Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV 32" VS Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM 32"

The Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM are both 31.5″ displays with notable differences in display technology. The PA32QCV uses an IPS LCD LED-backlit panel, while the PA32UCDM features a QD-OLED panel, known for deeper blacks and better contrast. In terms of response time, the PA32UCDM offers a significantly faster 0.1 ms response time compared to the PA32QCV's 5 ms.

Both displays have a resolution of 6016 x 3384 px for the PA32QCV and 3840 x 2160 px for the PA32UCDM. While the PA32QCV has a higher resolution, the PA32UCDM offers a lower pixel density of 140 ppi versus 218 ppi in the PA32QCV. Both monitors support VESA Adaptive Sync and have a matte panel with anti-glare coatings, but the PA32UCDM boasts a higher refresh rate of 240Hz compared to the PA32QCV's 60Hz.

Both monitors provide excellent viewing angles, with a 178º horizontal and vertical viewing angle on each. Neither monitor has a glossy panel or a touch screen, making them both suitable for precise work without reflections or fingerprints.

Both the Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM are designed for photo and video editing. However, there are a few key differences in their physical characteristics and features. The PA32QCV is slightly taller at 419.7 mm compared to the PA32UCDM's 422 mm, but it is wider at 714.2 mm, while the PA32UCDM measures 717 mm in width. The PA32QCV is also thicker at 46.9 mm, whereas the PA32UCDM is 42 mm thick. In terms of weight, the PA32QCV is heavier at 9300 g, while the PA32UCDM weighs 9000 g.

Both monitors support tilt adjustment, but the PA32QCV has the added flexibility of a swivel stand, which the PA32UCDM lacks. Additionally, the PA32QCV supports portrait mode, while the PA32UCDM does not. Both monitors are compatible with VESA mounts for wall mounting or stand replacement.

When it comes to energy efficiency, the PA32QCV has an EU energy label of G, which indicates a lower energy efficiency compared to the PA32UCDM, which has an EU energy label of F. In terms of physical volume, the PA32QCV is larger with a volume of 14058.26 cm³, while the PA32UCDM has a volume of 12708.11 cm³.

Both the Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM support color calibration, ensuring accurate color representation for photo and video editing. However, the two displays differ in several key color-related specifications. The PA32QCV offers a typical brightness of 400 nits, whereas the PA32UCDM has a lower typical brightness of 250 nits.

In terms of display colors, both monitors are capable of displaying 1073 million colors and feature a 10-bit bit depth, ensuring smooth gradation and rich color accuracy. Both also cover 100% of the sRGB color gamut, making them suitable for color-critical work.

When it comes to contrast ratio, the PA32UCDM stands out with an impressive 1500000:1 ratio, which is significantly higher than the PA32QCV's 1500:1, offering deeper blacks and more vivid contrast on the OLED panel.

Both the Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM come equipped with one HDMI port and support Thunderbolt, but they differ in other connectivity features. The PA32QCV offers more USB ports, with a total of 9, compared to the PA32UCDM's 5. Additionally, the PA32QCV includes a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the PA32UCDM does not.

When it comes to video output, the PA32QCV has one DisplayPort output, whereas the PA32UCDM lacks a DisplayPort output but still supports HDMI 2.1 on both models. Neither product has a DVI or VGA connector, nor do they include a mini DisplayPort output. The PA32QCV also lacks support for AirPlay, while the PA32UCDM includes AirPlay support, allowing for wireless content sharing.

Neither monitor supports Ethernet or Wi-Fi connectivity, so both rely on wired connections for video and data transfer.

In terms of power consumption, the Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM show some differences. The PA32QCV consumes 49.49W of power during operation, while the PA32UCDM is more power-efficient, using only 32W. Both models have the same standby power consumption of 0.5W, ensuring minimal energy use when not in active operation.

While both displays are fairly energy-efficient in standby mode, the PA32UCDM is the more power-efficient choice during active use, consuming significantly less energy than the PA32QCV.

Both the Asus ProArt Display 6K PA32QCV and the Asus ProArt Display OLED PA32UCDM offer similar features for an enhanced viewing experience. Both models support Picture-in-Picture (PiP), include stereo speakers, and have an ambient light sensor. Neither display includes built-in smart TV functionality or a front camera.

In terms of audio output, the PA32UCDM has slightly more powerful speakers, with 2 x 3W output compared to the PA32QCV's 2 x 2W. However, neither product supports Dolby Digital, Dolby Digital Plus, or DTS Surround, meaning their audio capabilities are fairly basic despite the inclusion of stereo speakers.

Both models lack a remote control, keeping their user interaction limited to physical buttons or other connected devices for controlling the display.