Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 14" (Ryzen 7 260 / RTX 5060 Laptop / 16GB RAM / 1TB) VS Asus V16 (V3607) 16"

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) both belong to the gaming laptop category, but their design characteristics differ in several ways. The TUF Gaming A14 weighs 1460 g, while the V16 is notably heavier at 1950 g. This makes the TUF Gaming A14 lighter and potentially more portable compared to the V16. Both laptops feature a backlit keyboard, ensuring a similar user experience in low-light environments.

In terms of dimensions, the TUF Gaming A14 is more compact, with a width of 311 mm, a height of 227 mm, and a thickness of 16 mm. The V16, on the other hand, is larger, measuring 357 mm in width, 250 mm in height, and 18 mm in thickness. The V16's larger size results in a greater overall volume of 1606.5 cm³, compared to the TUF Gaming A14's 1129.552 cm³. This suggests that the V16 offers a bigger form factor, potentially providing more space for internal components.

Neither laptop uses a fanless design, so both require active cooling. Neither model is weather-sealed (splashproof) or has a rugged build, making them less suited for extreme environments. Overall, the design differences between these two models reflect a balance of portability and size, with the TUF Gaming A14 being more compact and lighter, while the V16 is larger and heavier.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) offer similar displays in terms of resolution and display technology, but there are a few key differences. Both laptops feature a 2560 x 1600 px resolution, ensuring sharp visuals on their respective screens. However, the TUF Gaming A14 has a slightly higher pixel density of 215 ppi compared to the V16's 188 ppi. This means the TUF Gaming A14 will provide a sharper image, particularly on its smaller 14″ screen.

While the V16 comes with a larger 16″ screen, the pixel density is lower, which may affect the clarity of text and details, especially when compared to the TUF Gaming A14. Both displays are LCD, LED-backlit, and IPS, providing good color accuracy and wide viewing angles. Both also have an anti-reflection coating, which helps reduce glare in bright environments.

In terms of refresh rate, the TUF Gaming A14 supports 165Hz, which is higher than the V16's 144Hz. This difference may lead to a smoother visual experience, especially in fast-paced gaming or video content. Both laptops can support up to four external displays, offering plenty of options for multi-monitor setups.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) have similar performance features but also some notable differences. The TUF Gaming A14 is equipped with 16GB of RAM running at 7500 MHz, while the V16 has 32GB of RAM at 5600 MHz, offering double the memory capacity. However, the TUF Gaming A14's RAM speed is faster, which could lead to better performance in memory-intensive tasks. Both laptops use flash storage with 1024GB of internal space and feature NVMe SSDs for fast data access.

When it comes to the CPU, the TUF Gaming A14 has an 8-core processor running at 3.8 GHz with a turbo clock speed of 5.1GHz, supporting 16 threads. The V16 features a more complex configuration with a 6-core processor running at 2.7 GHz and 8 cores at 2 GHz, with a turbo clock speed of 5.8GHz and supporting 20 threads. This difference in the CPU architecture and thread count may affect multi-tasking performance, with the V16 potentially handling more parallel processes simultaneously.

Both laptops come with an 8GB VRAM, use GDDR7 memory, and support DirectX 12 (with the V16 offering DirectX 12 Ultimate). The TUF Gaming A14 has a GPU clock speed of 800 MHz and a turbo frequency of 2700 MHz, while the V16's GPU operates at a slightly higher clock speed of 952 MHz, with a turbo of 1455 MHz. Both laptops support multithreading, PCI Express (PCIe) version 4, and 64-bit architecture, but the V16 uses a 5nm semiconductor size, while the TUF Gaming A14 uses a 4nm semiconductor. This difference in semiconductor technology may impact overall power efficiency and performance at the hardware level.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) differ in their PassMark benchmark results. The TUF Gaming A14 scores a total of 29915, while the V16 slightly outperforms it with a score of 31602. This indicates that the V16 may have a slight edge in overall performance based on the PassMark test.

Looking at the single-threaded performance, the TUF Gaming A14 scores 3826, while the V16 achieves a higher single-thread result of 4404. This suggests that the V16 could potentially offer better performance in tasks that rely more heavily on single-thread processing, such as certain applications and workloads.

