Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition VS Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile both feature a GPU clock speed of 2280 MHz, so in terms of base performance, they are identical. However, their turbo clock speeds differ slightly, with the Asus model reaching up to 2565 MHz, while the Gigabyte model peaks at 2512 MHz.

In terms of pixel rate, the Asus card has a higher value of 123.1 GPixel/s compared to the Gigabyte card's 120.6 GPixel/s. Similarly, the texture rate is also higher on the Asus card, offering 307.8 GTexels/s compared to the Gigabyte's 301.4 GTexels/s. These differences suggest the Asus card could handle more demanding visual processing tasks with slightly higher efficiency.

Both models feature a floating-point performance of around 19.7 TFLOPS for the Asus and 19.29 TFLOPS for the Gigabyte, showing a minor difference in raw computational power. The shading units, texture mapping units (TMUs), render output units (ROPs), GPU memory speed, and Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) support are identical across both products, with each offering 3840 shading units, 120 TMUs, 48 ROPs, a memory speed of 1750 MHz, and DPFP support.

When comparing the memory specifications of the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile, both cards are nearly identical. Each card has an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, and both offer a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. They also come with 8GB of VRAM, ensuring similar memory capacity for both products.

Both cards utilize GDDR7 memory and feature a memory bus width of 128-bit. Additionally, both support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, which helps maintain data integrity during high-performance computing tasks. In terms of these memory specifications, there is no noticeable difference between the two models.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile both share several key features, including support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3. Both also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS, ensuring they can handle modern gaming and graphical tasks with ease. Additionally, both cards support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not supported) and have no LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations.

One noticeable difference is in RGB lighting: the Asus model includes RGB lighting, while the Gigabyte model does not. Both cards support up to four displays, so there’s no difference in terms of display connectivity.

For XeSS (XMX) support, both models lack this feature, meaning neither card offers Intel's AI-driven supersampling technology. Overall, the feature set of both cards is quite similar, with the primary distinction being the RGB lighting found only on the Asus model.

Both the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and the Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile offer similar port configurations. Each card includes 1 HDMI port with HDMI 2.1b support, making them compatible with the latest HDMI standards. They also both feature 3 DisplayPort outputs, ensuring plenty of options for connecting to multiple displays.

Neither card includes USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs, so there are no differences in that regard. Overall, the port configurations of both cards are identical, offering the same HDMI and DisplayPort options without any additional connectivity features.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and Gigabyte GeForce RTX 5060 OC Low Profile share several key specifications, starting with the GPU architecture. Both models use the Blackwell architecture, ensuring similar core performance. They also have identical thermal design power (TDP) of 145W, meaning both cards are expected to consume the same amount of power under load.

In terms of physical dimensions, the cards differ significantly. The Asus model is 268.3 mm in width and 120 mm in height, while the Gigabyte model is more compact, with a width of 182 mm and height of 69 mm. This size difference may be relevant for users with space constraints in their PC cases.

Both products use a 5 nm semiconductor size and feature 21.9 billion transistors, indicating they are built with the same advanced manufacturing process for performance and efficiency. Neither card includes air-water cooling systems, and both support PCIe version 5 for high-speed data transfer.