Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max VS Ulefone RugKing

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing differ in several design aspects. For starters, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is waterproof with an IP68 rating, allowing it to withstand immersion up to 6 meters deep, while the Ulefone RugKing also features an IP68 rating but with a lower waterproof depth of 2 meters. In terms of weight, the iPhone is significantly lighter at 233 g compared to the Ulefone’s 397 g, making the iPhone easier to handle. The iPhone’s dimensions are more compact, measuring 163.4 mm in height, 78 mm in width, and 8.75 mm in thickness, while the Ulefone is larger, with a height of 173.4 mm, width of 83.4 mm, and a thicker profile of 18.3 mm.

Another key difference is in volume: the Ulefone has a much bulkier design with a volume of 264.6465 cm³, whereas the iPhone is more streamlined with a volume of 111.5205 cm³. The Ulefone also boasts a rugged build, which the iPhone lacks, making the RugKing more suited for tough environments. Neither phone can be folded, so both are standard, rigid designs.

In summary, the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max is lighter, slimmer, and more compact, with a higher waterproof depth, while the Ulefone RugKing is heavier, thicker, and more rugged but offers a slightly lower waterproof capability.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing display differ significantly in various aspects. The iPhone features an OLED/AMOLED display with a screen size of 6.9 inches, while the Ulefone has a smaller 5.99-inch LCD, IPS display. The iPhone's display boasts a higher pixel density of 460 ppi, providing sharper images, compared to the Ulefone's 269 ppi. The resolution is also much higher on the iPhone at 1320 x 2868 px, whereas the Ulefone has a resolution of 720 x 1440 px, resulting in a less detailed display.

In terms of refresh rate, the iPhone supports a smooth 120Hz, which is significantly higher than the Ulefone’s 60Hz, meaning the iPhone’s screen offers smoother visuals, especially during fast-moving content. The iPhone also supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision, enhancing color and contrast in compatible content, while the Ulefone does not support either HDR10 or Dolby Vision. The iPhone features an Always-On Display, a feature not available on the Ulefone.

When it comes to durability, the Ulefone RugKing has branded damage-resistant glass, while the iPhone does not. Both devices support touch input, and neither has a secondary screen. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max offers a more advanced and feature-rich display compared to the Ulefone RugKing, with superior resolution, refresh rate, and HDR support.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing differ significantly in their performance specifications. The iPhone is equipped with 2048GB of internal storage, vastly surpassing the RugKing’s 256GB. The iPhone also comes with 12GB of RAM, while the Ulefone has 8GB of RAM. In terms of chipset, the iPhone features the Apple A19 Pro, while the RugKing uses the Unisoc T7255 chipset. The iPhone's CPU operates at a higher speed, with 2 cores running at 4.26 GHz and 4 cores at 2.51 GHz, while the RugKing's CPU runs at 2 GHz for 2 cores and 1.8 GHz for 6 cores.

Both phones use big.LITTLE technology, but the iPhone's 6 CPU threads differ from the RugKing’s 8 threads. The iPhone’s RAM speed is notably faster at 4800 MHz, compared to the RugKing’s 1866 MHz. The iPhone also has a significantly smaller 3 nm semiconductor size, while the RugKing has a 12 nm semiconductor size. The maximum memory bandwidth is much higher on the iPhone at 78.8 GB/s, whereas the RugKing’s maximum is 14.928 GB/s. Additionally, the iPhone supports a maximum of 12GB of RAM, while the RugKing supports a maximum of 14GB of RAM, although it currently has only 8GB installed.

Both devices support 64-bit architecture and have integrated LTE, integrated graphics, and TrustZone, with no notable differences in those aspects. In summary, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is equipped with a far more powerful chipset, faster RAM, and higher storage capacity, while the Ulefone RugKing offers a more modest setup in comparison.

The camera setups on the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing are quite different in both specifications and features. The iPhone boasts a triple-lens main camera system with 48 MP sensors for all three lenses, while the RugKing has a dual-lens setup with a 50 MP main camera and a secondary 2 MP lens. The iPhone's front camera is an 18 MP sensor, significantly higher than the Ulefone's 8 MP front camera. The iPhone also supports optical zoom at 8x, which the Ulefone lacks (0x optical zoom).

In terms of video recording, the iPhone supports high-definition 2160p video at 120 fps, while the RugKing is limited to 1080p at 30 fps. The iPhone also supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision recording, while the RugKing does not. The iPhone features a dual-tone LED flash with 2 LEDs, whereas the Ulefone has a single flash LED without the dual-tone feature. Additionally, the iPhone has built-in optical image stabilization (OIS), but the Ulefone lacks this feature.

