AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 VS AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385

In terms of general architecture, the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 are remarkably similar at the platform level. Both are designed for Laptop and Desktop form factors, feature integrated graphics, operate on a 4 nm semiconductor process, share an identical 55W TDP, and top out at the same 100 °C junction temperature. They also both support PCIe 4.0 and 64-bit computing.

The practical implications of these shared fundamentals are significant: the 4 nm node ensures both chips deliver a strong balance of performance-per-watt, while the 55W TDP means system integrators can use similar cooling and power delivery designs across both SKUs. The identical thermal ceiling of 100 °C indicates they share the same thermal headroom and throttling behavior under sustained load.

Based strictly on the general info specs provided, these two processors are in a complete tie — there is no differentiating factor in this category. Buyers should look to other spec groups, such as core counts, clock speeds, or GPU compute units, to identify where the two chips diverge.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 differ significantly in their CPU speeds and overall threading capabilities. The Plus 395 has a CPU speed of 16 x 3 GHz, with 32 threads, while the Pro 385 operates at a higher base clock of 8 x 3.6 GHz, but with only 16 threads.

In terms of turbo clock speed, the Plus 395 can reach up to 5.1GHz, slightly surpassing the Pro 385's maximum turbo speed of 5GHz. Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier, but neither of them has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking would be restricted.

When looking at cache sizes, the Plus 395 has larger caches: 16 MB of L2 cache, 64 MB of L3 cache, and 1280 KB of L1 cache, compared to the Pro 385's 8 MB of L2 cache, 32 MB of L3 cache, and 640 KB of L1 cache. Both processors have a core-based allocation of 1 MB for L2 cache and 4 MB for L3 cache per core. Lastly, neither model uses big.LITTLE technology, and both have clock multipliers set at 30 for the Plus 395 and 36 for the Pro 385.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 show a notable difference in their overall PassMark benchmark results. The Plus 395 achieves a PassMark score of 54021, while the Pro 385 scores 33441, indicating that the Plus 395 has a significantly higher overall performance in multi-threaded tasks.

For single-threaded performance, the Plus 395 scores 4142, which is slightly higher than the Pro 385's 4052. While the gap in single-thread performance is smaller, the Plus 395 still maintains a lead in both single and multi-threaded benchmarks.

These results highlight a clear performance disparity, with the Plus 395 outperforming the Pro 385 in both multi-threaded and single-threaded tests based on the provided PassMark scores.

The integrated graphics of the AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 show some differences. The Plus 395 is equipped with a Radeon 8060S GPU, while the Pro 385 features a Radeon 8050S GPU. Both processors support the same versions of DirectX (12), OpenGL (4.6), and OpenCL (3), meaning their software compatibility is identical.

In terms of GPU performance, the Plus 395 has a higher turbo clock speed of 2900 MHz, compared to the Pro 385's 2800 MHz. Both processors support up to 4 displays, which ensures they are both capable of driving multiple monitors.

These differences in GPU model and turbo speed may lead to slightly different graphics performance, with the Plus 395 offering a higher potential GPU frequency, though both are quite similar in most other aspects.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 are identical in terms of memory specifications. Both processors support a maximum RAM speed of 8000 MHz, use DDR5 memory, and feature 4 memory channels. They also share the same maximum memory amount of 128GB and both support ECC memory for improved data integrity.

Since these specifications are identical between the two products, there are no differences in memory capabilities, offering the same potential for memory performance and stability in both models.

The AMD Ryzen AI Max Plus 395 and the AMD Ryzen AI Max Pro 385 are identical in terms of features. Both processors support the same set of instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. This ensures they can handle a wide range of tasks and modern software efficiently.

Both products also use multithreading, allowing them to execute multiple threads simultaneously, improving performance in multi-core applications. Additionally, both processors include the NX bit feature, providing enhanced security by preventing the execution of certain types of malicious code.

Since all feature specifications match between the two models, there are no differences in their supported instruction sets, multithreading capabilities, or security features.