AMD Ryzen 7 160 VS Intel Core i5-110

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i5-110 are both designed for laptops, with the AMD option also supporting desktop configurations. One key difference between them is their thermal design power (TDP). The Ryzen 7 160 has a much lower TDP of 28W, while the Core i5-110 consumes 65W, which could indicate that the Intel processor is designed to handle more power for potentially higher performance but may generate more heat.

In terms of semiconductor size, the Ryzen 7 160 uses a 6 nm process, which is smaller and typically more power-efficient compared to the Intel Core i5-110's 14 nm process. This difference could contribute to better energy efficiency in the AMD processor.

When it comes to PCIe versions, the Ryzen 7 160 supports PCIe 4.0, while the Intel Core i5-110 supports PCIe 3.0. PCIe 4.0 offers faster data transfer speeds compared to PCIe 3.0, which could be beneficial for tasks that rely on high-speed data transfer, such as gaming or video editing. Both processors support 64-bit architecture and have integrated graphics, but the AMD Ryzen 7 160 has a lower CPU temperature of 95°C compared to the 100°C of the Intel Core i5-110, indicating that the AMD processor might run slightly cooler under load.

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i5-110 differ in several key performance aspects. The Ryzen 7 160 features a CPU speed of 8 x 2.7 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 has a slightly higher base speed of 6 x 2.9 GHz. However, the Ryzen 7 160 has more threads at 16, compared to 12 threads on the Intel Core i5-110. This means the Ryzen 7 160 may handle more parallel tasks at once, which could be beneficial in multi-threaded workloads.

In terms of turbo clock speed, the Ryzen 7 160 can boost up to 4.75 GHz, whereas the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.3 GHz. The Ryzen 7 160 therefore has a higher potential peak performance in terms of clock speed. Both processors have an L3 cache with the Ryzen 7 160 offering 16 MB, compared to the Intel Core i5-110’s 12 MB. This gives the Ryzen processor a slight edge in cache size for potentially faster data access.

Both processors share the same L3 core size of 2 MB/core and do not feature big.LITTLE technology. Additionally, neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, meaning they cannot be overclocked. The Ryzen 7 160 operates with a clock multiplier of 27, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses a multiplier of 29. This reflects a slightly different approach to handling base and turbo speeds, though the impact on real-world performance may depend on the specific use case.

The integrated graphics of the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i5-110 differ significantly in terms of performance and features. The Ryzen 7 160 is equipped with the Radeon 680M GPU, which operates at a base clock speed of 2000 MHz and can turbo boost up to 2200 MHz. In contrast, the Intel Core i5-110 uses the UHD Graphics 630, with a much lower base clock of 350 MHz and a turbo boost of 1100 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, but the Ryzen 7 160 has an OpenGL version of 4.6, compared to the Intel Core i5-110’s OpenGL 4.5. This slight difference may offer the Ryzen 7 160 a minor advantage in handling certain graphics tasks. Additionally, the Ryzen 7 160 supports 4 displays, while the Intel Core i5-110 supports 3 displays, giving the Ryzen processor a slight edge in multi-display setups.

When it comes to computational graphics features, the Ryzen 7 160 has significantly more resources. It includes 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), 32 render output units (ROPs), and 768 shading units, all of which are much higher than the Intel Core i5-110’s 24 TMUs, 3 ROPs, and 192 shading units. These differences suggest that the Radeon 680M in the Ryzen 7 160 is built for more demanding graphical tasks, such as gaming or content creation, compared to the UHD Graphics 630 in the Intel Core i5-110.

The AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i5-110 show notable differences in memory capabilities. The Ryzen 7 160 supports a maximum RAM speed of 4800 MHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 is limited to 2666 MHz. This means the Ryzen processor can potentially offer faster memory performance, which may be beneficial for bandwidth-intensive applications.

Regarding memory bandwidth, the Ryzen 7 160 has a maximum of 76.8 GB/s, which is significantly higher than the Intel Core i5-110's 41.6 GB/s. This difference suggests that the Ryzen processor is designed to handle more data at once, which could be helpful for tasks like video editing or 3D rendering.

Both processors support dual-channel memory with 2 memory channels, and both are capable of supporting large amounts of RAM. The Ryzen 7 160 can handle up to 64GB, while the Intel Core i5-110 can accommodate up to 128GB. Additionally, the Ryzen 7 160 supports ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, which can help improve system stability by detecting and correcting memory errors, a feature not supported by the Intel Core i5-110.

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 160 and Intel Core i5-110 support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. These instruction sets are commonly used for various computing tasks, such as encryption, multimedia processing, and floating-point operations, so both processors are equipped for similar workloads in this regard.

Both processors also utilize multithreading, which allows each core to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, improving performance in multithreaded applications.

However, a key difference lies in the presence of the NX bit (No Execute bit). The Intel Core i5-110 has the NX bit, which enhances security by marking certain areas of memory as non-executable, preventing certain types of attacks. The AMD Ryzen 7 160, on the other hand, does not have this feature.