TurboVS
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T. These two processors take notably different approaches across key areas including thermal efficiency, cache architecture, integrated graphics performance, and memory support. Whether you are building a compact desktop, evaluating platform flexibility, or chasing the best benchmark scores, this head-to-head breakdown will help you understand exactly where each chip excels and where it falls short.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both products include integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both products support 64-bit computing.
  • ✓ Neither product has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ Both products use big.LITTLE technology.
  • ✓ Both products support DirectX 12 on their integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both products support up to 4 displays via integrated graphics.
  • ✓ Both products use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both products feature 2 memory channels.
  • ✓ Both products share the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Both products feature the NX bit security technology.

Main Differences

  • • The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 is available for both laptop and desktop platforms, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is designed for desktop only.
  • • Thermal Design Power (TDP) is 28W on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 35W on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • The semiconductor size is 4 nm on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 3 nm on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • The maximum CPU temperature is 100°C on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 105°C on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • PCI Express version is 4 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 5 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • CPU base speed is 4 x 2 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350, and 8 x 1.5 GHz and 12 x 1.2 GHz on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • CPU threads number 16 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 20 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • Turbo clock speed reaches 5 GHz on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 5.3 GHz on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • L2 cache is 8 MB on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 36 MB on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • The clock multiplier is 20 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 15 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • The PassMark multi-core result is 34459 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 36838 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • The PassMark single-core result is 3878 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 4624 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • Integrated GPU base clock speed is 400 MHz on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 300 MHz on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • Integrated GPU turbo clock speed is 3000 MHz on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 1950 MHz on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • OpenGL version supported is 4.6 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 4.5 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • OpenCL version supported is 2.1 on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 3 on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • Maximum RAM speed is 8000 MHz on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 6400 MHz on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • Maximum memory capacity is 256 GB on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and 192 GB on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T.
  • • ECC memory support is available on the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T but not on the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Desktop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 28W 35W
semiconductor size 4 nm 3 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 105 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 5
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

The most fundamental distinction between these two processors is deployment scope: the Ryzen AI 7 350 is designed for both laptop and desktop platforms, while the Core Ultra 7 265T is desktop-only. This gives AMD's chip a clear versatility edge if the use case extends beyond a traditional desktop build.

On the efficiency front, the Ryzen AI 7 350 operates at a 28W TDP versus the Core Ultra 7 265T's 35W — a 25% gap that matters significantly in thermally constrained or fanless builds, and is a key reason AMD can target laptops at all. Intel counters with a slightly more advanced 3 nm process node versus AMD's 4 nm, and supports PCIe 5.0 compared to AMD's PCIe 4.0, which translates to double the theoretical bandwidth for next-gen NVMe SSDs and discrete GPUs. Intel also tolerates a marginally higher peak CPU temperature (105 °C vs 100 °C), giving its cooler slightly more headroom under sustained loads.

Both processors share integrated graphics support and full 64-bit compatibility, so those are non-factors here. Overall, the Core Ultra 7 265T has the edge in a pure desktop context — offering a newer process node and future-proof PCIe 5.0 connectivity — but the Ryzen AI 7 350 wins on platform flexibility and power efficiency, making it the stronger choice for anyone prioritizing low thermal output or cross-platform deployment.

Performance:
CPU speed 4 x 2 & 4 x 2 GHz 8 x 1.5 & 12 x 1.2 GHz
CPU threads 16 threads 20 threads
turbo clock speed 5GHz 5.3GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 8 MB 36 MB
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✓ ✓
clock multiplier 20 15

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T both feature big.LITTLE technology, allowing them to optimize power efficiency by using a mix of performance and efficiency cores. The Ryzen AI 7 350 has a CPU speed configuration of 4 cores at 2 GHz and 4 cores at 2 GHz, totaling 8 cores, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T operates with 8 cores at 1.5 GHz and 12 cores at 1.2 GHz, totaling 20 cores. This results in a significant difference in core count, with the Intel processor offering more threads (20 threads) compared to the AMD processor's 16 threads.

Both processors feature turbo clock speeds that are quite close, with the Ryzen AI 7 350 reaching a maximum of 5 GHz and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T peaking at 5.3 GHz. Despite this minor difference in turbo speed, the Intel processor has more cores, which could provide an advantage in multi-threaded tasks.

