TurboVS
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385. Both processors share the same 4 nm architecture, 16-thread design, and DDR5 memory support, yet they diverge significantly in areas like thermal envelope, cache hierarchy, integrated graphics capability, and memory configuration. Read on to see how these two chips stack up across performance benchmarks, GPU specs, and platform features.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both products are available as Desktop and Laptop type processors.
  • ✓ Integrated graphics are present on both products.
  • ✓ Both processors are manufactured using a 4 nm semiconductor process.
  • ✓ The maximum CPU temperature is 100 °C on both products.
  • ✓ Both products use PCIe version 4.
  • ✓ 64-bit support is available on both products.
  • ✓ Both processors have 16 CPU threads.
  • ✓ Neither product has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ Both products include 8 MB of L2 cache.
  • ✓ Each core on both products has 1 MB of L2 cache.
  • ✓ Neither product uses big.LITTLE technology.
  • ✓ Both products support DirectX 12 on their integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both products support up to 4 displays via integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both products support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • ✓ Both products use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both products support the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Multithreading is supported on both products.
  • ✓ The NX bit security feature is present on both products.

Main Differences

  • • Thermal Design Power (TDP) is 28W on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 55W on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • Base CPU speed is 8 x 3.3 GHz on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 8 x 3.6 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • Turbo clock speed is 5.1 GHz on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 5 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • L3 cache is 16 MB on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 32 MB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • L1 cache is 512 KB on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 640 KB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • L3 cache per core is 2 MB/core on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 4 MB/core on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • The clock multiplier is 33 on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 36 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • PassMark multi-core result is 23279 on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 33441 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • PassMark single-core result is 3795 on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 4052 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • The integrated GPU is the Radeon 780M on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the Radeon 8050S on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • GPU turbo frequency is 2700 MHz on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 2800 MHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • OpenCL version is 2.1 on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 3 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • Maximum RAM speed is 7500 MHz on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 8000 MHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • Memory channels number 2 on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 4 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • Maximum memory capacity is 256 GB on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 128 GB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385.
  • • ECC memory support is present on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 but not available on AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

General info:
Type Desktop, Laptop Desktop, Laptop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 55W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

At a foundational level, the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 share a surprisingly consistent baseline: both are built on a 4 nm process node, support 64-bit computing, include integrated graphics, target both desktop and laptop form factors, max out at a 100 °C CPU temperature ceiling, and use PCIe 4.0. This means neither holds an architectural edge in terms of platform compatibility or manufacturing maturity — they are effectively peers on these fronts.

The single meaningful differentiator in this group is Thermal Design Power (TDP): the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 is rated at 28W, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is rated at 55W — nearly double. In practice, TDP is a proxy for both sustained performance headroom and heat output. A higher TDP allows the processor to sustain heavier workloads for longer without throttling, but it also demands more robust cooling solutions and draws more power, which is a meaningful trade-off in thin laptops or thermally constrained desktops.

Based strictly on this group's data, the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 holds a clear performance-headroom edge due to its significantly higher TDP, suggesting it is positioned for more demanding, sustained workloads. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250, conversely, has the advantage in efficiency-focused deployments — particularly in battery-powered or passively cooled scenarios where thermal and power budgets are tight.

Performance:
CPU speed 8 x 3.3 GHz 8 x 3.6 GHz
CPU threads 16 threads 16 threads
turbo clock speed 5.1GHz 5GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 8 MB 8 MB
L3 cache 16 MB 32 MB
L1 cache 512 KB 640 KB
L2 core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 core 2 MB/core 4 MB/core
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✕ ✕
clock multiplier 33 36

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 share similar threading capabilities, with both featuring 16 threads. However, they differ in several other performance-related aspects. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 has a base CPU speed of 8 x 3.3 GHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 offers a slightly higher base speed of 8 x 3.6 GHz.

In terms of turbo clock speed, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 reaches up to 5.1 GHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385's turbo speed is slightly lower at 5 GHz. Both processors have a locked multiplier, meaning neither can be overclocked. Their cache sizes also differ: the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 features 8 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has the same 8 MB of L2 cache but a larger 32 MB of L3 cache.

