Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition VS Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 have several key differences in terms of performance specs. The Asus 5050 OC has a GPU clock speed of 2317 MHz, which is slightly higher than the Inno3D 5060 Twin X2's clock speed of 2280 MHz. However, the Inno3D model offers a higher GPU turbo boost of 2497 MHz compared to the Asus's 2677 MHz.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 excels with a much higher pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s, compared to the Asus's 85.66 GPixel/s. Similarly, the Inno3D card also leads in floating-point performance, delivering 19.18 TFLOPS, whereas the Asus version provides 13.71 TFLOPS. For texture rate, the Inno3D card again performs better, offering 299.6 GTexels/s, while the Asus card is lower at 214.2 GTexels/s.

In terms of hardware, the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 has 3840 shading units, 120 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 48 render output units (ROPs), significantly surpassing the Asus card with 2560 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), which indicates that neither has a clear advantage in this area. Both cards also share the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 feature 8GB of VRAM, but they differ in other memory specifications. The Asus card uses GDDR6 memory with an effective memory speed of 20000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 320 GB/s. In comparison, the Inno3D card uses newer GDDR7 memory, which offers a significantly higher effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.

Both products have a memory bus width of 128-bit, and both support ECC memory, ensuring data integrity. Despite these similarities, the substantial difference in memory speed and bandwidth suggests that the Inno3D card has the potential for better performance in memory-intensive tasks.

Overall, the key distinction between these two products in the memory category is the use of GDDR7 with much higher memory speed and bandwidth in the Inno3D card, while the Asus card relies on GDDR6 with lower values in these areas.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 share identical specifications in the features category. Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL version 4.6, and OpenCL version 3, ensuring compatibility with the latest software and applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D features, which are key for high-quality gaming and graphics rendering.

Additionally, both cards are equipped with DLSS support and feature Intel Resizable BAR, which enhances memory management for better performance. Neither product includes XeSS (XMX) support, and both do not have LHR (Lite Hash Rate) functionality. In terms of aesthetics, neither card features RGB lighting.

Finally, both the Asus and Inno3D models can support up to four displays, providing flexibility for users who need multiple monitor setups for gaming or productivity tasks.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 offer similar port configurations. Each card includes one HDMI output with HDMI version 2.1b, ensuring support for high-quality video and gaming features. They also both have three DisplayPort outputs, providing flexibility for multi-monitor setups.

Neither card features USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, meaning both are limited to HDMI and DisplayPort connections for display purposes.

In summary, the Asus and Inno3D cards are identical in terms of available ports, offering a single HDMI output, three DisplayPorts, and no additional specialized display outputs like USB-C or mini DisplayPort.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 share the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and use a 5 nm semiconductor size. However, there are some differences in power and size. The Asus card has a lower Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 130W, while the Inno3D card has a higher TDP of 145W, indicating it may consume more power under load.

Both cards use PCI Express version 5, ensuring they are compatible with the latest motherboards and offer high-speed data transfer. In terms of transistors, the Asus card has 16.9 billion, while the Inno3D card has 21.9 billion, suggesting that the Inno3D card features more advanced processing capabilities in this regard.

When it comes to physical dimensions, the Asus card is 203 mm wide and 120.2 mm tall, while the Inno3D card is slightly wider at 225 mm but shorter at 116 mm. Neither product features air-water cooling, meaning both rely on traditional cooling methods. These differences may impact the fit and cooling setup depending on your system's space and requirements.