Both cards share the same foundation: identical base clocks of 2280 MHz, the same 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and matching memory speeds of 1750 MHz. This means they draw from exactly the same GPU silicon and memory subsystem, and any performance gap between them is purely a product of factory overclocking decisions.
The key differentiator is boost clock headroom. The Prime OC Edition reaches a GPU turbo of 2565 MHz versus 2497 MHz on the Dual — a 68 MHz advantage. While modest in isolation, this cascades into measurably higher throughput across every compute metric: the Prime OC delivers 19.7 TFLOPS of floating-point performance against 19.18 TFLOPS, a 307.8 GTexels/s texture fill rate versus 299.6 GTexels/s, and a pixel rate of 123.1 GPixel/s compared to 119.9 GPixel/s. In real-world terms, higher TFLOPS translate to more headroom in compute-heavy workloads like ray tracing or AI-accelerated rendering, while the texture and pixel rate gaps point to slightly smoother throughput at high resolutions or in texture-dense scenes.
The Prime OC Edition holds a clear, if narrow, performance edge in this group. The gains are roughly 2–3% across the board — not transformative for everyday gaming, but consistent and measurable. Users who prioritize peak throughput and plan to push the card in demanding titles or creative workloads will find the Prime OC the stronger choice purely on these numbers.