Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X have several key performance differences. The Asus card has a GPU clock speed of 2317 MHz, which is slightly higher than the MSI's 2280 MHz. However, the MSI card has a higher turbo boost of 2497 MHz, compared to the Asus's 2602 MHz, suggesting that the Asus card has a slightly better turbo potential.

In terms of pixel rate, the MSI card outperforms the Asus with a rate of 119.9 GPixel/s compared to the Asus's 83.26 GPixel/s. The MSI also leads in texture rate, delivering 299.6 GTexels/s compared to the Asus's 208.2 GTexels/s, indicating superior texture handling performance.

The MSI card boasts more shading units at 3840, compared to the Asus's 2560, which means the MSI can handle more complex rendering tasks simultaneously. It also features 120 texture mapping units (TMUs), while the Asus has only 80. Additionally, the MSI has 48 render output units (ROPs), while the Asus has 32, which contributes to its ability to output more pixels per clock cycle. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), so no differences appear in that regard. GPU memory speed is the same at 1750 MHz for both products.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X share the same VRAM size of 8GB, but there are notable differences in memory performance. The Asus card has an effective memory speed of 20000 MHz, while the MSI card has a significantly higher effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, which results in faster data transfer rates.

Additionally, the MSI card offers higher memory bandwidth, with a maximum of 448 GB/s compared to the Asus's 320 GB/s, providing greater throughput for demanding tasks. Both cards use a 128-bit memory bus width, so there is no difference in that aspect.

Both the Asus and MSI cards support Error-Correcting Code (ECC) memory, ensuring reliable data integrity. Furthermore, the Asus card uses GDDR6 memory, while the MSI card features the newer GDDR7 memory, which offers improvements in efficiency and speed, although both cards use the same VRAM size.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X share identical features across most categories. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL version 4.6, and OpenCL version 3, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern applications and games.

They both also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D rendering, as well as DLSS, making them suitable for advanced graphical features. In terms of extra technologies, both cards lack XeSS (XMX), which is not supported by either model. Additionally, both cards support Intel Resizable BAR, but neither offers support for AMD SAM.

Other shared features include the absence of LHR (Low Hash Rate) limitations, meaning both cards can be used for cryptocurrency mining without restrictions. Both also lack RGB lighting, focusing on functionality rather than aesthetics. Finally, both cards can support up to 4 displays simultaneously, offering flexibility for multi-monitor setups.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X offer similar port configurations. Each card includes one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, ensuring compatibility with the latest HDMI features.

Both cards also feature three DisplayPort outputs, providing ample options for multi-monitor setups. However, neither card includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, meaning they both lack some additional display options that might be available on other models.

In terms of overall connectivity, the port offerings are identical for both the Asus and MSI cards, with no significant differences between the two models.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5050 and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 2X feature the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and both use a 5 nm semiconductor size. However, the MSI card has a higher number of transistors, with 21900 million compared to the Asus's 16900 million, which may contribute to differences in performance.

The Thermal Design Power (TDP) also differs between the two models. The Asus card has a TDP of 130W, while the MSI card requires 145W, indicating that the MSI card may consume more power under load.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Asus card is slightly wider at 203 mm, while the MSI card is a bit more compact at 197 mm. The height for both cards is nearly identical, with the Asus measuring 120.2 mm and the MSI at 120 mm. Neither card includes air-water cooling, as both rely on traditional cooling methods.