Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16" VS Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16" (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB)

Both the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) share identical design specifications. The weight for both products is 1950 g, and neither uses a fanless design. Both feature a backlit keyboard, and their volume is 1219.176 cm³. The dimensions of both laptops are identical, with a width of 354 mm, a height of 246 mm, and a thickness of 14 mm. Additionally, neither model is weather-sealed (splashproof) or has a rugged build.

In terms of design, there are no differences between the two products when considering these specifications. Both are gaming laptops with the same build characteristics, offering similar form factors and features such as the backlit keyboard.

Ultimately, if you are choosing between the two based solely on design specs, the experience will be the same for both models.

The display specifications for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are identical. Both models feature a 16″ screen size with a resolution of 2560 x 1600 px and a pixel density of 188 ppi. The display type is OLED/AMOLED for both laptops, and neither has a touch screen. Both also come with a refresh rate of 240Hz, and neither includes an anti-reflection coating. Furthermore, both support up to 4 displays.

Since both products share the same display characteristics, there are no differences between them in terms of screen quality, resolution, or features. Whether you opt for the standard or the Ultra version, the display experience will be identical.

In summary, the display specifications of these two models are completely matched, offering the same visual performance and capabilities.

The performance specifications of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) differ in a few key areas. Both models feature 64GB of RAM with a speed of 7467 MHz, use flash storage, and have an internal storage capacity of 2048GB. They also share the same CPU configuration, with 6 cores running at 2.9 GHz and 8 cores running at 2.7 GHz, resulting in 16 threads. Additionally, both use an NVMe SSD and support DirectX 12 Ultimate, multithreading, and 64-bit systems.

The primary differences are in the graphics-related specs. The first model (GU605 16″) comes with 24GB of VRAM, a floating-point performance of 31.8 TFLOPS, and a higher texture rate of 496.9 GTexels/s and pixel rate of 193.9 GPixel/s. In comparison, the second model (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080) has 16GB of VRAM, 23.04 TFLOPS of floating-point performance, a texture rate of 384 GTexels/s, and a pixel rate of 144 GPixel/s. The GPU clock speed is also slightly higher in the first model at 990 MHz, compared to 975 MHz in the second model, though both have similar turbo speeds (1515 MHz and 1500 MHz, respectively).

Despite these differences in VRAM, floating-point performance, and GPU clock speeds, the overall CPU, memory, and storage specifications are identical between the two models. These differences in GPU specs suggest a slight performance variance, but the rest of the performance factors are the same for both laptops.

The benchmark results for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are identical. Both products achieved the same scores across multiple benchmark tests. For Geekbench 6, both models have a multi-core score of 17173 and a single-core score of 2897. Similarly, their PassMark results also match, with both scoring 33969 in the overall benchmark and 4472 in the single-core test.

As a result, there are no differences in terms of performance benchmarks between the two laptops. Despite the differences in their GPU configurations, these benchmark results show that the CPU and overall system performance are exactly the same in both models.

Therefore, when it comes to raw performance, particularly as measured by Geekbench and PassMark, both the standard and Ultra versions of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ provide an equivalent experience.

The connectivity options of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are identical. Both models offer the same set of USB ports: 1 USB 3.2 Gen 2 port (USB-C), 2 USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (USB-A), and 1 USB 4 40Gbps port. They also both have 1 Thunderbolt 4 port and no USB 3.2 Gen 1 or USB 2.0 ports. The HDMI output is available on both models, with an HDMI 2.1 version, and both laptops support USB Type-C connectivity.

For wireless connectivity, both laptops support Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), Wi-Fi 6E (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n). They also both feature Bluetooth 5.4, AirPlay support, and an external memory slot. Additionally, neither model has RJ45 ports, DisplayPort outputs, mini DisplayPort outputs, or a VGA connector.

Ultimately, the connectivity features are identical across both products, offering a robust and similar range of options for both models.

The battery specifications for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are identical. Both models are equipped with a 90 Wh battery and feature sleep-and-charge USB ports. Neither model includes a MagSafe power adapter.

Since both laptops share the same battery size and charging features, the battery performance and capabilities will be the same for both models.

In summary, there are no differences in the battery specifications between the two models, offering equivalent power options and charging capabilities.

The features of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are identical. Both models come with stereo speakers, a 3.5 mm audio jack, and support ray tracing and DLSS. Additionally, both laptops feature Dolby Atmos, 3 microphones, and 3D facial recognition. Neither includes a stylus, fingerprint scanner, or voice command functionality. Both models also have a front camera but lack S/PDIF Out, a gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, compass, or an optical disc drive.

There are no differences between the two products in terms of features, offering the same set of functionalities and hardware for multimedia and user interactions.

In conclusion, both laptops share an identical set of features, ensuring the same user experience when it comes to these specifications.

The miscellaneous specifications for the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ and the Asus ROG Zephyrus G16 (2025) GU605 16″ (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080 Laptop / 64GB RAM / 2TB) are mostly identical, with a few notable differences. Both models have a clock multiplier of 29, support Intel Resizable BAR, and feature the Blackwell GPU architecture. They also both have integrated graphics, 24 MB of L3 cache, and use big.LITTLE technology. The memory bus width, effective memory speed (25400 MHz), maximum memory bandwidth (811.5 GB/s), GPU memory speed (2000 MHz), and the number of transistors (17800 million) are the same in both models. Both also support 3D, multi-display technology, ECC memory, and OpenCL version 3, as well as OpenGL version 4.6.

The primary difference between the two models lies in the GPU specifications. The first model (GU605 16″) has 128 render output units (ROPs), 328 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 10496 shading units. In comparison, the second model (Ultra 9 285H / RTX 5080) has 96 ROPs, 256 TMUs, and 7680 shading units. Additionally, the first model has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 95W, while the second model has a TDP of 80W. The PassMark result (overclocked) is the same for both models at 34411, but the GPU architecture and other graphical specifications show some distinctions.

Both models share many of the same base specifications, but the differences in GPU and TDP may have an impact on thermal management and performance in certain scenarios. However, the overall system architecture, including the CPU, RAM, and integrated graphics, is the same in both models.