Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti VS Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3

The Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3 both feature impressive GPU performance, but with key differences in their specifications. The Asus RTX 5070 Ti has a GPU clock speed of 2295 MHz and a turbo speed of 2452 MHz, while the Palit RTX 4070 Ti has a slightly higher GPU clock speed of 2340 MHz, with a turbo speed of 2610 MHz. This gives the Palit model a marginal advantage in turbo performance.

Looking at pixel rate, the Palit RTX 4070 Ti delivers 250.6 GPixel/s, outperforming the Asus model, which offers 235.4 GPixel/s. Both cards have similar floating-point performance, with the Asus at 43.94 TFLOPS and the Palit at 44.1 TFLOPS, showing very close numbers in raw processing power.

For texture rate, the Palit card again leads slightly with 689 GTexels/s, compared to the 686.6 GTexels/s of the Asus model. The Asus RTX 5070 Ti has a faster GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, compared to the Palit's 1313 MHz, which could offer a performance boost in memory-intensive tasks for the Asus. Both cards share identical numbers for shading units (8960 for Asus and 8448 for Palit) and render output units (96 for both), and both support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), providing reliable precision in computations.

The Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3 share similar memory capacities, both offering 16GB of VRAM. However, they differ in several key memory specifications. The Asus RTX 5070 Ti features a significantly higher effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, compared to the Palit's 21000 MHz. This difference may result in faster memory operations on the Asus card, especially in tasks that rely on memory bandwidth.

Regarding maximum memory bandwidth, the Asus model outperforms the Palit card with a bandwidth of 896 GB/s, while the Palit provides 672 GB/s. Both cards have a 256-bit memory bus width, meaning their data paths are the same width, but the Asus card can transfer data faster due to its higher memory speed and bandwidth.

Both products support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring greater reliability in computing processes. In terms of GDDR memory versions, the Asus uses GDDR7, while the Palit uses the slightly older GDDR6X. The difference in GDDR versions may affect memory efficiency and future-proofing, with GDDR7 potentially offering higher performance and efficiency over time.

The Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3 share several similar features, with both supporting DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3, ensuring compatibility with the latest gaming and productivity software. Both also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D, providing a comprehensive feature set for immersive visual experiences. Additionally, both cards support DLSS, enhancing performance in supported games and applications.

One notable difference is in RGB lighting, where the Asus model features RGB lighting, while the Palit model does not. Both cards lack support for XeSS (XMX), so users won't benefit from Intel's AI-based upscaling technology. Furthermore, both products support Intel Resizable BAR, which can improve overall performance in certain games by enabling the CPU to access the full memory of the GPU.

When it comes to supported displays, both cards support up to 4 displays, allowing users to set up multi-monitor configurations for increased productivity or gaming immersion. Both models also lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate), meaning they are fully capable of cryptocurrency mining without the reduced mining performance typically seen in LHR variants.

The Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3 offer similar HDMI output configurations, with both featuring 1 HDMI port. The key difference is that the Asus card supports HDMI 2.1b, while the Palit card supports HDMI 2.1a. These versions differ slightly in terms of their feature sets, but both support high-resolution and high-refresh-rate displays.

In terms of DisplayPort outputs, the Asus model offers 2 ports, while the Palit card provides 3, giving the Palit model a slight edge in terms of flexibility for multi-monitor setups using DisplayPort. The Asus card also includes 1 USB-C port, a feature not available on the Palit card, which might be useful for users with devices that require USB-C connectivity for display output.

Both cards lack DVI and mini DisplayPort outputs, so users relying on these types of connections will need to use adapters or alternate ports. Overall, the Asus card offers a more balanced port selection with its USB-C port, while the Palit card provides an additional DisplayPort for users needing more display outputs.

The Asus ProArt GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and the Palit GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super Infinity 3 differ in several key aspects of their general specifications. The Asus model is built on the Blackwell GPU architecture, while the Palit card uses the Ada Lovelace architecture. Both use a 5 nm semiconductor size, but the Palit card has a significantly higher number of transistors at 76,300 million, compared to the 45,600 million in the Asus card.

Regarding power consumption, the Asus RTX 5070 Ti has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 300W, while the Palit card is slightly more power-efficient with a TDP of 285W. This means the Asus card may draw more power under load. Additionally, the Asus card uses PCIe version 5, offering potentially faster data transfer speeds, while the Palit card is based on PCIe version 4, which may slightly limit the bandwidth in comparison.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Asus card is 304 mm in width and 126 mm in height, making it larger than the Palit card, which measures 294 mm in width and 116 mm in height. Both cards lack air-water cooling systems. The size difference may be an important consideration for users with space constraints in their systems.