TurboVS
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250
Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Overview

Choosing between the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H means weighing two very different philosophies in processor design. In this detailed comparison, we put both chips side by side across performance benchmarks, integrated graphics capabilities, memory support limits, and architectural features — giving you everything you need to determine which processor is the right fit for your specific use case.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both processors include integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W.
  • ✓ Both support 64-bit computing.
  • ✓ Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ Both support up to 4 displays via integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both share an OpenGL version of 4.6.
  • ✓ Both use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both feature a dual-channel memory configuration.
  • ✓ ECC memory is not supported on either processor.
  • ✓ Both share the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ The NX bit security feature is present on both processors.

Main Differences

  • • The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 is available for both Desktop and Laptop form factors, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is designed for Laptop only.
  • • The semiconductor size is 4 nm on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 3 nm on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The maximum CPU temperature is 100 °C on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 110 °C on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The PCIe version is 4 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 5 on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • CPU speed is 8 x 3.3 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 4 x 2.4 GHz & 8 x 1.8 GHz on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 has 16 CPU threads, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has 14 threads.
  • • Turbo clock speed is 5.1 GHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 5.0 GHz on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • big.LITTLE technology is used on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H but not on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250.
  • • The clock multiplier is 33 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 24 on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The PassMark multi-core result is 23279 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 28448 on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The PassMark single-core result is 3795 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 4361 on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The integrated GPU turbo speed is 2700 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 2250 MHz on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • DirectX support is version 12 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and DirectX 12 Ultimate on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • The OpenCL version is 2.1 on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 3 on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • Maximum RAM speed is 7500 MHz on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 8400 MHz on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • Maximum memory capacity is 256 GB on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and 128 GB on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
  • • Multithreading is supported on the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 but is not available on the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

General info:
Type Desktop, Laptop Laptop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 28W
semiconductor size 4 nm 3 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 110 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 5
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H share a common baseline in several key areas: both carry a 28W TDP, integrate onboard graphics, and fully support 64-bit computing. This means neither chip has an inherent power-envelope advantage, and both are viable for systems that rely on integrated GPU without a discrete card.

Where the two diverge is in manufacturing process, thermal headroom, and I/O capability. The Core Ultra 5 235H is built on a 3 nm process versus the Ryzen 7 Pro 250's 4 nm, which generally translates to better transistor density and improved power efficiency at equivalent workloads — a meaningful edge in thermally constrained laptop designs. Intel also pulls ahead on connectivity with PCIe 5.0 support compared to PCIe 4.0 on the AMD, doubling the theoretical bandwidth available to NVMe SSDs and future-generation peripherals. Additionally, the Core Ultra 5 235H has a higher rated maximum CPU temperature of 110 °C versus 100 °C, giving it slightly more thermal headroom before throttling kicks in.

A notable distinction is platform flexibility: the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 is listed as compatible with both Desktop and Laptop form factors, while the Core Ultra 5 235H is laptop-only. For users evaluating these chips in a desktop or embedded context, AMD is the only option here. However, in a pure laptop-to-laptop comparison, the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H holds a clear overall edge thanks to its newer fabrication node, superior PCIe generation, and greater thermal ceiling — advantages that compound in performance-intensive or storage-heavy use cases.

Performance:
CPU speed 8 x 3.3 GHz 4 x 2.4 & 8 x 1.8 GHz
CPU threads 16 threads 14 threads
turbo clock speed 5.1GHz 5GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✕ ✓
clock multiplier 33 24

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H differ in their CPU speed and architecture. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 operates with 8 cores at a base speed of 3.3 GHz, while the Core Ultra 5 235H has a more complex configuration, offering 4 cores at 2.4 GHz and 8 cores at 1.8 GHz, utilizing a big.LITTLE architecture. This allows the Intel processor to scale its performance more dynamically based on the workload.

