Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 16" (Ryzen 9 9955HX / RTX 5060 Laptop / 32GB RAM / 2TB) VS Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra 16"

Both the Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra are gaming laptops with similar design features, though there are some differences in their dimensions and weight. The Asus ROG Strix G16 weighs 2500 g, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra is slightly heavier at 2580 g. In terms of size, the Asus model measures 354 mm in width, 264 mm in height, and 22 mm in thickness, whereas the Thunderobot model is slightly larger at 358 mm wide, 268 mm tall, and 26 mm thick.

Both laptops are not fanless, meaning they rely on traditional cooling systems. They also feature backlit keyboards for better visibility in low light environments. The volume of the Asus ROG Strix G16 is 2056.032 cm³, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has a larger volume of 2494.544 cm³, reflecting its bigger size.

Neither laptop is weather-sealed (splashproof) or has a rugged build, so they are not designed for heavy-duty outdoor use or exposure to harsh conditions. Overall, the primary differences come down to size and weight, with the Thunderobot being slightly larger and heavier, while both share similar features like the backlit keyboard and non-fanless design.

Both the Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra feature 16″ screens with a resolution of 2560 x 1600 px and a pixel density of 188 ppi, providing similarly sharp and clear displays. Both laptops use LCD, LED-backlit, IPS panels, ensuring vibrant colors and wide viewing angles. Neither of the laptops has a touchscreen, as indicated by the absence of a touch screen feature in both models.

In terms of brightness, the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra offers a higher typical brightness of 600 nits, compared to the Asus ROG Strix G16's 500 nits. This means the Thunderobot model could provide slightly better visibility in bright environments. The Asus model, however, has an anti-reflection coating, which the Thunderobot model lacks. This feature helps reduce glare, especially in well-lit surroundings, giving the ROG Strix G16 an edge in handling reflections.

When it comes to refresh rate, the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra supports a faster 360Hz refresh rate, while the Asus ROG Strix G16 offers a 240Hz refresh rate. Both laptops support up to 4 external displays, providing flexibility for multitasking and extended screen setups. The difference in refresh rate might be noticeable in fast-paced gaming or intensive graphical tasks, with the Thunderobot having a slight advantage in that area.

The Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra both offer high-performance specifications, though there are notable differences in their hardware setups. Both laptops are equipped with 32GB of RAM and utilize flash storage in the form of NVMe SSDs. The Asus model has 2048GB of internal storage, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has half that amount at 1024GB.

In terms of processing power, the Asus ROG Strix G16 has a Ryzen 9 9955HX CPU with 16 cores running at a base speed of 2.5 GHz, and it supports up to 32 threads. In comparison, the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra is equipped with a CPU that has 8 cores at 2.4 GHz and 12 cores at 1.8 GHz, supporting a total of 20 threads. Despite the Asus having more cores and threads, the Thunderobot’s CPU may still perform well due to its higher clock speeds.

When it comes to graphics, the Asus ROG Strix G16 features 8GB of VRAM, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has a larger 16GB of VRAM, potentially offering better performance in GPU-intensive tasks. The Asus model delivers floating-point performance of 9.684 TFLOPS, compared to the Thunderobot’s higher 23.04 TFLOPS. Additionally, the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has a higher texture rate (384 GTexels/s) and pixel rate (144 GPixel/s), significantly outperforming the Asus ROG Strix G16, which has a texture rate of 151.3 GTexels/s and pixel rate of 46.56 GPixel/s. The Thunderobot also supports PCIe version 5, whereas the Asus supports PCIe version 4. Both laptops feature GDDR7 VRAM and use multithreading, with similar turbo clock speeds—5.4GHz for the Asus and 5.2GHz for the Thunderobot. The semiconductor size is smaller in the Thunderobot (4 nm) compared to the Asus (5 nm), potentially reflecting a more advanced manufacturing process for the Thunderobot's components.

In terms of overall performance, the Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 achieves a PassMark result of 57540, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra scores slightly lower with 50739. This indicates that the Asus model has a higher overall performance in multi-threaded tasks. However, when looking at the single-thread performance, the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra comes out ahead with a score of 4645, compared to the Asus ROG Strix G16’s 4452. This suggests that the Thunderobot may perform slightly better in tasks that rely on single-threaded performance, like some older applications or specific types of workloads.

