TurboVS
AMD Ryzen 7 250
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen 7 250 AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. Both chips share the same 28W TDP and 4 nm process node, yet they take notably different approaches to CPU architecture and integrated graphics. Whether you care most about raw multi-core throughput, gaming on integrated graphics, or maximum memory bandwidth, this page breaks down every key metric side by side so you can make a truly informed decision.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both processors are available for Laptop and Desktop form factors.
  • ✓ Both processors have integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both processors have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W.
  • ✓ Both processors are built on a 4 nm semiconductor process.
  • ✓ Both processors have a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C.
  • ✓ Both processors support PCI Express (PCIe) version 4.
  • ✓ Both processors support 64-bit computing.
  • ✓ Both processors have 16 CPU threads.
  • ✓ Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ Both processors have 8 MB of L2 cache.
  • ✓ Both processors have 16 MB of L3 cache.
  • ✓ Both integrated graphics solutions support DirectX 12.
  • ✓ Both integrated graphics solutions support up to 4 displays.
  • ✓ Both integrated graphics solutions support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • ✓ Both integrated graphics solutions support OpenCL version 2.1.
  • ✓ Both processors use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both processors have 2 memory channels.
  • ✓ Both processors support a maximum memory amount of 256 GB.
  • ✓ ECC memory is not supported on either processor.
  • ✓ Both processors support the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Both processors support multithreading.
  • ✓ Both processors have the NX bit security feature.

Main Differences

  • • CPU speed is 8 x 3.3 GHz on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 4 x 2 GHz & 4 x 2 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • Turbo clock speed is 5.1 GHz on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 5 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • big.LITTLE technology is used on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 but not on AMD Ryzen 7 250.
  • • Clock multiplier is 33 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 20 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • PassMark result (multi-core) is 23408 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 34459 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • PassMark result (single-core) is 3733 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 3878 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • GPU base clock speed is 800 MHz on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 400 MHz on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • The integrated GPU is Radeon 780M on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and Radeon 860M on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • GPU turbo clock speed is 2700 MHz on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 3000 MHz on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • Texture mapping units (TMUs) number 48 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 32 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • Render output units (ROPs) number 32 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 8 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • Shading units number 768 on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 512 on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
  • • Maximum RAM speed is 7500 MHz on AMD Ryzen 7 250 and 8000 MHz on AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen 7 250

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Laptop, Desktop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 28W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

In terms of general specifications, the AMD Ryzen 7 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are virtually identical across every measured dimension in this group. Both processors are designed for Laptop and Desktop platforms, feature integrated graphics, carry a 28W TDP, are built on a 4nm manufacturing process, share a maximum CPU temperature of 100°C, support PCIe 4.0, and are both fully 64-bit compatible.

The shared 4nm node and 28W TDP are worth contextualizing: a 4nm process delivers a strong balance of power efficiency and transistor density, enabling capable performance without excessive heat output. The 28W envelope makes both chips suitable for thin-and-light laptops as well as compact desktops, where thermal headroom is limited. The 100°C junction temperature ceiling is standard for modern AMD processors and indicates robust thermal management headroom under sustained loads.

Based strictly on this group's data, there is no differentiator between the two processors — they are in a complete tie across all general specifications. Users should look to other spec groups, such as CPU performance cores, clock speeds, or AI-specific features, to distinguish between these two chips.

Performance:
CPU speed 8 x 3.3 GHz 4 x 2 & 4 x 2 GHz
CPU threads 16 threads 16 threads
turbo clock speed 5.1GHz 5GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 16 MB
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✕ ✓
clock multiplier 33 20

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 differ in several performance-related aspects. The Ryzen 7 250 features 8 CPU cores with a base speed of 3.3 GHz and a turbo clock speed of 5.1 GHz. In comparison, the Ryzen AI 7 350 has a more complex CPU configuration, with 4 cores running at 2 GHz and another 4 cores at 2 GHz, giving a base speed of 2 GHz. Its turbo clock speed is slightly lower at 5 GHz.

Both processors offer the same number of CPU threads, 16 threads in total. In terms of cache, both CPUs are equipped with 8 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of L3 cache, so they are identical in that respect.

