Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 VS MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC share similar specifications in terms of GPU clock speed, both having a base clock of 2317 MHz. However, the MSI model has a slightly higher GPU turbo boost, reaching 2632 MHz compared to the Asus's 2602 MHz. This gives the MSI a marginally higher turbo frequency for potentially better performance under load.

In terms of pixel rate, the MSI card offers 84.22 GPixel/s, which is slightly higher than the Asus's 83.26 GPixel/s. The floating-point performance for the two products also differs slightly, with the MSI model providing 13.48 TFLOPS, ahead of the Asus's 13.32 TFLOPS. Both products feature the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, as well as identical shading units (2560), texture mapping units (80), and render output units (32), ensuring similar fundamental processing power across both cards.

Both the Asus and MSI GPUs support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), meaning they both offer this advanced feature for more precise calculations in certain workloads. While their specs are very similar overall, the MSI card has a slight edge in terms of higher turbo speed, pixel rate, and floating-point performance.

The memory specifications of the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC are identical. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 20000 MHz, a maximum memory bandwidth of 320 GB/s, and 8GB of VRAM. Additionally, both utilize GDDR6 memory and have a memory bus width of 128-bit, which is standard for this class of GPUs.

Both products also support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring a higher level of stability by correcting minor memory errors automatically. Given that all the memory-related specs are the same between the two models, there is no distinction to be made in this category.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC share a nearly identical set of features. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3.0, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern software. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D rendering, and DLSS, providing robust performance for gaming and other graphical applications.

Neither product supports XeSS (XMX), but both are compatible with Intel Resizable BAR, which can help boost performance in certain games when paired with supported CPUs. Both cards also lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) features, making them suitable for cryptocurrency mining. However, the Asus model does not include RGB lighting, while the MSI card features RGB lighting for those seeking customizable aesthetic options.

Both products support up to four displays, offering flexibility for multi-monitor setups, but the key difference lies in the inclusion of RGB lighting on the MSI model, which is absent from the Asus card.

The port configurations of the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC are identical. Both models feature one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, as well as three DisplayPort outputs. Neither card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs. This means both cards offer the same basic connectivity options for modern displays and monitors.

With no differences in the number or type of ports, the two cards are on par in terms of available display outputs, making either choice equally suitable for multi-monitor setups that utilize HDMI and DisplayPort connections.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC share the same core specifications. They are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture, feature a 130W Thermal Design Power (TDP), and utilize a 5 nm semiconductor size with 16,900 million transistors. Both cards support PCI Express version 5, ensuring high-speed data transfer between the GPU and the rest of the system.

The cooling setup for both cards is air-based, as neither model features air-water cooling. In terms of physical dimensions, the Asus card has a width of 203 mm and a height of 120.2 mm, while the MSI card is slightly narrower at 202 mm and slightly shorter in height at 120 mm. These differences in size are minimal and should have little impact on fitting the cards into most PC cases.

Overall, the two cards are essentially identical in terms of architecture, power requirements, and cooling method, with only slight differences in physical size.