Overall, both laptops show strong performance in the PassMark benchmark tests, with the V16 leading in both overall and single-threaded performance by a small margin.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) offer a similar set of connectivity features, though there are a few notable differences. Both laptops support Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) standards, providing strong wireless connectivity options. They also both include Bluetooth 5.3 for wireless peripheral support, as well as HDMI outputs with HDMI 2.1 support.

In terms of USB ports, the TUF Gaming A14 has one USB 3.2 Gen 2 port (USB-C), two USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports (USB-A), and one USB 4 40Gbps port, while the V16 lacks USB 3.2 Gen 2 USB-C and USB 4 ports but includes one USB 3.2 Gen 1 port (USB-C) and two USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-A). Both models offer USB Type-C, but the TUF Gaming A14 has the advantage of the higher-speed USB 4 40Gbps port.

Regarding external memory support, the TUF Gaming A14 has an external memory slot, while the V16 does not provide any external memory slot. Both laptops feature AirPlay for wireless display streaming and lack VGA connectors. Neither has RJ45 ports or DisplayPort outputs, but both come with one HDMI port, enabling external display connectivity.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) have some differences in their battery specifications. The TUF Gaming A14 is equipped with a 73 Wh battery, while the V16 has a smaller 63 Wh battery. This difference in battery size may suggest that the TUF Gaming A14 could offer longer battery life under similar usage conditions, though actual performance would depend on various factors.

Both laptops lack a MagSafe power adapter, so they do not offer this specific form of magnetic charging connection. However, the V16 includes sleep-and-charge USB ports, which the TUF Gaming A14 does not have. This feature on the V16 allows it to charge devices while the laptop is in sleep mode, which could be a useful convenience for users.

In summary, the TUF Gaming A14 has a larger battery, but the V16 offers the advantage of sleep-and-charge USB ports for added charging flexibility.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) share several features, but there are some differences worth noting. Both laptops include stereo speakers and a 3.5 mm audio jack, ensuring quality audio output. Additionally, both support ray tracing and DLSS, providing advanced graphics capabilities for gaming and media applications.

However, the TUF Gaming A14 has Dolby Atmos support, while the V16 does not. The TUF Gaming A14 also includes two microphones for improved sound capture, whereas the V16 only has one. The TUF Gaming A14 features 3D facial recognition and voice command support, which the V16 lacks, making the A14 more equipped for hands-free interaction. Both laptops have a front camera, but the TUF Gaming A14 offers more advanced features in this area.

Neither laptop includes a stylus, fingerprint scanner, S/PDIF Out port, gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, compass, or optical disc drive. The TUF Gaming A14 also stands out with its additional 3D facial recognition and voice command functionality, while the V16 does not offer these features.

The Asus TUF Gaming A14 (2025) FA401 and the Asus V16 (V3607) both have impressive technical specifications, though there are some differences in certain areas. The TUF Gaming A14 has a clock multiplier of 38, while the V16 is set at 27, which might suggest different CPU performance profiles, especially considering the TUF Gaming A14's higher clock multiplier. Both laptops feature two memory channels and a maximum RAM speed of 7500 MHz for the A14 and 5600 MHz for the V16, though the V16 supports ECC memory, which the TUF Gaming A14 does not.

Both laptops have integrated graphics and support 3D and multi-display technology. They share the same GPU architecture (Blackwell), with identical GPU memory speed (1750 MHz) and maximum memory bandwidth (448 GB/s). However, the TUF Gaming A14 has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 render output units (ROPs), while the V16 offers significantly higher numbers—3328 shading units, 104 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. This suggests that the V16 has more powerful GPU capabilities for tasks that rely heavily on GPU performance.

Both laptops have a thermal design power (TDP) of 45W and share a number of other features, such as supporting Intel Resizable BAR and having 100°C CPU temperatures. They also have the same number of transistors (21900 million) and support double precision floating point (DPFP). Additionally, both laptops use the same OpenCL and OpenGL versions (2.1 and 4.6, respectively). The V16 uses big.LITTLE technology, which the TUF Gaming A14 does not.