One key difference is the use of big.LITTLE technology. The Ryzen AI 7 350 utilizes big.LITTLE, while the Ryzen 7 250 does not. This technology allows the Ryzen AI 7 350 to better optimize power efficiency by using a mix of high-performance and energy-efficient cores. Additionally, the clock multiplier is higher in the Ryzen 7 250 (33x) compared to the Ryzen AI 7 350 (20x), indicating a different approach to how the processors handle frequency scaling.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 23408 34459
PassMark result (single) 3733 3878

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 show notable differences in benchmark results. The Ryzen 7 250 scores 23,408 in the overall PassMark test and 3,733 in the single-threaded test. In contrast, the Ryzen AI 7 350 performs better with an overall PassMark score of 34,459 and a single-threaded score of 3,878.

These differences indicate that the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers higher overall performance as well as slightly better single-thread performance compared to the Ryzen 7 250, based purely on the provided benchmark results.

Both processors show relatively strong single-threaded performance, but the Ryzen AI 7 350 leads in both areas, reflecting its potentially higher processing capabilities in various workloads.

Integrated graphics:
GPU clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz
GPU name Radeon 780M Radeon 860M
GPU turbo 2700 MHz 3000 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 2.1
texture mapping units (TMUs) 48 32
render output units (ROPs) 32 8
shading units 768 512

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 both feature integrated Radeon GPUs, but with some key differences in their specifications. The Ryzen 7 250 is equipped with the Radeon 780M GPU, which has a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz and a turbo speed of 2,700 MHz. In comparison, the Ryzen AI 7 350 features the Radeon 860M GPU, with a lower base clock speed of 400 MHz but a higher turbo clock speed of 3,000 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 2.1, and can handle up to 4 supported displays. However, the Radeon 780M in the Ryzen 7 250 offers more texture mapping units (48 TMUs) and render output units (32 ROPs) compared to the Radeon 860M in the Ryzen AI 7 350, which has 32 TMUs and 8 ROPs. The 780M also has 768 shading units, while the 860M has 512 shading units.

These differences suggest that the Ryzen 7 250's integrated GPU is likely better equipped for handling higher graphical workloads, with more TMUs, ROPs, and shading units, despite the Ryzen AI 7 350's higher turbo clock speed.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 8000 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 256GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✕

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 have similar memory specifications with a few notable differences. Both processors support DDR5 memory, have two memory channels, and can handle a maximum of 256GB of RAM. However, the Ryzen AI 7 350 supports a slightly higher maximum RAM speed of 8,000 MHz compared to the Ryzen 7 250's 7,500 MHz.

Both products do not support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, meaning they are not designed for highly critical applications where data integrity is paramount.

Overall, the key difference in memory performance lies in the RAM speed, with the Ryzen AI 7 350 offering a marginally higher maximum speed of 8,000 MHz compared to the Ryzen 7 250’s 7,500 MHz.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✓
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen 7 250 and AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 are identical in terms of features, as both processors share the same instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. Both products also support multithreading, enabling them to handle multiple tasks simultaneously for improved performance in multi-threaded applications.

Additionally, both processors feature the NX bit (No Execute bit), which helps improve security by preventing the execution of malicious code in certain areas of memory.

Overall, there are no differences between the two processors in this group, as both the Ryzen 7 250 and the Ryzen AI 7 350 offer the same set of features.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining every specification, a clear picture emerges for each processor. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 pulls ahead in overall computational muscle, posting a significantly higher PassMark multi-core score of 34,459 versus 23,408, and it pairs that with a faster Radeon 860M GPU turbo of 3,000 MHz and support for 8,000 MHz DDR5 RAM, making it the stronger pick for users who demand top-tier multitasking and future-ready memory performance. The AMD Ryzen 7 250, on the other hand, counters with a higher GPU base clock, far more shading units (768 vs 512), more TMUs (48 vs 32), and more ROPs (32 vs 8), giving it a denser integrated graphics pipeline that could benefit GPU-light workloads at lower clock states. Choose the Ryzen AI 7 350 for demanding productivity and modern gaming scenarios; choose the Ryzen 7 250 if raw integrated GPU resource count and a slightly higher CPU turbo edge matter most to you.

AMD Ryzen 7 250
Buy AMD Ryzen 7 250 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen 7 250 if you want a denser integrated graphics pipeline with more shading units, TMUs, and ROPs, and prefer a slightly higher CPU turbo clock of 5.1 GHz.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Buy AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 if you prioritize superior multi-core performance, a higher GPU turbo speed of 3,000 MHz with the Radeon 860M, and faster DDR5 memory support up to 8,000 MHz.