AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 VS AMD Ryzen AI 5 330

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 are designed for laptops and desktops and both feature integrated graphics. These processors support 64-bit computing, ensuring compatibility with modern software and operating systems.

When it comes to thermal design power (TDP), the Ryzen 7 H 260 has a higher TDP of 45W, compared to the Ryzen AI 5 330's 28W. This means the Ryzen 7 H 260 is likely to produce more heat and require more cooling compared to the Ryzen AI 5 330. However, both processors have a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C, indicating similar thermal tolerance.

Both products are built using the same 4 nm semiconductor size, which helps improve performance and efficiency. They also support PCI Express (PCIe) version 4, providing faster data transfer speeds compared to previous versions. Overall, while the two processors share many core features, they differ mainly in their power consumption, with the Ryzen 7 H 260 being more power-hungry than the Ryzen AI 5 330.

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 differ significantly in their CPU speed and architecture. The Ryzen 7 H 260 has a CPU speed of 8 x 3.8 GHz, indicating 8 cores with a base clock speed of 3.8 GHz. In comparison, the Ryzen AI 5 330 has a more complex setup with a CPU speed of 1 x 2 GHz and 3 x 2 GHz, which suggests a combination of cores running at different clock speeds.

In terms of CPU threads, the Ryzen 7 H 260 supports 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 has only 8 threads. This means the Ryzen 7 H 260 can handle more simultaneous tasks, which may contribute to better multi-threaded performance in certain applications.

The Ryzen 7 H 260 also outperforms the Ryzen AI 5 330 in turbo clock speed, with a peak of 5.1 GHz compared to 4.5 GHz for the Ryzen AI 5 330. Both processors have a locked multiplier, meaning neither is overclockable, but the Ryzen 7 H 260 benefits from higher clock speeds. For cache memory, the Ryzen 7 H 260 has 8 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 has 4 MB of L2 cache and 8 MB of L3 cache, offering lower cache capacities overall. Additionally, the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses big.LITTLE technology, which the Ryzen 7 H 260 does not, allowing the Ryzen AI 5 330 to optimize power efficiency by using a mix of high-performance and low-power cores.

The AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 show notable differences in their PassMark benchmark scores. The Ryzen 7 H 260 achieves a PassMark result of 29385, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 has a much lower result of 13809. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 H 260 generally delivers better overall performance in multi-threaded tasks, based on this benchmark.

When looking at single-threaded performance, the Ryzen 7 H 260 also leads, with a single-core PassMark score of 3954, compared to 3816 for the Ryzen AI 5 330. Although the gap is smaller in single-core performance, the Ryzen 7 H 260 still holds an advantage.

These differences in benchmark scores suggest that the Ryzen 7 H 260 is better suited for applications requiring higher overall and single-threaded performance, while the Ryzen AI 5 330, with its lower scores, may cater to less demanding workloads.

The integrated graphics of the AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 show some differences in terms of GPU clock speed and turbo performance. The Ryzen 7 H 260 features a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz, with a turbo frequency of 2700 MHz, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 has a higher turbo speed of 2800 MHz but no base GPU clock speed listed.

Both processors come with similar capabilities in terms of display support, as both can handle up to 4 supported displays. They also both support the same DirectX version, DirectX 12, and the same OpenGL version, 4.6. Additionally, both support OpenCL version 2.1, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of graphics-based applications.

As for the GPU names, the Ryzen 7 H 260 is equipped with the Radeon 780M, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 uses the Radeon 820M. These names indicate different GPU models, though the provided specifications do not directly compare performance differences between the two.

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 support the same DDR memory version, which is DDR5, and both utilize 2 memory channels. They also have the same maximum memory amount of 256GB, providing ample memory capacity for most use cases. Neither processor supports ECC memory, which is typically used for error correction in server or workstation environments.

When it comes to RAM speed, the Ryzen 7 H 260 has a maximum speed of 7500 MHz, while the Ryzen AI 5 330 supports a slightly higher maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz. This gives the Ryzen AI 5 330 a small edge in terms of memory bandwidth, although both speeds are quite high for consumer-grade systems.

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 H 260 and AMD Ryzen AI 5 330 support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. These instruction sets help improve the performance of certain applications by enabling the processors to handle more complex tasks and calculations.

Both processors also support multithreading, allowing them to handle multiple threads simultaneously for improved multitasking and overall performance in parallel workloads. Additionally, both products include the NX bit, a security feature that helps prevent certain types of malicious attacks.

Given that the specifications for features like instruction sets, multithreading, and NX bit are identical for both products, there are no significant differences in these areas between the Ryzen 7 H 260 and the Ryzen AI 5 330.