AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 VS AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395

In terms of general characteristics, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 are completely identical across every spec in this group. Both are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors, feature integrated graphics, share a 55W TDP, are built on a 4 nm process node, max out at a 100 °C CPU temperature ceiling, support PCIe 4.0, and are fully 64-bit compatible.

The shared 4 nm semiconductor size is noteworthy — it places both chips in the modern efficiency tier, enabling a relatively compact die with strong performance-per-watt. The 55W TDP positions them as high-performance mobile processors that can also serve in compact desktop applications, striking a balance between sustained throughput and thermal manageability. PCIe 4.0 support ensures compatibility with current-generation NVMe storage and discrete add-in cards without being a bandwidth bottleneck for typical workloads.

For this specific group, these two processors are in a dead tie — there is no differentiator whatsoever. Users comparing them solely on general platform characteristics will find no reason to prefer one over the other; the distinction between these chips must be sought in other spec groups such as CPU cores, GPU configuration, or memory support.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 differ significantly in their performance specifications. The Ryzen AI Max 385 has a CPU speed of 8 x 3.6 GHz and 16 threads, whereas the Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 boasts a higher CPU speed with 16 x 3 GHz and 32 threads. This indicates that the Max Plus 395 has a greater number of threads, which could suggest better multitasking performance, despite a slightly lower individual core clock speed compared to the Max 385.

When it comes to turbo clock speed, the Max 385 can reach 5 GHz, while the Max Plus 395 slightly exceeds this with a turbo clock speed of 5.1 GHz. Both processors have the same clock multiplier of 36 for the Max 385 and 30 for the Max Plus 395, which directly affects how their cores scale under load.

As for cache, the Max 385 features 8 MB of L2 cache, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 640 KB of L1 cache. In comparison, the Max Plus 395 comes with 16 MB of L2 cache, 64 MB of L3 cache, and 1280 KB of L1 cache. This shows that the Max Plus 395 has a clear advantage in cache size, which could enhance its performance in memory-intensive tasks. Both models use a 1 MB/core allocation for L2 cache and a 4 MB/core allocation for L3 cache. Neither product uses big.LITTLE technology, and both have an unlocked multiplier setting as false.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 show a significant difference in benchmark results. The Max 385 has a PassMark result of 18,441 and a single-threaded result of 2,056. In comparison, the Max Plus 395 achieves a much higher PassMark result of 54,021, with a single-threaded result of 4,142. This indicates that the Max Plus 395 performs considerably better in both overall and single-threaded tasks, with its PassMark result being nearly three times higher than that of the Max 385.

Both processors demonstrate strong performance, but the larger disparity in the multi-core PassMark result highlights the Max Plus 395's superior performance in workloads that can take advantage of its additional threads and cores.

Overall, these benchmark scores emphasize a clear performance gap between the two models, with the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 significantly outperforming the Max 385 in both multi-core and single-core tests.

The integrated graphics in the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 show some key differences. The Max 385 features a GPU clock speed of 2800 MHz with the Radeon 8050S, while the Max Plus 395 has a lower GPU clock speed of 1295 MHz but comes with the Radeon 8060S. Both processors have the same number of supported displays, at 4, and support the same OpenGL (4.6) and OpenCL (3) versions. The Max 385 and Max Plus 395 both support DirectX, but the Max 385 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, while the Max Plus 395 supports DirectX 12.

The Max 385’s GPU turbo frequency is 2800 MHz, matching its base GPU clock speed, while the Max Plus 395 has a slightly higher GPU turbo speed of 2900 MHz. This suggests the Max Plus 395 may offer a slightly higher peak graphics performance during intensive tasks, although its base GPU clock speed is significantly lower.

In summary, while both processors offer solid integrated graphics, the Max 385 stands out with its higher GPU clock speed and DirectX 12 Ultimate support, while the Max Plus 395 compensates with a higher GPU turbo speed and the newer Radeon 8060S GPU.

The memory specifications for the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 are identical across all key aspects. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz and are compatible with DDR5 memory. They also feature four memory channels and support a maximum memory capacity of 128GB. Additionally, both products support ECC memory (Error Correcting Code), which helps ensure data integrity in memory-intensive applications.

As both models share the same memory configuration, there are no differences between the two in this specification group.

Overall, the memory capabilities of the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 are effectively identical, offering the same maximum speed, capacity, and support for ECC memory.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 are identical in terms of features. Both processors support the same instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. Additionally, both models utilize multithreading and include the NX bit, which provides protection against certain types of malware.

There are no differences in the feature sets between the two models in this group, as both products offer the same capabilities for instruction sets, multithreading, and security features.

In summary, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 are equivalent in terms of the features provided, with no variation in supported instruction sets or additional features.