Both processors share the same L2 cache core size of 1 MB/core and L3 cache core size of 2 MB/core for the Ryzen 7 Pro 250, and 4 MB/core for the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385. Neither product uses big.LITTLE technology. Finally, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 has a clock multiplier of 33, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a clock multiplier of 36.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 23279 33441
PassMark result (single) 3795 4052

The PassMark results for both the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 show notable differences in overall performance. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 achieves a PassMark result of 23279, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 scores a higher 33441. This indicates that the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a stronger overall performance score compared to the Ryzen 7 Pro 250.

In terms of single-threaded performance, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 achieves a score of 3795, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 slightly outperforms it with a score of 4052. This difference suggests that, while both processors perform similarly in single-threaded tasks, the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 has a higher single-threaded performance score.

Overall, both processors exhibit strong performance, but the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 leads in both overall and single-threaded PassMark benchmarks.

Integrated graphics:
GPU name Radeon 780M Radeon 8050S
GPU turbo 2700 MHz 2800 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 3

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 both feature integrated graphics, but with different GPU models and performance characteristics. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 comes with the Radeon 780M GPU, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 is equipped with the Radeon 8050S GPU. Both GPUs support DirectX 12 and OpenGL 4.6, providing modern graphics capabilities for a variety of applications.

The GPU turbo speed differs slightly, with the Ryzen 7 Pro 250's Radeon 780M reaching a turbo speed of 2700 MHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385's Radeon 8050S achieves a slightly higher turbo speed of 2800 MHz. Both processors support up to 4 displays, offering flexibility for multi-monitor setups.

Additionally, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 supports OpenCL version 2.1, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports the newer OpenCL version 3. This indicates that the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 may have some additional capabilities related to OpenCL 3, though the difference may not be significant for all use cases.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 8000 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 4
maximum memory amount 256GB 128GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✓

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 have some notable differences in their memory specifications. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 supports a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports a slightly higher maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz. Both processors use DDR5 memory, but the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 is limited to 2 memory channels, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 utilizes 4 memory channels, which may provide better memory bandwidth.

In terms of maximum memory capacity, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 can handle up to 256 GB, whereas the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 supports a maximum of 128 GB. The Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 also supports ECC memory, a feature not supported by the Ryzen 7 Pro 250, which is useful for systems that require higher data integrity and error correction.

Overall, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 offers a larger memory capacity, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 benefits from faster memory speeds, more memory channels, and ECC memory support.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✓
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 share identical features in this group. Both processors support the same instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. This ensures compatibility with a wide range of software that utilizes these instruction sets for various tasks such as encryption, multimedia, and vector processing.

Both processors also use multithreading, which allows them to handle multiple threads of execution concurrently, improving performance in multitasking and parallel computing scenarios. Additionally, both products have the NX bit enabled, which provides an extra layer of security by preventing the execution of malicious code in certain areas of memory.

As a result, the features in this category are exactly the same for both the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the Ryzen AI Max Pro 385, with no differences in their instruction set support, multithreading capability, or NX bit functionality.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After a thorough look at the specifications, both processors serve distinct audiences. The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 stands out with its lower 28W TDP, a higher maximum memory capacity of 256 GB, and a slightly higher turbo clock speed of 5.1 GHz, making it a compelling choice for efficiency-focused deployments and memory-intensive workloads. The AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385, on the other hand, dominates in raw throughput, offering a significantly higher PassMark score of 33441, 32 MB of L3 cache, four memory channels, ECC memory support, and a more capable Radeon 8050S GPU — advantages that translate directly into heavier compute tasks and professional workloads. Choose based on whether your priority is efficiency and memory capacity or outright performance and reliability.

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250
Buy AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 if...

Choose the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 if you need a lower power draw of 28W, support for up to 256 GB of RAM, or a slightly higher turbo clock speed for efficiency-focused systems.

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385
Buy AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 if...

Choose the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 if you need superior multi-core performance, four memory channels, ECC memory support, a larger 32 MB L3 cache, and a more powerful integrated GPU for demanding professional workloads.