Both phones have phase-detection autofocus and manual controls for exposure, ISO, and focus. The iPhone can shoot raw images and includes features like laser autofocus and manual shutter speed, while the Ulefone does not shoot raw photos, lacks laser autofocus, and does not offer manual shutter speed. Neither phone has a front-facing LED flash. Both devices can create panoramas, but only the iPhone can shoot 360° panoramas. Overall, the iPhone 17 Pro Max provides a significantly more advanced and feature-packed camera system compared to the Ulefone RugKing.

The operating systems of the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing offer some similar privacy and security features, but there are also notable differences. Both devices have clipboard warnings, location privacy options, and camera/microphone privacy options. The iPhone offers Mail Privacy Protection, which is not available on the Ulefone. Additionally, the iPhone blocks cross-site tracking, while the Ulefone does not. The iPhone has a range of privacy features like on-device machine learning and customizable notifications, while both devices support dark mode, focus modes (though not the same on both), and live text.

When it comes to user customization, the Ulefone allows theme customization and dynamic theming, which the iPhone does not. The Ulefone also supports split-screen functionality, while the iPhone does not. On the other hand, the iPhone supports Wi-Fi password sharing, a feature not available on the Ulefone. The Ulefone provides an extra dim mode, while the iPhone does not. The iPhone offers a battery health check, which is also found on the Ulefone.

In terms of device management, the iPhone has Quick Start and supports offloading apps, while the Ulefone lacks Quick Start. Both devices support widgets and have offline voice recognition and voice commands. The iPhone also has PiP (Picture-in-Picture), whereas the Ulefone does not. The Ulefone is a multi-user system, while the iPhone is not. The Ulefone is free and open source, while the iPhone is not. The Ulefone does not receive direct OS updates, unlike the iPhone.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing differ in their battery specifications. The iPhone features a 5088 mAh battery, while the RugKing has a much larger 9600 mAh battery. Both phones support fast charging, but the iPhone has a faster charging speed at 40W compared to the Ulefone’s 18W. The iPhone also supports wireless charging, a feature the Ulefone lacks. Neither phone has reverse wireless charging.

Both devices have rechargeable, non-removable batteries and include a battery level indicator. The iPhone does not come with a charger, whereas the Ulefone does. Both phones have a rechargeable battery and do not support removable batteries.

In summary, the Ulefone RugKing offers a larger battery capacity, while the iPhone 17 Pro Max provides faster charging and wireless charging support. Both devices offer similar basic features like fast charging support, battery indicators, and non-removable batteries.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing differ in their audio features. The iPhone lacks a 3.5 mm audio jack, whereas the Ulefone includes one. The iPhone is equipped with stereo speakers, while the Ulefone does not have stereo speakers. Neither device supports aptX, LDAC, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, or aptX Lossless for enhanced audio streaming. Additionally, the Ulefone has a radio, which the iPhone does not.

In summary, the iPhone 17 Pro Max offers stereo speakers but lacks a 3.5 mm audio jack and radio support, while the Ulefone provides a 3.5 mm audio jack and a radio but lacks stereo speakers.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing differ in several connectivity and feature specifications. The iPhone supports 5G, while the RugKing does not. In terms of Wi-Fi, the iPhone supports a wider range, including Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, Wi-Fi 4, Wi-Fi 6E, and Wi-Fi 7, while the RugKing is limited to Wi-Fi 4 and Wi-Fi 5. The iPhone uses 1 SIM and 1 eSIM, whereas the Ulefone supports 2 SIM cards.

Bluetooth on the iPhone is version 6, while the Ulefone uses Bluetooth 5. The iPhone offers faster download and upload speeds at 10000 MBits/s and 3500 MBits/s respectively, compared to the RugKing’s 300 MBits/s download and 100 MBits/s upload speeds. The iPhone also supports NFC, while the Ulefone does as well. Both devices have USB Type-C ports, though the iPhone supports USB version 3.2, while the RugKing supports version 2.

When it comes to sensors and features, the iPhone has more advanced capabilities, including infrared sensors, a barometer, and 3D facial recognition. The Ulefone lacks an infrared sensor and barometer, and it does not support 3D facial recognition. Both devices have a gyroscope, accelerometer, GPS, and compass. The iPhone has emergency SOS via satellite, crash detection, and supports Galileo, while these features are not available on the Ulefone. Additionally, the iPhone has a fingerprint scanner, while the Ulefone does as well, but the Ulefone lacks some of the more advanced connectivity features seen on the iPhone.

The Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max and Ulefone RugKing share a few similarities in their miscellaneous features. Both devices include a video light, which can be useful for improving lighting during video recording. Neither device has a sapphire glass display, a curved display, or an e-paper display.

In summary, the two phones are identical in these aspects, with both offering a video light and lacking sapphire glass, curved displays, and e-paper displays. There are no significant differences in this group between the two models.