In terms of CPU threads, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 supports 16 threads, whereas the Core Ultra 5 235H supports 14 threads, a difference that may impact multitasking performance. Both processors feature similar turbo clock speeds, with the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 boosting up to 5.1 GHz and the Core Ultra 5 235H reaching a slightly lower 5.0 GHz.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, meaning neither supports overclocking. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 uses a clock multiplier of 33, while the Core Ultra 5 235H uses a clock multiplier of 24, reflecting the different core configurations between the two.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 23279 28448
PassMark result (single) 3795 4361

When comparing the PassMark benchmark scores, the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H show notable differences in overall performance. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 achieves a PassMark result of 23279, while the Core Ultra 5 235H scores higher at 28448, indicating a stronger overall performance for the Intel processor.

Looking at the single-threaded performance, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 scores 3795, whereas the Core Ultra 5 235H scores 4361. This also shows the Intel processor having an advantage in single-core tasks, where it performs better than the Ryzen chip.

Both processors have distinct strengths in multi-threaded and single-threaded benchmarks, with the Core Ultra 5 235H leading in both categories according to these scores.

Integrated graphics:
GPU turbo 2700 MHz 2250 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12 Ultimate
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 2.1 3

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H feature integrated graphics that support a range of modern technologies. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250’s GPU turbo speed is 2700 MHz, while the Core Ultra 5 235H has a slightly lower turbo speed of 2250 MHz.

In terms of graphical API support, both processors support DirectX 12, but the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H goes a step further with support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, offering additional features compared to the standard DirectX 12 supported by the Ryzen 7 Pro 250.

Both processors support up to 4 displays, and they share the same OpenGL version of 4.6. However, the Intel processor supports OpenCL 3, while the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 supports OpenCL 2.1, indicating a potential difference in the OpenCL capabilities between the two chips.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 7500 MHz 8400 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 128GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✕

The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H both support DDR5 memory and have dual-channel memory configurations. The Ryzen 7 Pro 250 supports a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz, while the Core Ultra 5 235H can handle slightly faster speeds, reaching 8400 MHz.

In terms of memory capacity, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 can accommodate up to 256GB of RAM, whereas the Core Ultra 5 235H is limited to a maximum of 128GB. Both processors do not support ECC memory, meaning they do not have error-correcting capabilities for the installed RAM.

Overall, while both processors feature similar memory types and channel setups, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 offers more room for higher total memory, while the Core Ultra 5 235H supports slightly faster RAM speeds.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✕
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

Both the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 and Intel Core Ultra 5 235H support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2, making them compatible with a wide range of software and workloads. However, they differ in multithreading support; the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 utilizes multithreading, which allows it to handle more tasks simultaneously, whereas the Core Ultra 5 235H does not support multithreading.

Both processors also include the NX bit feature, which enhances security by preventing the execution of certain types of malicious code. This feature is present in both chips, providing an additional layer of protection against attacks.

In summary, while both processors share many similar features in terms of instruction sets and security, the Ryzen 7 Pro 250 has the advantage of multithreading, which can improve performance in multi-tasking environments.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining all the evidence, both processors serve distinct audiences with clear advantages. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H leads in raw benchmark output, delivering higher PassMark scores in both single and multi-core tests, faster RAM support up to 8400 MHz, a newer PCIe 5 interface, and more advanced DirectX 12 Ultimate graphics — making it the stronger pick for performance-focused laptop users. The AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250, on the other hand, supports a significantly larger 256 GB maximum memory capacity, offers a higher integrated GPU turbo at 2700 MHz, includes multithreading, and covers both desktop and laptop platforms — a compelling advantage for memory-intensive or versatile workloads. With both sharing a 28W TDP and a DDR5 memory standard, the final decision comes down to whether raw performance or platform flexibility and memory headroom matters most to you.

AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250
Buy AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen 7 Pro 250 if you need flexibility across both desktop and laptop platforms, require up to 256 GB of RAM for memory-intensive workloads, or value a higher integrated GPU turbo clock and multithreading support.

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H
Buy Intel Core Ultra 5 235H if...

Choose the Intel Core Ultra 5 235H if you want superior benchmark performance in a laptop, with higher PassMark scores, faster RAM speeds up to 8400 MHz, PCIe 5 connectivity, and more advanced DirectX 12 Ultimate integrated graphics.