Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060
Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Overview

Welcome to this in-depth specification comparison between the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition. Both cards are built on the same Blackwell architecture with identical memory configurations, yet they differ in key areas such as boost clock speeds, overall performance throughput, physical dimensions, and aesthetics. Read on to see how these two RTX 5060 variants stack up against each other.

Common Features

  • Both products have a GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz.
  • Both products have a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.
  • Both products have 3840 shading units.
  • Both products have 120 texture mapping units (TMUs).
  • Both products have 48 render output units (ROPs).
  • Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) is supported on both products.
  • Both products have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz.
  • Both products have a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • Both products feature 8GB of VRAM.
  • Both products use GDDR7 memory.
  • Both products have a 128-bit memory bus width.
  • ECC memory is supported on both products.
  • Both products support DirectX 12 Ultimate.
  • Both products have an OpenGL version of 4.6.
  • Both products have an OpenCL version of 3.
  • Multi-display technology is supported on both products.
  • Ray tracing is supported on both products.
  • 3D support is available on both products.
  • DLSS is supported on both products.
  • XeSS (XMX) is not available on either product.
  • Both products have one HDMI output running HDMI version 2.1b.
  • Both products have 3 DisplayPort outputs.
  • Neither product has USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.
  • Both products are built on the Blackwell GPU architecture.
  • Both products have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W.
  • Both products use PCIe version 5.
  • Both products are manufactured on a 5 nm semiconductor process.
  • Both products have 21900 million transistors.
  • Air-water cooling is not available on either product.

Main Differences

  • GPU turbo speed is 2497 MHz on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 2565 MHz on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
  • Pixel rate is 119.9 GPixel/s on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 123.1 GPixel/s on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
  • Floating-point performance is 19.18 TFLOPS on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 19.7 TFLOPS on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
  • Texture rate is 299.6 GTexels/s on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 307.8 GTexels/s on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
  • RGB lighting is present on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition but not available on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060.
  • Width is 228 mm on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 268.3 mm on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
  • Height is 123 mm on Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 and 120 mm on Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition.
Specs Comparison
Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060

Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Performance:
GPU clock speed 2280 MHz 2280 MHz
GPU turbo 2497 MHz 2565 MHz
pixel rate 119.9 GPixel/s 123.1 GPixel/s
floating-point performance 19.18 TFLOPS 19.7 TFLOPS
texture rate 299.6 GTexels/s 307.8 GTexels/s
GPU memory speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
shading units 3840 3840
texture mapping units (TMUs) 120 120
render output units (ROPs) 48 48
Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)

Both cards share the same foundation: identical base clocks of 2280 MHz, the same 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, and matching memory speeds of 1750 MHz. This means they draw from exactly the same GPU silicon and memory subsystem, and any performance gap between them is purely a product of factory overclocking decisions.

The key differentiator is boost clock headroom. The Prime OC Edition reaches a GPU turbo of 2565 MHz versus 2497 MHz on the Dual — a 68 MHz advantage. While modest in isolation, this cascades into measurably higher throughput across every compute metric: the Prime OC delivers 19.7 TFLOPS of floating-point performance against 19.18 TFLOPS, a 307.8 GTexels/s texture fill rate versus 299.6 GTexels/s, and a pixel rate of 123.1 GPixel/s compared to 119.9 GPixel/s. In real-world terms, higher TFLOPS translate to more headroom in compute-heavy workloads like ray tracing or AI-accelerated rendering, while the texture and pixel rate gaps point to slightly smoother throughput at high resolutions or in texture-dense scenes.

The Prime OC Edition holds a clear, if narrow, performance edge in this group. The gains are roughly 2–3% across the board — not transformative for everyday gaming, but consistent and measurable. Users who prioritize peak throughput and plan to push the card in demanding titles or creative workloads will find the Prime OC the stronger choice purely on these numbers.

Memory:
effective memory speed 28000 MHz 28000 MHz
maximum memory bandwidth 448 GB/s 448 GB/s
VRAM 8GB 8GB
GDDR version GDDR7 GDDR7
memory bus width 128-bit 128-bit
Supports ECC memory

On memory, these two cards are completely identical — and what they share is worth understanding. Both use GDDR7 at an effective speed of 28000 MHz, yielding a maximum bandwidth of 448 GB/s across a 128-bit bus. GDDR7 is the latest memory standard, and its efficiency gains over GDDR6X mean that the 128-bit interface here punches above its width — delivering bandwidth figures that would have required a 192-bit GDDR6 bus just a generation ago.

The 8 GB VRAM capacity is the one figure worth scrutinizing. At 1080p and 1440p, 8 GB is workable for most titles today, but it is increasingly a ceiling rather than a comfortable buffer in memory-hungry games and creative workloads. The high bandwidth helps mask latency when the buffer is under pressure, but it cannot add headroom that isn't there. ECC memory support is a practical inclusion for those using the card in professional or mixed workloads where data integrity matters.

