Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP 18" Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX 2.7GHz / Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070 Laptop / 32GB RAM / 1TB SSD VS Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 16"

The Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 are both gaming laptops, but they differ in size and weight. The ROG Strix G18 is significantly heavier at 3420 g, compared to the TUF Gaming F16, which weighs 2200 g. In terms of physical dimensions, the G18 is also larger with a width of 399 mm, a height of 298 mm, and a thickness of 23 mm, whereas the F16 is more compact, with a width of 354 mm, a height of 269 mm, and a thinner 17 mm profile.

Both laptops feature a backlit keyboard, but neither uses a fanless design. Neither model is weather-sealed or splashproof. The G18 has a much larger volume of 2734.746 cm³ compared to the TUF Gaming F16’s 1618.842 cm³, indicating a more substantial overall build for the G18.

In summary, while both are designed for gaming, the Asus ROG Strix G18 is bulkier and heavier with a larger footprint, while the Asus TUF Gaming F16 offers a more portable and compact design.

The display specifications of the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 share several similarities but also show key differences. Both laptops have a resolution of 2560 x 1600 px, which ensures sharp visuals, and use an LCD, LED-backlit, IPS display type for wide viewing angles and consistent color. Additionally, both screens have an anti-reflection coating to reduce glare.

The main difference between the two models lies in their screen size and pixel density. The G18 features an 18″ screen, while the TUF Gaming F16 has a smaller 16″ display. As a result, the pixel density of the F16 is slightly higher at 188 ppi, compared to the G18’s 167 ppi. This difference means that the F16’s screen will appear slightly sharper when looking at the same resolution, thanks to the smaller screen size packed with more pixels.

Both models support up to four displays, and neither has a touchscreen. These similarities indicate that while the G18 provides a larger viewing area, the F16 offers a bit more pixel density for potentially sharper details in a more compact form.

When comparing the performance specs of the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608, both models are similarly equipped in several key areas. Both laptops come with 32GB of RAM running at 5600 MHz, and both use flash storage with NVMe SSDs, ensuring fast data access. They also share the same GPU with 8GB of VRAM, utilizing the GDDR7 memory standard and delivering floating-point performance of 23.22 TFLOPS, which supports powerful gaming and multitasking capabilities.

In terms of CPU performance, the ROG Strix G18 offers a higher turbo clock speed of 5.4GHz, compared to the F16's 5.2GHz. Additionally, the G18 has a higher base CPU speed with 8 cores at 2.7GHz and 16 cores at 2.1GHz, while the F16 operates with 8 cores at 2.2GHz and 8 cores at 1.6GHz. Both laptops feature 24 CPU threads and support multithreading, but the G18's higher clock speeds suggest a potentially stronger raw CPU performance.

Other performance specs, such as GPU clock speed (2235 MHz) and GPU turbo speed (2520 MHz), are identical between the two models. Both laptops also support DirectX 12 Ultimate, PCIe 4, and have a maximum memory capacity of 64GB. The semiconductor size of both devices is 4 nm, and neither model supports XeSS (XMX) or has any specific mention of 64-bit limitations. These similarities indicate both laptops are well-equipped for high-performance tasks, with the G18 having a slight edge in CPU clock speeds.

When comparing the benchmark results of the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608, both products share the same PassMark (G3D) result of 19987, indicating that their graphics performance is identical. However, the overall PassMark score differs between the two. The G18 achieves a PassMark result of 56426, which is notably higher than the F16's result of 34910, suggesting stronger overall performance in the G18.

In terms of single-threaded performance, the G18 also leads with a PassMark (single) score of 4723, while the F16 scores 3862. This difference reflects a higher single-core processing capability in the G18, which may benefit tasks that rely more on single-threaded performance.

To summarize, while the two laptops show the same performance in graphics (G3D), the Asus ROG Strix G18 outperforms the TUF Gaming F16 in overall system benchmarks and single-threaded performance.

In terms of connectivity, both the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 offer a range of modern features. Both models include USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (USB-A) with 3 ports each, USB Type-C, HDMI outputs, Wi-Fi support, and Bluetooth connectivity, though they differ in a few areas. The G18 does not include USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) or USB 4 20Gbps ports, while the F16 has one USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) port and one USB 4 40Gbps port. Additionally, the F16 supports Thunderbolt 4, a feature not present on the G18.

For video output, both laptops feature HDMI 2.1 ports and support AirPlay, but the G18 has no Thunderbolt 3 or USB 4 40Gbps ports, while the F16 includes one Thunderbolt 4 port and one USB 4 40Gbps port. Both models also come with one RJ45 Ethernet port and support Wi-Fi 6E, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 4, though there’s no significant difference in their Wi-Fi versions.

Overall, while the connectivity options on both laptops are similar, the F16 offers additional support for Thunderbolt 4 and a USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) port, giving it an edge in terms of high-speed data transfer and external device compatibility.

When comparing the battery specifications of the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608, both laptops are equipped with a 90 Wh battery. Additionally, both models feature sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing for charging of devices even when the laptop is in sleep mode. Neither model includes a MagSafe power adapter.

These battery-related features are identical across both laptops, meaning users can expect similar charging capabilities and battery performance from each device, with no significant differences in this area.

In summary, the battery specs are the same for both models, with a shared 90 Wh capacity, sleep-and-charge USB ports, and the absence of a MagSafe power adapter.

In terms of features, both the Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 share several similarities. Both laptops are equipped with stereo speakers, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and support ray tracing and DLSS, which are key features for enhanced gaming experiences. They also both have a front camera and do not include a stylus or an optical disc drive. However, there are a few notable differences in additional features.

The G18 includes Dolby Atmos for superior audio quality, while the F16 does not. The G18 also has two microphones, compared to just one on the F16. Additionally, the G18 lacks 3D facial recognition and voice commands, whereas the F16 includes both features. Another difference is that the G18 is equipped with an accelerometer, while the F16 does not have this feature. Lastly, neither laptop includes a fingerprint scanner or a compass, and both lack S/PDIF Out ports, gyroscopes, GPS, or a stylus.

In summary, the G18 stands out with Dolby Atmos, dual microphones, and an accelerometer, while the F16 offers 3D facial recognition and voice commands. Both laptops are similarly equipped for immersive gaming, but each has unique features that may appeal to different user preferences.

The Asus ROG Strix G18 (2025) G815LP and the Asus TUF Gaming F16 (2025) FX608 share several similar specifications, though there are some notable differences. Both laptops use Intel Resizable BAR technology, support 3D, multi-display technology, and have Blackwell GPU architecture. They also have identical maximum memory bandwidth of 405.8 GB/s, GPU memory speed of 2000 MHz, and both support ECC memory. Additionally, both models use big.LITTLE technology and have integrated graphics.

The key difference between the two is the clock multiplier, with the G18 featuring a higher multiplier of 27 compared to the F16’s 22. This suggests that the G18 may have more flexibility in terms of performance scaling. The G18 also has an unlocked multiplier, while the F16 does not, meaning the G18 could offer more overclocking potential. The L3 cache is larger in the G18 at 36 MB, compared to 30 MB in the F16. The G18’s maximum RAM speed is higher as well, supporting up to 6400 MHz, whereas the F16 is limited to 5600 MHz.

In terms of CPU temperature, the G18 runs slightly hotter at 105 °C compared to the F16’s 100 °C. Both laptops have the same number of memory channels (2) and identical OpenCL and OpenGL versions. They also both support the same instruction sets, including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, and SSE 4.1, 4.2. The G18 also has a slightly higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 50W, which matches the F16’s TDP.