Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition VS Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC have very similar specifications, with slight variations in some key performance areas. Both cards share the same GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz, with similar GPU turbo speeds—2535 MHz for the Asus card and 2512 MHz for the Gigabyte model. This small difference in turbo speeds likely won't result in noticeable performance changes under typical usage.

In terms of pixel rate, the Asus card has a slight edge with a rate of 121.7 GPixel/s, compared to the Gigabyte's 120.6 GPixel/s. Similarly, the texture rate is higher on the Asus model at 304.2 GTexels/s, whereas the Gigabyte card provides 301.4 GTexels/s. Both cards support the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, along with identical shading units (3840), texture mapping units (120), and render output units (48).

Both products support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), indicating their ability to handle high-precision calculations, which is a key feature for certain professional applications. The floating-point performance is also nearly identical, with the Asus card slightly ahead at 19.47 TFLOPS versus 19.29 TFLOPS for the Gigabyte model.

The memory specifications for the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC are identical across all key areas. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. They also each come with 8GB of VRAM, which is backed by GDDR7 memory and a 128-bit memory bus width.

Additionally, both the Asus and Gigabyte models support Error-Correcting Code (ECC) memory, ensuring greater data integrity for tasks that require high precision.

In conclusion, there is no difference in the memory specifications between these two models—they are fully matched in terms of memory speed, bandwidth, capacity, and features.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC are identical in terms of features. Both models support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of modern applications and games. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, which enhances visual fidelity and performance in supported games.

In terms of additional features, neither product supports XeSS (XMX), but both support Intel's Resizable BAR technology (also known as Intel SAM). Both models also lack LHR (Low Hash Rate), which means they are not restricted in cryptocurrency mining performance.

As for visual features, both the Asus and Gigabyte cards include RGB lighting, adding customizable aesthetics to the build. They also support up to 4 displays, allowing for a multi-monitor setup for increased productivity or gaming immersion.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC are identical in terms of ports and outputs. Both cards feature one HDMI output with support for HDMI 2.1b, which is the latest version offering higher bandwidth and features such as 4K at higher refresh rates. They also each have three DisplayPort outputs, but neither model includes USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

In summary, the port configurations of both the Asus and Gigabyte cards match perfectly, providing the same options for connecting monitors and displays.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 WindForce OC share many similarities in their general specifications. Both cards are based on the Blackwell GPU architecture and have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W, ensuring similar power consumption under load. They also both use PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 and are built on a 5 nm semiconductor process, with 21.9 billion transistors in each card.

There is a difference in the physical dimensions of the two cards. The Asus card is slightly larger, measuring 228 mm in width and 123 mm in height, while the Gigabyte card is more compact, at 199 mm in width and 116 mm in height.

Both products lack air-water cooling systems, indicating they rely on traditional air cooling methods.