TurboVS
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390. Both processors share the same 55W TDP, 4 nm architecture, and Radeon 8050S integrated graphics, yet they take notably different approaches to core count, cache hierarchy, and raw multi-threaded throughput. Whether you prioritize clock speed efficiency or sheer parallel processing muscle, this comparison breaks down every key battleground to help you make an informed decision.

Common Features

  • ✓ Both products are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors.
  • ✓ Integrated graphics are available on both products.
  • ✓ Both products have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 55W.
  • ✓ Both products are manufactured on a 4 nm semiconductor process.
  • ✓ The maximum CPU temperature is 100 °C on both products.
  • ✓ Both products use PCIe version 4.
  • ✓ 64-bit support is available on both products.
  • ✓ The turbo clock speed reaches 5 GHz on both products.
  • ✓ Neither product has an unlocked multiplier.
  • ✓ The L2 cache per core is 1 MB/core on both products.
  • ✓ Neither product uses big.LITTLE technology.
  • ✓ Both products feature the Radeon 8050S integrated GPU.
  • ✓ The GPU turbo frequency is 2800 MHz on both products.
  • ✓ Both products support up to 4 simultaneous displays.
  • ✓ OpenGL version 4.6 is supported on both products.
  • ✓ OpenCL version 3 is supported on both products.
  • ✓ The maximum RAM speed is 8000 MHz on both products.
  • ✓ Both products use DDR5 memory.
  • ✓ Both products feature 4 memory channels.
  • ✓ The maximum memory capacity is 128 GB on both products.
  • ✓ ECC memory support is available on both products.
  • ✓ Both products support the same instruction sets: MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2.
  • ✓ Multithreading is supported on both products.
  • ✓ The NX bit security feature is present on both products.

Main Differences

  • • CPU speed is 8 x 3.6 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 12 x 3.2 GHz on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • CPU threads total 16 on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 24 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • L1 cache is 640 KB on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 960 KB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • L2 cache is 8 MB on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 12 MB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • L3 cache is 32 MB on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 64 MB on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • L3 cache per core is 4 MB/core on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 5.33 MB/core on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • The clock multiplier is 36 on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 32 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • The PassMark multi-core result is 18441 on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 43189 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • The PassMark single-core result is 2056 on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and 3997 on AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390.
  • • DirectX 12 Ultimate support is present on AMD Ryzen AI Max 385, while AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 supports DirectX 12.
Specs Comparison
AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390

General info:
Type Laptop, Desktop Laptop, Desktop
Has integrated graphics ✓ ✓
release date January 2025 January 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55W 55W
semiconductor size 4 nm 4 nm
CPU temperature 100 °C 100 °C
PCI Express (PCIe) version 4 4
Supports 64-bit ✓ ✓

In terms of general characteristics, the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 are completely identical across every spec in this group. Both are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors, both integrate graphics on-chip, and both are built on a 4 nm semiconductor process — a modern node that balances high transistor density with power efficiency.

From a power and thermal standpoint, both chips share a 55W TDP and a maximum CPU temperature of 100 °C, meaning system integrators will face the same cooling and power delivery requirements regardless of which processor they choose. Both also support PCIe 4.0 and 64-bit computing, ensuring compatibility with current-generation storage, GPUs, and operating systems.

Based strictly on the data in this group, these two processors are in a complete tie. There is no differentiator here that would favor one over the other — buyers should look to other spec groups such as CPU core counts, GPU compute units, or memory configuration to find meaningful distinctions between the two.

Performance:
CPU speed 8 x 3.6 GHz 12 x 3.2 GHz
CPU threads 16 threads 24 threads
turbo clock speed 5GHz 5GHz
Has an unlocked multiplier ✕ ✕
L2 cache 8 MB 12 MB
L3 cache 32 MB 64 MB
L1 cache 640 KB 960 KB
L2 core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
L3 core 4 MB/core 5.33 MB/core
Uses big.LITTLE technology ✕ ✕
clock multiplier 36 32

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 differ in several key performance specifications. The Ryzen AI Max 385 features 8 CPU cores running at a base speed of 3.6 GHz, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 offers 12 CPU cores at a base speed of 3.2 GHz. This gives the Pro version a higher core count, which may be advantageous for multitasking and parallel processing, though its individual core speed is slightly lower than the 385's.

