Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition VS MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC have identical GPU clock speeds, both running at 2280 MHz. However, their GPU turbo speeds differ slightly, with the Asus card reaching 2565 MHz, while the MSI card tops out at 2535 MHz. This gives the Asus model a slight edge in turbo performance.

In terms of pixel rate, the Asus card leads with 123.1 GPixel/s, while the MSI card offers 121.7 GPixel/s. The difference here is relatively small but may have an impact on pixel rendering in specific scenarios.

When it comes to floating-point performance, the Asus card again takes the lead, providing 19.7 TFLOPS compared to the MSI's 19.47 TFLOPS. Both cards have the same texture rate of 307.8 GTexels/s for the Asus model and 304.2 GTexels/s for the MSI, which is a marginal difference. The GPU memory speed is also identical at 1750 MHz, and both products share the same number of shading units (3840), texture mapping units (120), and render output units (48). Lastly, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP) capabilities.

Both the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC feature identical memory specifications. Both cards are equipped with 8GB of VRAM, have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, and support the GDDR7 memory type. Additionally, both models offer the same maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s and share a 128-bit memory bus width.

Another common feature is support for ECC (Error Correcting Code) memory, which both cards include. This ensures that the memory errors are automatically corrected, providing more stability and reliability for critical applications.

With all memory-related specifications identical, there is no significant difference between these two cards in terms of memory performance or features.

Both the Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC are equipped with DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3 support, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming and development technologies. Additionally, both cards support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D rendering, and feature DLSS support for improved performance in supported games.

There are no differences between the two cards in terms of AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR support, as both support Intel Resizable BAR. Both models also lack XeSS (XMX) support, which may affect certain specific AI-enhanced workloads.

The main distinction comes in the RGB lighting feature, where the Asus card includes RGB lighting, while the MSI card does not. Both models support up to 4 displays, and neither has LHR (Lite Hash Rate) restrictions, ensuring that both are suitable for a variety of uses without limitations related to cryptocurrency mining.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC are very similar in terms of ports. Both cards have an HDMI output, with 1 HDMI port each, and both support HDMI 2.1b. Additionally, both models feature 3 DisplayPort outputs, with no USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs available.

Given the identical specifications for all available ports, there is no distinction between the two cards in terms of connectivity options.

Both cards offer the same set of display outputs, making them equally capable of supporting multiple monitors and high-definition content.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition and MSI GeForce RTX 5060 Ventus 3X OC share the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and both have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 145W. They also use the same PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 and feature a 5 nm semiconductor size. Additionally, both cards have the same number of transistors, 21,900 million, and neither includes air-water cooling.

In terms of physical dimensions, there is a slight difference. The Asus card has a width of 268.3 mm and a height of 120 mm, while the MSI card is slightly larger, with a width of 303 mm and a height of 121 mm. These differences in size may affect case compatibility, depending on available space.

Aside from the size differences, the two products are nearly identical in terms of general specifications, with no other significant distinctions.