Both laptops show strong performance, but the Asus ROG Strix G16 edges ahead in the multi-threaded PassMark result, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra shines in single-thread performance. These benchmarks give a glimpse into how each laptop might perform under different types of usage, depending on whether you're focused on multi-core or single-core tasks.

Ultimately, the performance difference is relatively close, but the specifics of what you use the laptop for could influence which one might be a better fit based on these benchmark results.

The Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra both offer strong connectivity options, but there are a few differences worth noting. Both laptops include two USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-A ports, but the Asus model has two USB 4 40Gbps ports, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra only has one. Neither laptop features USB 3.2 Gen 1 or USB 4 20Gbps ports, and neither has Thunderbolt 3 ports.

Both models are equipped with an HDMI 2.1 port and support Wi-Fi 6 and 5, but the Asus laptop adds support for Wi-Fi 6E, providing an additional wireless band for faster and more stable connections. Both laptops also support Bluetooth 5.3 and have one RJ45 port for wired networking. Neither has an external memory slot, mini DisplayPort outputs, or a VGA connector.

Both devices include AirPlay support, allowing for wireless streaming to compatible devices, and each has one HDMI port for video output. Overall, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has slightly fewer USB 4 40Gbps ports compared to the Asus ROG Strix G16, both laptops offer similar overall connectivity options, including advanced Wi-Fi and Bluetooth capabilities.

The Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra both include sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing for charging devices even when the laptop is in sleep mode. However, there is a difference in battery size between the two models. The Asus ROG Strix G16 has a larger 90 Wh battery, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra comes with an 80 Wh battery.

Both laptops do not feature a MagSafe power adapter, which means they rely on standard charging methods rather than magnetic connectors for power. Despite the difference in battery size, both models offer similar power management features, including sleep-and-charge USB ports for added convenience.

Overall, the Asus ROG Strix G16 has a slightly larger battery, but both laptops share the same useful charging capabilities and lack MagSafe adapters.

Both the Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra feature stereo speakers and a 3.5 mm audio jack for audio connectivity. Both laptops support ray tracing and DLSS, offering advanced gaming features for improved graphics. Neither model includes Dolby Atmos support or a stylus, and neither has a fingerprint scanner for biometric security.

The Asus model comes with two microphones, while the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra has only one. Both laptops are equipped with a front camera but do not have 3D facial recognition, voice commands, or an S/PDIF Out port. Additionally, both models lack sensors like a gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, and compass, and neither has an optical disc drive.

Overall, the primary difference between these two models in terms of features is the number of microphones, with the Asus ROG Strix G16 offering two compared to the Thunderobot's single microphone. Otherwise, the two laptops are quite similar in terms of features, with both supporting advanced gaming technologies and offering basic audio and camera capabilities.

The Asus ROG Strix G16 (2025) G614 and the Thunderobot Zero 16 Ultra both feature similar specifications in several key areas, but there are a few differences worth noting. Both laptops support multi-display technology and 3D, and both use Intel Resizable BAR. However, the Asus model has a clock multiplier of 25, while the Thunderobot's clock multiplier is slightly lower at 24. This could impact the overall CPU performance, with the Asus potentially benefiting from slightly higher speeds in some scenarios.

The Asus ROG Strix G16 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 45W, which is lower than the Thunderobot's TDP of 80W, indicating that the Thunderobot may have higher power consumption and potentially more thermal output. The Asus model also has a maximum RAM speed of 5600 MHz and a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz, while the Thunderobot supports faster RAM at 6400 MHz and a higher GPU memory speed of 2000 MHz.

In terms of GPU architecture, both laptops use Blackwell architecture, but the Thunderobot features a wider memory bus (256-bit vs 128-bit on the Asus) and higher maximum memory bandwidth (811.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The Thunderobot also has more ROPs (96 vs 32) and shading units (7680 vs 3328), which may contribute to more robust graphics performance. Additionally, the Thunderobot has an unlocked multiplier, offering more potential flexibility for overclocking, while the Asus model’s multiplier is locked.