Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG 32" VS LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B 32"

The Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B both feature 32-inch screens with 3840 x 2160 px resolution and a pixel density of 139 ppi. Both displays offer excellent horizontal and vertical viewing angles of 178º, ensuring consistent image quality from nearly any direction. The Asus model uses an LED-backlit LCD with IPS technology, while the LG model uses an OLED/AMOLED display, which generally provides deeper blacks and better contrast ratios compared to traditional LED displays.

When it comes to refresh rates, the LG UltraGear offers a faster 240Hz, compared to the 160Hz on the Asus display. This higher refresh rate on the LG model may provide a smoother experience, especially for fast-paced gaming. In terms of response time, the LG model is significantly faster at 0.03 ms, whereas the Asus has a 1 ms response time. Both products support Nvidia G-Sync and AMD FreeSync, but the LG model also supports Nvidia G-Sync Compatible in addition to the others.

Both displays are equipped with an anti-glare coating and matte panels, meaning both products will reduce reflections in well-lit rooms. Neither display has a glossy panel or a touch screen, so touch interaction is not supported by either. The Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG has a maximum horizontal and vertical viewing angle of 178º, which is the same as the LG model.

Both the Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B are gaming monitors with similar features. Both support tilt adjustment, have swivel stands, and can be mounted using VESA-compatible mounts, providing flexibility for various setups. They also support portrait mode, allowing for vertical screen orientation. The EU energy label for both monitors is rated F, which is consistent between the two models.

The dimensions of the two monitors differ slightly. The Asus ROG Strix is 430 mm in height, 717 mm in width, and 82 mm in thickness, while the LG UltraGear is a bit shorter at 411.8 mm in height, almost identical in width at 714.1 mm, and slimmer at 65 mm in thickness. The difference in height and thickness could slightly affect the overall look and placement of each monitor on a desk.

In terms of weight, the Asus ROG Strix is slightly heavier at 9900 g, compared to the LG UltraGear’s 9800 g. Additionally, the volume of the Asus monitor is 25281.42 cm³, which is larger than the 19114.3147 cm³ volume of the LG model, reflecting the difference in physical size between the two displays.

The Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B differ slightly in their color specifications. The Asus model has a typical brightness of 350 nits, while the LG model is lower at 275 nits. Both monitors support a 10-bit color depth, providing a broad color range, and can display millions of colors, with the Asus supporting 1073 million colors and the LG supporting 1070 million colors. This is a small difference, likely not noticeable in everyday use.

In terms of contrast ratio, the two displays show a significant difference. The Asus ROG Strix offers a contrast ratio of 1000:1, while the LG UltraGear OLED boasts a much higher contrast ratio of 1500000:1, thanks to its OLED panel, which is capable of displaying deeper blacks and greater contrast levels.

Another difference is that the Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG does not support color calibration, whereas the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B does. This means that the LG model allows for more precise color adjustments, while the Asus model relies on its factory settings.

In terms of connectivity, the Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B both offer solid options, but there are some differences. The Asus monitor has 1 HDMI port, while the LG model provides 2 HDMI ports, allowing for more simultaneous device connections. Both monitors feature a DisplayPort output, but the Asus has DisplayPort 1.4, while the LG model is equipped with the newer DisplayPort 2.1.

Neither monitor supports Thunderbolt, Wi-Fi, or Ethernet, and neither has AirPlay. Both monitors include a 3.5 mm audio jack for external audio connections. The Asus model supports USB Type-C, while the LG model does not, which could be a notable difference depending on your peripheral needs.

Both monitors lack older connectors like DVI, VGA, and mini DisplayPort outputs, making them more modern in terms of available ports, but the LG model has an extra HDMI port and a more advanced DisplayPort version, which could be useful for users with specific connection requirements.

The power consumption of the Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B differs in terms of operating power. The Asus monitor has an operating power consumption of 30W, while the LG model consumes more at 55W. Both monitors have the same standby power consumption of 0.5W, meaning they use the same amount of power when not actively in use.

In general, the Asus ROG Strix is more power-efficient during operation compared to the LG UltraGear OLED, which could be a consideration if energy consumption is a key factor for you.

The Asus ROG Strix XG32UCG and the LG UltraGear OLED 32GS95UV-B differ in several additional features. The Asus monitor does not support PiP (Picture-in-Picture) or stereo speakers, while the LG model does offer PiP functionality and includes stereo speakers. Neither monitor has built-in smart TV functionality, a remote control, or support for Dolby Digital or Dolby Digital Plus. Both also lack DTS Surround and a front camera.

However, there are a couple of additional features on the LG model that the Asus model does not have. The LG monitor is equipped with an ambient light sensor, which adjusts the screen brightness based on the surrounding light, while the Asus does not include this feature.

Overall, the LG UltraGear offers more multimedia-related features like PiP and stereo speakers, as well as the ambient light sensor, which might be appealing if those are important to you.