Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB
Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB

Overview

Welcome to our in-depth specification comparison between the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB. Both cards are built on the same Blackwell architecture and share an identical memory configuration, yet they differ in key areas including boost clock speeds and physical dimensions. Read on to discover which card best suits your needs.

Common Features

  • Both cards share a base GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz.
  • Both cards have a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.
  • Both cards feature 4608 shading units.
  • Both cards include 144 texture mapping units (TMUs).
  • Both cards have 48 render output units (ROPs).
  • Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards use 16GB of GDDR7 memory.
  • Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz.
  • Both cards offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • Both cards use a 128-bit memory bus width.
  • ECC memory is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture.
  • Both cards have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 180W.
  • Both cards use a 5 nm semiconductor manufacturing process.
  • Both cards contain 21900 million transistors.
  • Both cards support PCIe version 5.
  • Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate.
  • Both cards support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • Both cards support OpenCL version 3.
  • Multi-display technology is supported on both cards.
  • Ray tracing is supported on both cards.
  • 3D support is available on both cards.
  • DLSS is supported on both cards.
  • XeSS (XMX) support is not available on either card.
  • Air-water cooling is not available on either card.
  • Both cards feature 1 HDMI 2.1b port.
  • Both cards feature 3 DisplayPort outputs.
  • Neither card includes USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

Main Differences

  • GPU turbo clock is 2602 MHz on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 2662 MHz on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
  • Pixel rate is 124.9 GPixel/s on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 127.8 GPixel/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
  • Floating-point performance is 23.98 TFLOPS on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 24.53 TFLOPS on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
  • Texture rate is 374.7 GTexels/s on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 383.3 GTexels/s on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
  • Card width is 229 mm on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 291.9 mm on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
  • Card height is 120 mm on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and 116.6 mm on Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB.
Specs Comparison
Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB

Performance:
GPU clock speed 2407 MHz 2407 MHz
GPU turbo 2602 MHz 2662 MHz
pixel rate 124.9 GPixel/s 127.8 GPixel/s
floating-point performance 23.98 TFLOPS 24.53 TFLOPS
texture rate 374.7 GTexels/s 383.3 GTexels/s
GPU memory speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
shading units 4608 4608
texture mapping units (TMUs) 144 144
render output units (ROPs) 48 48
Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)

At the foundation, both cards are built on identical silicon configurations: 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, and they share the same base clock of 2407 MHz and memory speed of 1750 MHz. This means any performance gap between them comes down entirely to boost clock behavior — not architectural differences.

That's where the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC pulls ahead. Its GPU turbo reaches 2662 MHz versus the Asus Dual's 2602 MHz — a 60 MHz advantage that flows directly into every computed metric. The Palit delivers 24.53 TFLOPS of floating-point throughput against the Asus's 23.98 TFLOPS, and its texture rate of 383.3 GTexels/s edges out the Asus's 374.7 GTexels/s. In practice, these differences translate to a roughly 2–2.3% theoretical compute advantage — meaningful on paper, but unlikely to produce a perceptible framerate gap in real gaming workloads.

The edge here belongs to the Palit Infinity 3 OC, strictly on the basis of its higher factory boost clock and the downstream gains it produces across all throughput metrics. Both cards support Double Precision Floating Point, which matters for compute and professional tasks. For pure gaming, the delta is slim enough that thermal behavior, power delivery, and cooling efficiency — not covered in this group — may matter more in practice than the clock speed gap alone.

Memory:
effective memory speed 28000 MHz 28000 MHz
maximum memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
VRAM 16GB 16GB
GDDR version GDDR7 GDDR7
memory bus width 128-bit 128-bit
Supports ECC memory

Memory is one area where these two cards are in complete lockstep. Both carry 16GB of GDDR7 running at an effective 28000 MHz across a 128-bit bus, producing 448 GB/s of peak bandwidth. Every single memory specification is identical — there is no differentiator to analyze here.

What is worth contextualizing is how capable this shared memory configuration actually is. GDDR7 represents a generational leap in memory efficiency, and 448 GB/s through a 128-bit interface is a strong result for that bus width — comparable to what GDDR6X achieved on wider 192-bit or 256-bit buses in prior generations. The 16GB capacity is also a meaningful step up for this GPU tier, providing headroom for high-resolution textures, large AI model inference, and future titles with increasing VRAM demands. ECC memory support on both cards is a quiet but useful inclusion for users doing compute or content creation workloads where data integrity matters.

This group is a straight tie. Whichever card a buyer chooses, they get an identical memory subsystem — the choice between the Asus Dual OC and the Palit Infinity 3 OC will have to be made on other grounds entirely.

