Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27"
MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27" MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Common Features

  • Both monitors have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 px.
  • Both monitors have a response time of 0.03 ms.
  • Both monitors have a refresh rate of 240Hz.
  • Both monitors have a maximum horizontal viewing angle of 178º.
  • Both monitors have a maximum vertical viewing angle of 178º.
  • Both monitors have anti-glare coating.
  • Both monitors have a matte panel.
  • Both monitors have a 10-bit color depth.
  • Both monitors have a contrast ratio of 1500000:1.
  • Both monitors support total tilt.
  • Both monitors have a swivel stand.
  • Both monitors support VESA mount.
  • Both monitors support portrait mode.
  • Both monitors have HDMI 2.1 ports.
  • Both monitors have DisplayPort outputs.
  • Both monitors have a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack.
  • Both monitors have USB Type-C connectivity.
  • Both monitors consume 0.5W in standby power mode.
  • Both monitors do not have stereo speakers.

Main Differences

  • The display type is OLED/AMOLED on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and QD-OLED, OLED/AMOLED on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The screen size is 26.5″ on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 31.5″ on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The pixel density is 166 ppi on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 139 ppi on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The adaptive synchronization options are Nvidia G-Sync, AMD FreeSync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and Nvidia G-Sync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The height is 369.2 mm on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 418 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The width is 610.3 mm on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 718 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The thickness is 66.5 mm on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 69 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The weight is 7440 g on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 9600 g on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The volume is 14983.96354 cm³ on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 20708.556 cm³ on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The brightness (typical) is 450 nits on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 250 nits on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Color calibration support is not available on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ but is available on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The display colors are 1073 million on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 1070 million on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The DisplayPort version is DisplayPort 1.4 on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and DisplayPort 2.1 on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The number of USB ports is 4 on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and 1 on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • The Picture-in-Picture (PiP) feature is available on Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ but not on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
Specs Comparison
Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27"

Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27"

MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Display:
Display type OLED/AMOLED QD-OLED, OLED/AMOLED
response time 0.03 ms 0.03 ms
screen size 26.5" 31.5"
resolution 3840 x 2160 px 3840 x 2160 px
pixel density 166 ppi 139 ppi
Adaptive synchronization Nvidia G-Sync, AMD FreeSync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible, AMD FreeSync Premium Pro Nvidia G-Sync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible
has anti-glare coating
refresh rate 240Hz 240Hz
maximum horizontal viewing angle 178º 178º
maximum vertical viewing angle 178º 178º
has a matte panel
has a glossy panel
has a touch screen

The Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ both feature OLED/AMOLED displays, providing excellent contrast and color accuracy. However, the MSI model also includes a QD-OLED layer, enhancing its color reproduction further. The Asus display is slightly smaller at 26.5″, compared to the 31.5″ of the MSI. Despite the size difference, both displays offer the same resolution of 3840 x 2160 px, resulting in a higher pixel density on the Asus, which stands at 166 ppi versus the MSI's 139 ppi.

Both monitors offer a fast 0.03 ms response time, ensuring smooth motion and minimal blur. They also share the same 240Hz refresh rate, which is ideal for fast-paced gaming. The maximum horizontal and vertical viewing angles are identical for both displays, reaching 178º, which ensures consistent image quality from different positions.

When it comes to additional features, both monitors are equipped with anti-glare coatings and matte panels, with no glossy panels or touch-screen capabilities. In terms of adaptive synchronization, the Asus monitor supports both Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync, including Nvidia G-Sync Compatible and AMD FreeSync Premium Pro. On the other hand, the MSI only supports Nvidia G-Sync and G-Sync Compatible.

General info:
Type Gaming Gaming
release date March 2025 January 2025
supports total tilt
Has a swivel stand
Supports VESA mount
height 369.2 mm 418 mm
width 610.3 mm 718 mm
thickness 66.5 mm 69 mm
weight 7440 g 9600 g
supports portrait mode
volume 14983.96354 cm³ 20708.556 cm³

Both the Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ are gaming monitors, designed with similar features to enhance gaming experiences. Both support total tilt, have swivel stands, and are compatible with VESA mounts, allowing for flexible setup options. In terms of height, the MSI model is taller, measuring 418 mm compared to the 369.2 mm height of the Asus. The MSI is also wider, at 718 mm, versus the 610.3 mm width of the Asus.