This group is a straightforward tie. Every single memory specification — capacity, speed, bandwidth, bus width, generation, and ECC support — is shared between the Dual and the Prime OC Edition. Memory configuration will not be a deciding factor between these two cards.

Features:
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3
Supports multi-display technology
supports ray tracing
Supports 3D
supports DLSS
has XeSS (XMX)
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR
has LHR
has RGB lighting
supported displays 4 4

Functionally, these two cards are twins. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, ray tracing, and DLSS — the trio that defines a modern gaming feature set. Ray tracing enables real-time lighting and shadow simulation for greater visual fidelity, while DLSS uses AI-driven upscaling to recover frame rates lost to those demanding workloads. Support for up to 4 simultaneous displays and Intel Resizable BAR rounds out a capable, current-generation feature profile shared identically between both cards.

The only distinction in this group is aesthetic: the Prime OC Edition includes RGB lighting, while the Dual does not. For builders who invest in a themed or windowed system, this is a genuine differentiator — RGB lighting on a GPU is one of the most visible elements of a build. For those who prioritize function over appearance, it is simply irrelevant.

From a pure feature-capability standpoint, this group is essentially a tie. Every specification that affects actual rendering, compatibility, or display output is identical. The Prime OC Edition gains a marginal edge only if RGB lighting matters to the buyer — it adds no functional performance advantage.

Ports:
has an HDMI output
HDMI ports 1 1
HDMI version HDMI 2.1b HDMI 2.1b
DisplayPort outputs 3 3
USB-C ports 0 0
DVI outputs 0 0
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0

Port selection is identical across both cards: one HDMI 2.1b output and three DisplayPort outputs, for a total of four physical connections — matching the four-display limit noted in the Features group. HDMI 2.1b is the current standard, capable of handling 4K at high refresh rates and 8K output, making either card a solid fit for modern monitors and TVs alike. The three DisplayPort outputs give multi-monitor users plenty of flexibility without adapters.

Neither card offers USB-C, mini DisplayPort, or DVI — absences that are entirely expected at this tier and generation, where those interfaces have largely been retired in favor of the current HDMI and DisplayPort standards. There is nothing to distinguish the two here, and no connectivity trade-off to consider when choosing between them.

This group is a complete tie. The port layout, versions, and counts are a perfect match between the Dual and the Prime OC Edition. Display connectivity should play no part in the decision between these two cards.

General info:
GPU architecture Blackwell Blackwell
release date May 2025 May 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 145W 145W
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 5
semiconductor size 5 nm 5 nm
number of transistors 21900 million 21900 million
Has air-water cooling
width 228 mm 268.3 mm
height 123 mm 120 mm

At the architectural level, both cards are built on the same Blackwell GPU using a 5 nm process with 21.9 billion transistors, and both carry an identical 145W TDP. That shared power envelope is significant: it means the Prime OC Edition extracts its higher boost clocks from the same thermal and power budget as the Dual — a more efficient tuning rather than a brute-force power increase. PCIe 5.0 support on both ensures neither card will face interface bandwidth constraints on current or near-future platforms.

The one area of divergence is physical dimensions. The Dual measures 228 mm in length, while the Prime OC Edition is noticeably longer at 268.3 mm. That 40 mm difference is meaningful for smaller cases — compact ATX and mATX builds in particular may have clearance constraints that rule out the Prime OC Edition entirely. Height is nearly identical between the two, so slot width is not a differentiating concern.

For case fit, the Dual holds a practical advantage by virtue of its shorter footprint, making it the more versatile choice for space-constrained builds. In systems where GPU length is not a limitation, these two cards are otherwise equal on every general specification that matters — same architecture, same process node, same power draw.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After a thorough comparison, both cards share a strong foundation: the same Blackwell GPU architecture, 8GB of GDDR7 memory, a 145W TDP, and an identical port layout. The distinction lies in the details. The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition pulls ahead with a higher GPU turbo of 2565 MHz, superior floating-point performance at 19.7 TFLOPS, and the added flair of RGB lighting, making it the better pick for enthusiasts who want every last drop of performance and a more visually striking build. The Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060, on the other hand, offers a more compact footprint at just 228 mm wide, making it ideal for users with tighter cases or those who simply do not need the OC headroom. Neither card is a poor choice; your decision ultimately comes down to whether you value higher clock speeds and aesthetics or a smaller, more case-friendly form factor.

Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060
Buy Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 if...

Buy the Asus Dual GeForce RTX 5060 if you have a compact or smaller PC case, as its 228 mm width gives it a clear size advantage over its sibling.

Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition
Buy Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition if...

Buy the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition if you want higher boost clocks, better floating-point performance, and RGB lighting for a more powerful and visually expressive build.