Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition VS Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 feature a GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz, indicating similar baseline performance. However, the Inno3D model offers a slightly higher GPU turbo speed of 2497 MHz compared to the 2535 MHz turbo of the Asus variant. This difference could provide a marginal boost in performance under heavy loads for the Asus card.

When it comes to pixel rate, the Asus card leads slightly with 121.7 GPixel/s, while the Inno3D model comes in at 119.9 GPixel/s. The difference is minor but still worth noting for tasks like rendering and gaming performance.

In terms of floating-point performance, the Asus Dual RTX 5060 OC Edition delivers 19.47 TFLOPS, which is slightly ahead of the Inno3D's 19.18 TFLOPS. Both cards have an impressive texture rate of 304.2 GTexels/s (Asus) and 299.6 GTexels/s (Inno3D), which are closely matched. Both models also feature identical GPU memory speeds of 1750 MHz, shading units at 3840, texture mapping units (TMUs) at 120, and render output units (ROPs) at 48. Additionally, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), ensuring robust computational abilities for demanding tasks.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 are equipped with identical memory specifications. They both feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s, and 8GB of VRAM. Both models use the GDDR7 memory type and have a memory bus width of 128-bit.

Additionally, both graphics cards support ECC memory (Error-Correcting Code), which helps in maintaining memory integrity for more reliable performance during intensive tasks.

As the memory specs for both products are the same across all key areas, there are no differences to highlight in this category.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 both share the same key features. They both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL version 4.6, and OpenCL version 3. Additionally, both cards support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, offering high-end visual and performance features for gaming and creative tasks.

One difference between the two models is that the Asus card comes with RGB lighting, whereas the Inno3D model does not feature any RGB lighting. Other than that, both cards have the same support for Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR) and neither has LHR (Lite Hash Rate) capabilities, indicating they are not limited for cryptocurrency mining purposes.

Both models can support up to 4 displays, ensuring versatility for multi-monitor setups. Overall, their feature sets are very closely matched, with the main distinction being the RGB lighting present on the Asus variant.

Both the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 offer nearly identical port configurations. Both cards include 1 HDMI port, supporting HDMI 2.1b, and 3 DisplayPort outputs, allowing for versatile connectivity to monitors and displays.

Neither of the cards features USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, making their port offerings identical in these aspects.

Overall, both models are equipped with the same types and number of ports, offering a similar level of connectivity for external displays.

The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Inno3D GeForce RTX 5060 Twin X2 share the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, as well as identical specifications for thermal design power (TDP), which is 145W. Both cards also utilize the same PCIe version (5.0) and have a semiconductor size of 5 nm, with the same number of transistors, 21,900 million.

The two models also do not feature air-water cooling, meaning they rely on traditional cooling methods. However, their physical dimensions differ slightly. The Asus card has a width of 228 mm and a height of 123 mm, while the Inno3D model is a bit smaller, with a width of 225 mm and a height of 116 mm.

Overall, the specifications are very similar, with the main difference being the slight variance in size between the two cards.