Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi VS Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F and B860-G Gaming WiFi share the same fundamental platform: both use the LGA 1851 socket with a B860 chipset, support identical wireless connectivity up to Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be) with Bluetooth 5.4, and offer the same feature set including dual BIOS, RGB lighting, HDMI 2.1, and a 3-year warranty. For most users, these shared specs mean both boards are equally capable in terms of connectivity, future-proofing, and everyday usability.

The single defining difference between the two is form factor. The B860-F is a full-size ATX board measuring 305 × 244 mm, while the B860-G is a Micro-ATX board at 244 × 244 mm — roughly 20% smaller in footprint. In practice, this means the B860-G is designed for more compact mid-tower or small-form-factor cases, whereas the B860-F requires a standard ATX enclosure. The smaller Micro-ATX size typically comes with fewer expansion slots and potentially less room for additional PCIe cards, though that distinction falls outside the specs provided here.

For this group, the choice comes down entirely to your case and build goals. If you are building a compact system, the B860-G has a clear practical advantage due to its smaller footprint. If you want maximum expandability and are building in a full-size tower, the B860-F is the natural fit. Neither board holds a technological edge over the other in general features — the two are effectively identical except for size.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi are identical in terms of their memory specifications. Both motherboards support a maximum memory amount of 256GB and have 4 memory slots for RAM. They also feature the same DDR5 memory version and dual memory channels (2). Additionally, both motherboards support overclocked RAM speeds of up to 9066 MHz and do not support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory.

With no differences in memory-related specs, the performance potential for memory is the same on both boards, whether you're installing high-speed RAM or looking to upgrade to 256GB of capacity.

Overall, there is no distinction in terms of memory configuration between these two products, making them equal in this aspect.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi have several similarities and differences in their port configurations. Both motherboards include 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2 port (USB-A), 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 port, 1 USB 4 40Gbps port, 1 Thunderbolt 4 port, 1 HDMI output, 1 DisplayPort output, and 1 RJ45 Ethernet port. Additionally, both feature USB Type-C support, but neither offers USB 3.2 Gen 2 or Gen 1 ports in USB-C format, nor do they have eSATA, DVI, or VGA connectors.

Where the two differ is in the number of USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) and USB 2.0 ports. The B860-F offers 6 USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-A) and has no USB 2.0 ports, while the B860-G has only 3 USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-A) but includes 4 USB 2.0 ports.

Both motherboards lack PS/2 ports and Thunderbolt 3 ports, but they offer the same general connectivity options in terms of HDMI, DisplayPort, and Ethernet. Overall, the key distinction is in the USB port distribution, with the B860-F providing more USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports, while the B860-G compensates with additional USB 2.0 ports.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi share many similar connectors, but there are a couple of differences worth noting. Both motherboards provide 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (through expansion), 3 USB 2.0 ports (through expansion), and 4 SATA 3 connectors. They also both have 2 USB 3.0 ports (through expansion) and 4 M.2 sockets.

The primary difference between the two is in the number of fan headers. The B860-F offers 6 fan headers, while the B860-G has 4 fan headers. Both motherboards lack a TPM connector, mSATA connector, and U.2 sockets, and neither provides SATA 2 connectors.

Overall, the two motherboards have very similar connector configurations, with the B860-F having the advantage of more fan headers for increased cooling options.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi have a similar approach to expansion slots, but with one key difference. The B860-F includes both a PCIe 4.0 x16 slot and a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot, while the B860-G only provides a PCIe 5.0 x16 slot and lacks the PCIe 4.0 x16 slot. Both motherboards do not feature any PCIe x1, PCIe x4, PCIe x8, or PCIe 2.0 x16 slots, nor do they have PCI slots.

In essence, the B860-F has an additional PCIe 4.0 x16 slot, while the B860-G offers just the PCIe 5.0 x16 slot for high-speed expansion cards.

Despite the differences in the number of PCIe slots, both motherboards offer strong expansion potential with the inclusion of PCIe 5.0, ensuring future compatibility with high-performance GPUs and other expansion cards.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi have identical audio specifications. Both motherboards offer a 120 dB signal-to-noise ratio (DAC), which ensures high-quality audio output. They also feature 7.1 audio channels for a full surround sound experience, and both have an S/PDIF Out port for digital audio transmission.

In terms of audio connectors, both motherboards include 2 audio connectors, providing flexibility for various audio setups.

Overall, the audio capabilities are the same on both boards, ensuring an excellent audio experience regardless of which model you choose.

The Asus ROG Strix B860-F Gaming WiFi and the Asus ROG Strix B860-G Gaming WiFi have identical storage capabilities. Both motherboards support RAID 1, RAID 10 (1+0), RAID 5, and RAID 0 configurations, allowing users to set up various storage arrays for performance or redundancy. Neither motherboard supports RAID 0+1, which is the only difference in storage configurations between the two models.

With matching RAID support, both boards are equipped for high-performance storage setups, making them equal in this category.

Overall, there is no significant difference between the two products when it comes to storage options, as both support a robust set of RAID configurations.