Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC differ significantly in terms of clock speeds and performance metrics. The Asus card has a GPU clock speed of 2317 MHz, with a turbo boost up to 2707 MHz, while the MSI card runs at a slightly lower base clock of 2280 MHz, with a turbo boost reaching 2527 MHz. This gives the Asus card a marginal advantage in clock speed, though the MSI card compensates with superior pixel rate and floating-point performance. The MSI card achieves a pixel rate of 121.3 GPixel/s, compared to the Asus card's 86.62 GPixel/s, reflecting a substantial difference in how much visual data both GPUs can handle per second. Additionally, the MSI card offers a higher floating-point performance at 19.41 TFLOPS, surpassing the Asus card's 13.86 TFLOPS.

When it comes to texture and shading capabilities, the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC outshines the Asus Prime with a texture rate of 303.2 GTexels/s, significantly higher than the Asus card's 216.6 GTexels/s. The MSI card also boasts a greater number of shading units (3840 versus 2560 for the Asus) and texture mapping units (TMUs), with 120 in the MSI card compared to the Asus card's 80 TMUs. These differences suggest that the MSI card has a higher processing capacity for complex textures and shading in demanding graphics tasks.

Both products share the same GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz and include 32 render output units (ROPs) for the Asus card and 48 ROPs for the MSI card, with the latter offering slightly more output units. Finally, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), ensuring compatibility for high-precision calculations in professional applications. Overall, while the Asus card has a slight edge in base clock speed, the MSI card generally offers superior performance metrics in pixel rate, floating-point processing, and texture capabilities.

The memory specifications for the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC show some clear differences, especially in memory speed and bandwidth. The Asus card features an effective memory speed of 20000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 320 GB/s. In contrast, the MSI card offers a higher effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, with a maximum bandwidth of 448 GB/s. This difference in memory speed and bandwidth suggests that the MSI card can handle more data per second, which could be particularly beneficial in memory-intensive tasks like gaming or rendering.

Both cards come with 8GB of VRAM, and the memory bus width is the same at 128-bit for both models. Both products also support Error-Correcting Code (ECC) memory, which helps ensure stability in professional applications by automatically correcting minor memory errors.

In terms of GDDR type, the Asus Prime uses GDDR6 memory, while the MSI card features the newer GDDR7 memory, which may offer enhanced performance due to improvements in the GDDR7 architecture, such as higher data rates and better energy efficiency. However, both cards have the same VRAM size, memory bus width, and ECC memory support.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC share many similarities in terms of features. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with modern games and applications. They also both support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, as well as DLSS for improved gaming performance in supported titles. Additionally, both cards are compatible with Intel Resizable BAR, a feature that can enhance performance in certain workloads by enabling direct access to the GPU memory.

However, there are a few notable differences. The Asus Prime card features RGB lighting, which is not available on the MSI card. Both products do not support XeSS (XMX) technology, so there's no difference in this regard. Another shared characteristic is that neither card has LHR (Lite Hash Rate), meaning both are suitable for cryptocurrency mining tasks that may require higher hash rates.

In terms of supported displays, both cards can support up to 4 displays, providing flexibility for multi-monitor setups. Overall, these two products are quite similar in features, with the primary difference being the inclusion of RGB lighting on the Asus card.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC offer identical port configurations. Both cards have an HDMI output with 1 HDMI port, supporting HDMI 2.1b. Each also includes 3 DisplayPort outputs, providing flexibility for multi-display setups. Neither card features USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

These ports ensure that both cards can handle modern display technologies, such as 4K and high refresh rate displays, with HDMI 2.1b offering the latest HDMI features. With 3 DisplayPort outputs on each, users can easily connect multiple monitors for extended desktop or gaming setups.

Overall, the port configurations on the Asus and MSI cards are exactly the same, offering similar display connectivity options without additional features like USB-C or mini DisplayPort.

Both the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5050 OC Edition and the MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Shadow 2X OC are built on the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and both use a 5 nm semiconductor size. However, there are notable differences in their thermal design power (TDP) and size. The Asus card has a TDP of 130W, while the MSI card has a slightly higher TDP of 145W, indicating it may consume more power under load. In terms of physical size, the Asus card is larger, with a width of 268.3 mm, compared to the MSI card’s width of 197 mm. Both cards share the same height of 120 mm.

In terms of transistors, the MSI card has a higher count, with 21,900 million transistors, while the Asus card has 16,900 million transistors. This difference in transistor count may contribute to a difference in processing power and efficiency. Both cards support PCIe version 5, ensuring high-speed data transfer with modern motherboards.

Neither card offers air-water cooling, so both rely on traditional air cooling solutions. These specifications show that while the cards are quite similar in architecture and cooling, the MSI card is slightly more power-hungry and more compact in size, with a higher transistor count.