Features:
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3
Supports multi-display technology
supports ray tracing
Supports 3D
supports DLSS
has XeSS (XMX)
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR
has LHR
has RGB lighting
supported displays 4 4

Feature parity is total between these two cards. Both run DirectX 12 Ultimate — the current gold standard for gaming APIs, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing, mesh shaders, and variable rate shading in supported titles. Alongside that, full ray tracing and DLSS support are present on both, which is particularly significant: DLSS allows AI-driven upscaling that can recover substantial performance headroom in demanding scenes, making it one of the most practically valuable features on any modern GeForce card.

Both cards also support up to 4 simultaneous displays and include Intel Resizable BAR, which allows the CPU to access the full GPU frame buffer at once rather than in smaller chunks — a low-level optimization that can improve performance in certain titles without any user configuration. Neither card has LHR (lite hash rate) restrictions or RGB lighting, and XeSS is absent on both, which is expected given this is an NVIDIA product lineup where DLSS is the native upscaling solution.

There is no winner to declare here — the feature sets are completely identical. Any buyer prioritizing software capabilities, API support, or multi-monitor flexibility will find no reason to favor one over the other on this basis alone.

Ports:
has an HDMI output
HDMI ports 1 1
HDMI version HDMI 2.1b HDMI 2.1b
DisplayPort outputs 3 3
USB-C ports 0 0
DVI outputs 0 0
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0

Both cards offer the same output configuration: 3 DisplayPort and 1 HDMI 2.1b port, totaling four display outputs — which aligns with the four-display limit noted in their feature specs. The absence of USB-C, DVI, and mini DisplayPort is consistent with modern GPU design, where those legacy and niche connectors have largely been phased out at this product tier.

The inclusion of HDMI 2.1b is worth highlighting. This is the latest HDMI revision, supporting up to 4K at high refresh rates and 8K output, making it a forward-compatible choice for users connecting to a single high-end display or a modern TV. Meanwhile, three DisplayPort outputs give multi-monitor users plenty of flexibility — enough to drive a full triple-display setup while leaving the HDMI free for a fourth screen or an AV receiver.

This is another complete tie. The port layout is functionally identical on both cards, so connectivity requirements should not factor into any purchase decision between the Asus Dual OC and the Palit Infinity 3 OC.

General info:
GPU architecture Blackwell Blackwell
release date April 2025 April 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 180W 180W
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 5
semiconductor size 5 nm 5 nm
number of transistors 21900 million 21900 million
Has air-water cooling
width 229 mm 291.9 mm
height 120 mm 116.6 mm

Underneath the heatsink, these two cards are the same chip: both are built on NVIDIA's Blackwell architecture using a 5nm process with 21,900 million transistors, and both carry a 180W TDP. The shared power envelope means neither card demands more from a PSU or requires a different power connector setup, and both use conventional air cooling — no hybrid solutions in the mix.

Where this group does reveal a meaningful difference is physical size. The Asus Dual OC measures 229mm in length, while the Palit Infinity 3 OC stretches to 291.9mm — a gap of nearly 63mm. That is substantial. In smaller mid-tower or mini-ITX cases, the Asus's more compact footprint could be the deciding factor, fitting comfortably where the Palit simply may not. The Palit is marginally slimmer in height at 116.6mm versus the Asus's 120mm, but that 3.4mm difference is unlikely to matter in practice for most builds.

For case compatibility, the Asus Dual OC holds a clear advantage with its significantly shorter length. The Palit's extra length typically signals a larger cooler — which may benefit thermal performance — but that inference goes beyond what this group's data alone can confirm. Buyers working with constrained cases should measure carefully before choosing the Palit.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After a thorough review of the specifications, both cards prove to be closely matched siblings sharing the same Blackwell architecture, 16GB GDDR7 memory, 180W TDP, and a full feature set including ray tracing and DLSS. The distinction comes down to performance headroom and physical size. The Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB holds a consistent edge in every performance metric, offering a higher GPU turbo clock of 2662 MHz, 24.53 TFLOPS of floating-point performance, and a faster texture rate, making it the stronger choice for users who want every last frame. The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB, at just 229 mm wide, is the more compact option and will fit more easily into smaller PC cases without meaningful sacrifices in the overall feature set.

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB
Buy Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB if...

Buy the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB if you have a compact or small-form-factor case, as its significantly smaller 229 mm width makes it the easier card to fit without sacrificing core features.

Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB
Buy Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB if...

Buy the Palit GeForce RTX 5060 Ti Infinity 3 OC 16GB if you want the highest possible out-of-the-box performance, as it delivers a superior GPU turbo clock, floating-point throughput, pixel rate, and texture rate compared to its Asus counterpart.