Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB VS Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

When comparing the performance specs of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, there are several key differences. The GPU clock speed of the Asus card is 2407 MHz, while the Sapphire card has a lower clock speed of 1700 MHz. However, the Sapphire GPU turbo speed of 3290 MHz surpasses the Asus turbo of 2572 MHz, indicating better performance under high load for the Sapphire card.

In terms of pixel rate, the Sapphire card outperforms the Asus, with 210.6 GPixel/s compared to 123.5 GPixel/s. The Sapphire also has a higher texture rate, delivering 421.1 GTexels/s, whereas the Asus offers 370.4 GTexels/s. These differences suggest the Sapphire card has the edge in raw graphical throughput.

The floating-point performance of the two cards is also noteworthy. The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti offers 23.7 TFLOPS, while the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT delivers a higher 26.95 TFLOPS, indicating stronger floating-point computation power in the Sapphire card. In terms of GPU memory, the Asus card operates at 1750 MHz, while the Sapphire card has a significantly faster memory speed of 2518 MHz. The number of shading units, texture mapping units (TMUs), and render output units (ROPs) differ as well; the Asus card has 4608 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 48 ROPs, while the Sapphire card has 2048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. Finally, both cards support Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), offering similar capabilities in this regard.

When comparing the memory specifications of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, there are a few notable differences. The Asus card features an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, which is faster than the Sapphire card's effective memory speed of 20000 MHz. This suggests the Asus card has a higher data transfer rate for its memory.

In terms of memory bandwidth, the Asus card offers a maximum of 448 GB/s, which again is higher than the Sapphire's 322.3 GB/s, indicating the Asus card can handle more data throughput. However, the Sapphire card has a significant advantage in VRAM, with 16GB of memory compared to the Asus card’s 8GB. This means the Sapphire card can support more demanding workloads and higher-resolution textures, benefiting tasks that require large memory capacity.

Both cards use a 128-bit memory bus width, meaning they share the same data path for memory communication. Additionally, both the Asus and Sapphire cards support ECC memory (Error-Correcting Code), ensuring data integrity during memory operations. