Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27"
MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27" MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Common Features

  • Both products have a QD-OLED display type.
  • Both products have a response time of 0.03 ms.
  • Both products have a resolution of 3840 x 2160 px.
  • Both products have an anti-glare coating.
  • Both products have a 240Hz refresh rate.
  • Both products have a maximum horizontal viewing angle of 178º.
  • Both products have a maximum vertical viewing angle of 178º.
  • Both products have a matte panel.
  • Both products are gaming monitors.
  • Both products support total tilt.
  • Both products have a swivel stand.
  • Both products support VESA mount.
  • Both products support portrait mode.
  • Both products have a typical brightness of 250 nits.
  • Both products have a 10-bit bit depth.
  • Both products have HDMI 2.1 ports.
  • Both products have a DisplayPort 2.1 output.
  • Both products have USB Type-C ports.
  • Both products have 2 HDMI ports.
  • Both products have a standby power consumption of 0.5W.

Main Differences

  • Screen size is 26.5″ on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 31.5″ on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Pixel density is 166 ppi on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 139 ppi on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Adaptive synchronization is AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and Nvidia G-Sync Compatible on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and Nvidia G-Sync and Nvidia G-Sync Compatible on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Height is 369 mm on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 418 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Width is 610 mm on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 718 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Thickness is 70 mm on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 69 mm on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Weight is 7620 g on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 9600 g on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Volume is 15756.3 cm³ on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 20708.556 cm³ on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Supports color calibration on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ but not on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″.
  • Display colors are 1073 million on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 1070 million on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • sRGB coverage is 145% on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 138% on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ but not on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″.
  • USB ports are 4 on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and 1 on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
  • Has PiP (Picture in Picture) on Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ but not on MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″.
Specs Comparison
Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27"

Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27"

MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32"

Display:
Display type QD-OLED, OLED/AMOLED QD-OLED, OLED/AMOLED
response time 0.03 ms 0.03 ms
screen size 26.5" 31.5"
resolution 3840 x 2160 px 3840 x 2160 px
pixel density 166 ppi 139 ppi
Adaptive synchronization AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible Nvidia G-Sync, Nvidia G-Sync Compatible
has anti-glare coating
refresh rate 240Hz 240Hz
maximum horizontal viewing angle 178º 178º
maximum vertical viewing angle 178º 178º
has a matte panel
has a glossy panel
has a touch screen

Both the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ use QD-OLED displays, which offer vibrant colors and high contrast. The Asus model features a 26.5″ screen size, while the MSI is larger at 31.5″. Both displays share the same resolution of 3840 x 2160 px, but due to the difference in screen size, the Asus has a higher pixel density at 166 ppi compared to the MSI’s 139 ppi.

When it comes to response time, both models offer an impressive 0.03 ms, ensuring minimal motion blur for fast-paced content. Both displays also support adaptive synchronization, with the Asus offering AMD FreeSync Premium Pro and Nvidia G-Sync compatibility, while the MSI supports only Nvidia G-Sync and is also Nvidia G-Sync compatible.

In terms of viewing angles, both monitors provide 178º horizontal and vertical maximum viewing angles. They also share a matte panel design with anti-glare coating, ensuring a more comfortable viewing experience in bright environments. Neither of the monitors features a glossy panel or touch functionality.

General info:
Type Gaming Gaming
release date January 2025 January 2025
supports total tilt
Has a swivel stand
Supports VESA mount
height 369 mm 418 mm
width 610 mm 718 mm
thickness 70 mm 69 mm
weight 7620 g 9600 g
supports portrait mode
volume 15756.3 cm³ 20708.556 cm³

Both the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ are classified as gaming monitors, and both models support features like total tilt, a swivel stand, VESA mount compatibility, and portrait mode. The key differences appear in their physical dimensions and weight. The Asus monitor has a height of 369 mm, width of 610 mm, and thickness of 70 mm, weighing 7620 g. In contrast, the MSI monitor is taller at 418 mm, wider at 718 mm, and slightly thinner at 69 mm, with a weight of 9600 g.