In terms of cache, the Ryzen AI 7 350 comes with 8 MB of L2 cache, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has a significantly larger 36 MB of L2 cache, which may improve performance in data-heavy applications. Both processors have a fixed clock multiplier: 20 for the Ryzen and 15 for the Intel, which directly correlates to their respective base speeds and performance characteristics.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 34459 36838
PassMark result (single) 3878 4624

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T show differences in their benchmark results. The Ryzen AI 7 350 has a total PassMark result of 34,459, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T scores higher with a result of 36,838. This indicates that the Intel processor outperforms the AMD processor in overall multi-threaded performance.

For single-core performance, the Ryzen AI 7 350 scores 3,878, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T achieves a higher single-core score of 4,624. This shows that the Intel processor also has a significant advantage in single-threaded tasks.

In summary, both processors perform well in benchmarks, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T leading in both overall and single-core results compared to the Ryzen AI 7 350.

Integrated graphics:
GPU clock speed 400 MHz 300 MHz
GPU turbo 3000 MHz 1950 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.5
OpenCL version 2.1 3

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T both feature integrated graphics with similar support for modern APIs. Both processors support DirectX 12 and have the ability to drive up to 4 displays. However, there are differences in other specs. The Ryzen AI 7 350 has a GPU clock speed of 400 MHz, with a turbo boost up to 3000 MHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T has a lower GPU clock speed of 300 MHz, with a turbo boost up to 1950 MHz.

When it comes to OpenGL and OpenCL, the Ryzen AI 7 350 supports OpenGL version 4.6 and OpenCL version 2.1, whereas the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T supports OpenGL version 4.5 and OpenCL version 3. This means the Ryzen processor has a slightly higher OpenGL version, while the Intel processor offers a newer OpenCL version.

Overall, the two processors are fairly similar in terms of integrated graphics capabilities, with differences in GPU clock speeds, OpenGL/OpenCL versions, and the specific boost capabilities of their GPUs.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 8000 MHz 6400 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 2 2
maximum memory amount 256GB 192GB
Supports ECC memory ✕ ✓

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T both support DDR5 memory and utilize dual memory channels, but there are differences in memory capacity, speed, and ECC support. The Ryzen AI 7 350 can support a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T is limited to a maximum RAM speed of 6400 MHz.

In terms of memory capacity, the Ryzen processor can accommodate up to 256GB of RAM, while the Intel processor supports a maximum of 192GB of RAM. This gives the Ryzen a higher memory ceiling for demanding applications that require more RAM.

Additionally, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T supports ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, which is not supported by the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350. ECC memory is useful in applications that require high reliability and error-free processing, such as servers and workstations.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T have identical instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. This means both processors support a wide range of instruction sets commonly used in modern computing for tasks such as multimedia processing and encryption.

Both processors also feature the NX bit, which helps improve security by preventing the execution of certain types of malicious code in memory.

Overall, the feature sets for the Ryzen AI 7 350 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265T are identical, offering the same instruction sets and security feature with the NX bit.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining all available specifications, both processors prove to be capable modern chips, yet each suits a different audience. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 stands out with its lower 28W TDP, significantly faster integrated GPU turbo of 3000 MHz, higher maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz, and broader platform flexibility covering both laptop and desktop form factors, making it an appealing choice for users who value energy efficiency and graphics responsiveness. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265T, on the other hand, delivers stronger raw CPU performance with a higher turbo clock of 5.3 GHz, a vastly larger 36 MB L2 cache, superior single-core benchmark scores, PCIe 5 support, and ECC memory compatibility, positioning it as the better fit for demanding desktop workloads and professional reliability requirements.

AMD Ryzen AI 7 350
Buy AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 if you need a power-efficient processor for both laptop and desktop platforms, want faster integrated GPU performance, or require support for higher RAM speeds up to 8000 MHz.

Intel Core Ultra 7 265T
Buy Intel Core Ultra 7 265T if...

Buy the Intel Core Ultra 7 265T if you prioritize stronger single-core and multi-core CPU performance, a much larger L2 cache, PCIe 5 support, or ECC memory compatibility for a professional desktop build.