In terms of threading, the 385 has 16 threads, while the 390 doubles this with 24 threads, potentially enhancing its performance in threaded workloads. Both processors feature a turbo clock speed of 5 GHz, allowing for a temporary performance boost under heavy load.

Cache sizes also differ: the 385 comes with 8 MB of L2 cache, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 640 KB of L1 cache. The 390, on the other hand, has 12 MB of L2 cache, 64 MB of L3 cache, and 960 KB of L1 cache. The L2 and L3 caches of the 390 are notably larger, which could lead to improved data access speeds. Both processors have identical L2 and L3 cache sizes per core (1 MB/core and 4 MB/core, respectively, for the 385, and 1 MB/core and 5.33 MB/core for the 390). Neither processor supports big.LITTLE technology, and both have a locked multiplier, with the 385's clock multiplier set to 36 and the 390's set to 32.

Benchmarks:
PassMark result 18441 43189
PassMark result (single) 2056 3997

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 show significant differences in their benchmark results. The Ryzen AI Max 385 has a PassMark score of 18,441, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 achieves a much higher score of 43,189, indicating a notable difference in overall processing power between the two.

When looking at single-threaded performance, the Ryzen AI Max 385 scores 2,056, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 scores 3,997. This difference suggests that the Pro version performs better in tasks that rely on single-core performance as well.

In summary, the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 outperforms the Ryzen AI Max 385 in both overall and single-threaded benchmark results, with a substantial margin in both areas.

Integrated graphics:
GPU name Radeon 8050S Radeon 8050S
GPU turbo 2800 MHz 2800 MHz
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12
supported displays 4 4
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3

Both the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 feature the same integrated GPU, the Radeon 8050S, with a turbo speed of 2800 MHz. They also share the same OpenGL and OpenCL versions, both supporting OpenGL 4.6 and OpenCL 3.

The key difference between the two is in the DirectX version supported. The Ryzen AI Max 385 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, while the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 supports DirectX 12. Additionally, both processors are capable of supporting up to 4 displays, with no difference in this specification.

Overall, the integrated graphics in both models are largely identical, with the only distinction being the DirectX version, where the 385 has the more advanced DirectX 12 Ultimate support compared to the 390's DirectX 12.

Memory:
RAM speed (max) 8000 MHz 8000 MHz
DDR memory version 5 5
memory channels 4 4
maximum memory amount 128GB 128GB
Supports ECC memory ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 have identical memory specifications. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz and are compatible with DDR5 memory. They each feature 4 memory channels and support a maximum memory amount of 128 GB.

Additionally, both processors support Error Correcting Code (ECC) memory, ensuring data integrity for critical applications.

In summary, there are no differences between the memory capabilities of the Ryzen AI Max 385 and the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390; both processors share the same specifications in this area.

Features:
instruction sets MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2 MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, SSE 4.2
uses multithreading ✓ ✓
Has NX bit ✓ ✓

The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 and AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 share identical features in this group. Both processors support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. Additionally, both processors are capable of multithreading, which allows them to handle multiple tasks simultaneously, improving efficiency in threaded applications.

Both the Ryzen AI Max 385 and the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 also include the NX bit, a security feature that helps protect against certain types of malware by preventing the execution of code in specific areas of memory.

In summary, the features of the Ryzen AI Max 385 and the Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 are identical, with both processors supporting the same instruction sets, multithreading, and NX bit security.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After examining the full specification breakdown, a clear picture emerges for each processor. The AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 offers 8 cores at a higher 3.6 GHz base clock and a clock multiplier of 36, making it a solid choice for workloads that benefit from faster per-core speed within the same 55W power envelope. The AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390, on the other hand, steps up significantly with 12 cores, 64 MB of L3 cache, and a PassMark multi-core score of 43189 versus 18441, demonstrating a commanding lead in heavily threaded tasks. Both share identical memory support, ECC capability, and integrated GPU fundamentals, so the decision ultimately comes down to workload type: single-threaded responsiveness versus multi-core throughput and cache capacity.

AMD Ryzen AI Max 385
Buy AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385 if you prioritize a higher base clock speed and strong single-threaded performance within a power-efficient 55W design.

AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390
Buy AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 if...

Buy the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 390 if you need superior multi-threaded performance, a larger cache hierarchy, and significantly higher benchmark scores for demanding parallel workloads.