The MSI model also has a larger volume of 20708.556 cm³, compared to the Asus’s volume of 15756.3 cm³. Despite these differences in size, both monitors offer the same basic functionality and mounting options, making them flexible choices for a variety of setups.

In summary, while the general features and capabilities are quite similar between the two models, the MSI offers a larger, heavier design with a slightly thinner profile, while the Asus is more compact in comparison.

Colors:
brightness (typical) 250 nits 250 nits
supports color calibration
display colors 1073 million 1070 million
bit depth 10-bit 10-bit
sRGB coverage 145% 138%

Both the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ have a typical brightness of 250 nits, providing a similar level of brightness for both monitors. When it comes to color features, the Asus supports a wider sRGB coverage at 145%, compared to the MSI’s 138%. The Asus also supports a higher number of display colors, with 1073 million, while the MSI supports 1070 million colors.

In terms of bit depth, both monitors share the same 10-bit depth, allowing for smooth color transitions and a high level of color accuracy. The key distinction here is that the MSI model supports color calibration, which is not available on the Asus model. This may be important for users who require precise color accuracy in their work.

Overall, both monitors offer strong color performance, with the Asus having a slight edge in color coverage, while the MSI adds the advantage of color calibration support.

Connectivity:
HDMI ports 2 2
supports Thunderbolt
DisplayPort outputs 1 1
DisplayPort version DisplayPort 2.1 DisplayPort 2.1
has a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack
has a DVI connector
USB ports 4 1
Has USB Type-C
HDMI version HDMI 2.1 HDMI 2.1
supports Ethernet
supports Wi-Fi
has AirPlay
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0
has a VGA connector

Both the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ offer similar connectivity options. Both monitors have two HDMI ports and one DisplayPort 2.1 output, as well as USB Type-C support. The HDMI version is also the same for both, at HDMI 2.1. However, the Asus offers more USB ports, with a total of 4, while the MSI provides just 1 USB port.

A notable difference is that the Asus has no socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, while the MSI includes this feature. Neither model supports Thunderbolt, Ethernet, Wi-Fi, AirPlay, mini DisplayPort outputs, or VGA connectors.

Overall, both monitors have similar high-end display connectivity, but the Asus offers more USB ports, while the MSI provides a 3.5 mm audio jack socket.

Power:
standby power consumption 0.5W 0.5W

Both the Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ have identical standby power consumption, rated at 0.5W. This means that when in standby mode, both monitors draw the same amount of power, offering similar energy efficiency in this regard.

There are no other power-related specifications provided for either product, so the comparison is limited to this single metric. In terms of standby power usage, the two models are perfectly aligned.

Overall, there is no distinction between the two monitors when it comes to standby power consumption.

Features:
has PiP
has stereo speakers
has built-in smart TV
has a remote control
supports Dolby Digital
supports Dolby Digital Plus
has DTS Surround
has an ambient light sensor
has a front camera

The Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and the MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″ offer different features. The Asus model supports PiP (Picture-in-Picture), allowing users to view multiple sources simultaneously, while the MSI does not have this feature. Both monitors lack stereo speakers, built-in smart TV functionality, remote control support, Dolby Digital and Dolby Digital Plus, DTS Surround, an ambient light sensor, and a front camera.

In terms of additional features, the key distinction between these two monitors is that the Asus supports PiP, which the MSI does not. All other features related to audio, smart functions, and sensors are absent from both models.

Therefore, the Asus has a unique feature in PiP support, while the MSI does not provide this option.

Comparison Summary

This is a specification comparison between Asus ROG Swift OLED PG27UCDM 27″ and MSI MPG 322URX QD-OLED 32″. Both monitors share features like a QD-OLED display type, a response time of 0.03 ms, and a 240Hz refresh rate. However, there are key differences, such as screen size with the Asus model at 26.5″ and the MSI at 31.5″, pixel density being higher on the Asus at 166 ppi versus the MSI's 139 ppi, and the adaptive synchronization with the Asus supporting AMD FreeSync Premium Pro, while the MSI uses only Nvidia G-Sync. Other differences include height, with the MSI being taller at 418 mm compared to the Asus's 369 mm, and USB ports, with the Asus offering 4 while the MSI has just 1.