The thickness of the two monitors differs slightly as well, with the MSI being 69 mm thick, slightly thicker than the Asus at 66.5 mm. Regarding weight, the MSI is significantly heavier at 9600 g, compared to the Asus, which weighs 7440 g. The volume of the MSI monitor is also larger, at 20708.556 cm³, while the Asus has a volume of 14983.96354 cm³.

Both monitors are capable of supporting portrait mode, providing further flexibility for various uses. While both displays have similar core design features, the MSI’s larger dimensions and weight may be noticeable in terms of desk space and overall setup requirements.

Colors:
brightness (typical) 450 nits 250 nits
supports color calibration
display colors 1073 million 1070 million
bit depth 10-bit 10-bit
contrast ratio 1500000:1 1500000:1

The Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ differ slightly in their color-related specs. The Asus offers a higher typical brightness of 450 nits, while the MSI is lower at 250 nits. Both monitors support a 10-bit bit depth, ensuring smooth gradations of color. In terms of display colors, the Asus supports 1073 million colors, slightly surpassing the MSI, which supports 1070 million colors.

Another difference is that the Asus does not support color calibration, while the MSI offers color calibration support. This may give the MSI a slight advantage for users seeking precise color adjustments.

Both monitors share an impressive contrast ratio of 1500000:1, ensuring deep blacks and vibrant colors, which is typical for OLED displays.

Connectivity:
HDMI ports 2 2
supports Thunderbolt
DisplayPort outputs 1 1
DisplayPort version DisplayPort 1.4 DisplayPort 2.1
has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
has a DVI connector
USB ports 4 1
Has USB Type-C
HDMI version HDMI 2.1 HDMI 2.1
supports Ethernet
supports Wi-Fi
has AirPlay
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0
has a VGA connector

Both the Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ offer similar connectivity options with some differences. Both monitors feature 2 HDMI ports and 1 DisplayPort output, with the Asus using DisplayPort 1.4 and the MSI using DisplayPort 2.1. Both monitors also include HDMI 2.1, ensuring high bandwidth for modern devices, though the difference in DisplayPort version may affect performance for certain setups.

The Asus has 4 USB ports, compared to just 1 USB port on the MSI. Both monitors offer USB Type-C connectivity, allowing for versatile connection options. Additionally, both monitors include a 3.5 mm audio jack but lack DVI connectors, mini DisplayPort outputs, and VGA connectors.

Neither monitor supports Ethernet, Wi-Fi, or AirPlay, making them primarily reliant on wired connections for network access and streaming. The lack of Thunderbolt support is consistent between both models.

Power:
standby power consumption 0.5W 0.5W

Both the Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ have the same standby power consumption of 0.5W. This means that, when not in use but still powered on, both monitors draw the same amount of power, ensuring efficient energy usage during standby mode.

There are no differences in power consumption between the two models in this regard.

Features:
has PiP
has stereo speakers
has built-in smart TV
has a remote control
supports Dolby Digital
supports Dolby Digital Plus
has DTS Surround
has an ambient light sensor
has a front camera

The Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ differ slightly in terms of additional features. The Asus supports Picture-in-Picture (PiP), allowing users to view two input sources simultaneously, while the MSI does not support this feature. Both monitors lack stereo speakers, built-in smart TV functionality, remote control, Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital Plus support, DTS Surround, ambient light sensors, and front cameras.

While both monitors are similar in many of the features they lack, the Asus does offer the PiP functionality, which could be a valuable addition for multitasking or gaming with multiple inputs.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Asus ROG Strix OLED XG27UCDMG 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″. Both monitors share a resolution of 3840 x 2160 px, response time of 0.03 ms, and 240Hz refresh rate. However, they differ in several key areas: the Asus monitor has a 26.5″ screen size with a 166 ppi pixel density, while the MSI monitor features a larger 31.5″ screen and a lower 139 ppi pixel density. The MSI monitor also supports color calibration, while the Asus model does not. Additionally, the Asus monitor offers more USB ports (4) compared to the MSI monitor's 1 USB port.