Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 VS MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Shadow 3X

When comparing the performance specifications of the Asus Prime RTX 5070 and the MSI RTX 5070 Shadow 3X, the data tells a remarkably straightforward story: these two cards are built on an identical performance foundation. Both share a base GPU clock of 2325 MHz and a turbo boost of 2512 MHz, meaning neither card has a factory clock speed advantage out of the box.

Every derived performance metric flows from that parity. The 30.87 TFLOPS of floating-point throughput, 482.3 GTexels/s texture rate, and 201 GPixel/s pixel rate are identical across both cards. At the hardware unit level, both feature 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs — the full, uncut RTX 5070 silicon with no disabled compute blocks. Memory subsystem performance is also locked in step, with both running at 1750 MHz memory speed. Double Precision Floating Point support is present on both, which is relevant for compute workloads but rarely a differentiator in gaming scenarios.

For this performance group, the verdict is a complete tie. Every measurable throughput and clock metric is identical. Any real-world performance difference between these two cards would have to come from thermal headroom, board power delivery, or cooling efficiency — factors that fall outside this group's data. Buyers should look to other specification groups, such as cooling design or price, to distinguish between them.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 and MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Shadow 3X share identical memory specifications. Both models feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s. They are equipped with 12GB of VRAM, utilize GDDR7 memory, and have a 192-bit memory bus width. Additionally, both products support Error-Correcting Code (ECC) memory, ensuring greater data reliability during high-demand tasks.

Since the memory specs are identical for both products, there is no difference in their memory performance or capabilities as per the provided data.

In summary, the Asus and MSI models are equally matched in this specification group, offering the same memory features and performance characteristics.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 and MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Shadow 3X are equipped with the same set of features. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL version 4.6, and OpenCL version 3, ensuring compatibility with modern gaming and computing applications. Additionally, both products support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, and are capable of utilizing DLSS for improved performance in supported games.

Both models also lack XeSS (XMX) support and have no LHR (Lite Hash Rate), meaning they are not limited in mining performance. Furthermore, both products are compatible with Intel Resizable BAR technology, which can improve CPU-to-GPU communication for better performance in certain applications.

In terms of display capabilities, both the Asus and MSI cards support up to 4 displays. Additionally, neither product features RGB lighting, maintaining a more neutral design aesthetic.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 and MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Shadow 3X both offer very similar port configurations. Both models are equipped with a single HDMI 2.1b output and three DisplayPort outputs, providing plenty of connectivity options for multiple displays. Neither card has USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs, which keeps the port offerings streamlined and focused on HDMI and DisplayPort connectivity.

With the same HDMI version (HDMI 2.1b) and the same number of ports across both models, there is no difference in terms of display output capabilities between the Asus and MSI versions.

Overall, both the Asus and MSI cards provide the same port setup, ensuring equal compatibility for users looking to connect multiple monitors or high-definition displays.

The Asus Prime GeForce RTX 5070 and MSI GeForce RTX 5070 Shadow 3X are built on the same GPU architecture, Blackwell, and both feature a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 250W, ensuring similar power consumption requirements. They also share the same PCI Express (PCIe) version, 5.0, as well as a 5 nm semiconductor size and 31,100 million transistors, indicating equivalent manufacturing processes and transistor counts.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Asus model is slightly larger, measuring 306 mm in width and 126 mm in height, while the MSI version is more compact at 303 mm in width and 121 mm in height. Both cards lack air-water cooling systems, providing standard cooling configurations.

Overall, the two models are nearly identical in terms of general specifications, with the only difference being the slight size variation between the two products.