock multipliers are 32 for the Ryzen 5 220 and 33 for the Ryzen 7 250.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 18272 23408
PassMark result (single) 3600 3733

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 has a PassMark result of 18,272, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has a higher PassMark result of 23,408. This indicates the Ryzen 7 250 performs better in multi-threaded workloads based on this benchmark.

When looking at the PassMark single-threaded result, the Ryzen 5 220 scores 3,600, while the Ryzen 7 250 slightly edges it out with a score of 3,733. This difference is relatively small but still shows a slight performance advantage for the Ryzen 7 250 in single-threaded tasks.

In summary, both processors perform well in their respective benchmarks, with the Ryzen 7 250 showing higher results in both overall and single-threaded PassMark tests compared to the Ryzen 5 220.

Integrated graphics:
GPU clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
GPU name Radeon 740M Radeon 780M
GPU turbo 2800 MHz 2700 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 2.1
texture mapping units (TMUs) 16 48
render output units (ROPs) 8 32
shading units 256 768

The AMD Ryzen 5 220 features integrated Radeon 740M graphics with a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, while the AMD Ryzen 7 250 has the slightly higher Radeon 780M GPU, also clocked at 800 MHz. Despite the same base clock speed, the Ryzen 7 250's GPU has a turbo boost of 2,700 MHz, slightly lower than the 2,800 MHz turbo speed of the Ryzen 5 220.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, ensuring they are compatible with modern graphics standards. They can also handle up to 4 supported displays, making them suitable for multi-monitor setups.

The Ryzen 7 250 has a significant advantage in terms of graphical power, with 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), 32 render output units (ROPs), and 768 shading units, compared to the Ryzen 5 220's 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 256 shading units. This suggests that the Ryzen 7 250 is likely to offer a more robust graphics performance overall.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 7500 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 256GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✕

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 support the same maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz, DDR memory version 5, and operate with 2 memory channels. These features ensure that both processors offer similar memory performance capabilities.

In terms of maximum memory amount, both processors can support up to 256 GB of RAM, providing ample memory capacity for demanding tasks. Neither processor supports ECC memory, which means they do not offer error-correcting code functionality for added memory reliability.

Overall, the memory specifications of the Ryzen 5 220 and Ryzen 7 250 are identical, offering the same high-speed, high-capacity memory options without ECC support.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✓
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 220 and the AMD Ryzen 7 250 support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. This ensures they have identical capabilities for handling a variety of modern applications and workloads.

Both processors also utilize multithreading, enabling better performance in parallel tasks. Additionally, they both have the NX bit, a security feature that helps protect against certain types of malicious software.

In summary, the features of the Ryzen 5 220 and Ryzen 7 250 are identical, offering the same instruction sets, multithreading support, and security capabilities.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining the full specification set, a clear picture emerges for each processor. The AMD Ryzen 7 250 pulls ahead in raw performance, delivering a significantly higher PassMark multi-core score of 23408 versus 18272, a higher turbo clock of 5.1 GHz, more threads (16 vs 12), and a larger 8 MB L2 cache. Its Radeon 780M integrated graphics — with 768 shading units and 48 TMUs — also vastly outperforms the Ryzen 5 220's Radeon 740M. On the other hand, the AMD Ryzen 5 220 brings its own advantage through big.LITTLE hybrid core technology, which can offer better power efficiency in lightly threaded workloads, and a slightly higher GPU turbo of 2800 MHz. Both chips share the same memory platform, TDP, and feature set, making the Ryzen 5 220 a compelling option for budget-conscious users who value efficiency, while the Ryzen 7 250 is the stronger pick for demanding workloads and GPU-intensive tasks.

AMD Ryzen 5 220
Buy AMD Ryzen 5 220 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen 5 220 if you prioritize power-efficient hybrid core performance for everyday workloads and do not require the highest multi-core throughput or advanced integrated graphics.

AMD Ryzen 7 250
Buy AMD Ryzen 7 250 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen 7 250 if you need stronger multi-core performance, a higher turbo clock speed, and significantly more powerful integrated graphics with the Radeon 780M for GPU-intensive tasks.