AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 VS AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395

At a foundational level, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 share a strong common platform: both are built on a 4 nm process node, support 64-bit computing, include integrated graphics, and use PCIe 4.0 — meaning neither offers an architectural edge in connectivity or manufacturing refinement. Both also share an identical 100 °C maximum CPU temperature ceiling, so thermal throttling behavior is governed by the same junction limit.

The single and most consequential differentiator in this group is Thermal Design Power (TDP). The Ryzen AI 7 350 is rated at 28W, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 runs at 55W — nearly double. In practice, TDP directly reflects how much sustained performance a chip can deliver before hitting its power budget. A higher TDP generally means more headroom for compute-intensive workloads, but it also demands better cooling, draws more battery, and generates more heat in a chassis. The 395 is clearly positioned for high-performance systems where thermal and power delivery infrastructure can support it, while the 350 is tuned for efficiency-first designs — thinner laptops, fanless form factors, or longer battery life scenarios.

Overall, the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 holds a clear advantage in this group for users who prioritize peak sustained performance, given its significantly higher TDP envelope. The Ryzen AI 7 350, however, has the edge for power-constrained or thermally limited use cases. The choice between them in this context is fundamentally a trade-off between performance ceiling and efficiency.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 differ notably in their core configurations and processing speeds. The Ryzen AI 7 350 features a CPU speed of 4 x 2 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz, with a turbo clock speed of 5GHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 operates at a higher base CPU speed of 16 x 3 GHz, with a turbo clock speed of 5.1GHz. The Ryzen AI 7 350 has 16 threads, whereas the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 doubles that count with 32 threads, providing potential advantages in multi-threaded performance.

In terms of cache, the Ryzen AI 7 350 offers 8 MB of L2 cache and 16 MB of L3 cache, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 has 16 MB of L2 cache and a significantly larger 64 MB of L3 cache, which could impact performance in data-heavy tasks.

Additionally, the Ryzen AI 7 350 uses big.LITTLE technology, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 does not. The Ryzen AI 7 350 also has a clock multiplier of 20, compared to the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395's higher multiplier of 30. Despite these differences, both products have locked multipliers and do not support unlocked overclocking.

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 show clear differences in benchmark results. The Ryzen AI 7 350 has a PassMark result of 34,459, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 outperforms it with a higher result of 52,016. For single-threaded performance, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 3,878, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 scores slightly higher at 4,138.

In overclocked conditions, the Ryzen AI 7 350 reaches a PassMark result of 24,477, significantly lower than the 57,737 achieved by the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395. This indicates a noticeable performance boost in overclocked states for the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395, with a much higher performance ceiling.

These results highlight a substantial performance gap between the two processors, with the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 showing higher overall scores, both in standard and overclocked conditions, compared to the Ryzen AI 7 350.

Both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 feature integrated Radeon graphics, but there are differences in the specific GPU models and their performance characteristics. The Ryzen AI 7 350 is equipped with the Radeon 860M GPU, which can turbo boost up to 3000 MHz. In comparison, the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 has the Radeon 8060S GPU, which has a slightly lower turbo clock speed of 2900 MHz.

Both processors support DirectX 12, OpenGL 4.6, and have four supported displays, ensuring compatibility with modern graphics APIs and multi-display setups. However, the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 supports OpenCL 3, while the Ryzen AI 7 350 supports OpenCL 2.1. This difference in OpenCL versions could result in slight differences in performance for applications that leverage OpenCL.

Overall, the two products share many similarities in integrated graphics features, but the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 offers a slightly newer OpenCL version, which could be beneficial for certain workloads.

Both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 support a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz and are compatible with DDR5 memory. However, the two products differ in their memory channel configurations and capacities. The Ryzen AI 7 350 supports two memory channels, while the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 supports four channels, potentially offering more efficient memory access.

In terms of maximum memory capacity, the Ryzen AI 7 350 can support up to 256GB of memory, whereas the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 is limited to 128GB. Additionally, the Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 supports ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, which is not supported by the Ryzen AI 7 350.

These differences in memory channels, capacity, and ECC support could influence how the processors perform in memory-intensive tasks and applications that require high levels of memory reliability.

Both the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus Pro 395 feature identical instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern software and optimizations. Both processors also support multithreading, which allows for better performance in parallel tasks.

Additionally, both products are equipped with the NX bit, which provides enhanced security by preventing certain types of attacks that exploit memory vulnerabilities.

Overall, the features of both processors in this group are exactly the same, with no differences between the two models.