AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 VS AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 are designed for use in laptops and desktops, with no difference in this category. Both processors include integrated graphics, offering similar capabilities in terms of display handling. They share identical values for thermal design power (TDP), with both processors rated at 28W, indicating similar power consumption and heat dissipation characteristics.

In terms of semiconductor size, both processors utilize a 4 nm process, ensuring they are built using the same advanced manufacturing technology. CPU temperature is also identical for both models, with both rated at 100 °C, meaning they are designed to operate at the same maximum temperature threshold before thermal issues could arise.

Lastly, both the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 support PCI Express (PCIe) version 4, providing the same speed and bandwidth for connected devices. Both processors are also 64-bit compatible, allowing them to handle modern computing tasks with the same level of software support and memory addressing capability.

The AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 differ slightly in CPU speed and architecture. The H 230 features a 6-core CPU running at a base speed of 3.5 GHz across all cores, while the Pro 215 has a combination of 2 cores running at 3.2 GHz and 4 cores at 3.2 GHz, likely leveraging a dynamic boost for certain tasks. This results in a more varied performance profile for the Pro 215 compared to the fixed speed of the H 230.

Both processors are equipped with 12 threads, ensuring strong multi-tasking capabilities, and neither features an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option for either model. When it comes to cache, the H 230 has a 6 MB L2 cache and a 12 MB L3 cache, while the Pro 215 offers the same 6 MB L2 cache but has a larger 16 MB L3 cache, which could provide better performance in certain cache-sensitive workloads.

The Pro 215 also incorporates big.LITTLE technology, which is absent in the H 230. This feature in the Pro 215 allows it to switch between high-performance cores and power-efficient cores, potentially optimizing for power consumption and heat management. Additionally, the H 230 uses a 35x clock multiplier, while the Pro 215 uses a slightly lower 32x multiplier, which correlates with the lower base CPU speeds for its cores.

The integrated graphics in both the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 have some notable differences. Both processors feature a base GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, but their GPU turbo speeds differ. The H 230’s Radeon 760M can boost up to 2600 MHz, while the Pro 215’s Radeon 740M can reach a slightly higher turbo speed of 2700 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern applications and games. However, the H 230 has more texture mapping units (TMUs) with 32, compared to the Pro 215’s 16. The H 230 also has 16 render output units (ROPs) and 512 shading units, which again outmatch the Pro 215’s 8 ROPs and 256 shading units.

In summary, the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 offers a more powerful integrated GPU, with higher TMUs, ROPs, and shading units, while the Pro 215’s graphics are more modest in comparison. The difference in GPU turbo speed is minor, but the H 230’s graphics are generally better-equipped for graphics-intensive tasks.

The AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 are quite similar when it comes to memory specifications. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz and use DDR5 memory, ensuring fast and modern memory support. Additionally, both models feature two memory channels, allowing for improved memory bandwidth.

In terms of maximum memory capacity, both processors can support up to 256 GB of RAM, providing plenty of room for demanding applications and multitasking. The key difference between the two is that the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 supports ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, while the H 230 does not. ECC memory can detect and correct errors, which is useful in critical applications where data integrity is paramount, but this feature is not available on the H 230.

Overall, the two processors are very similar in terms of memory performance, with the only distinction being the Pro 215’s support for ECC memory, which could make it a better choice for certain professional or mission-critical use cases.

Both the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 share identical features when it comes to instruction sets, multithreading, and security. Both processors support a wide range of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2, ensuring compatibility with a variety of modern software and workloads. Additionally, both processors utilize multithreading, allowing them to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, enhancing performance in multi-core optimized applications.

Both models also feature the NX bit, a security feature that helps protect against certain types of malicious attacks, such as buffer overflow attacks. There is no difference in these key features between the H 230 and the Pro 215.

In conclusion, the features of the AMD Ryzen 5 H 230 and the AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 215 are identical in this category, offering the same instruction sets, multithreading capabilities, and security features, with no distinguishing factors between the two products.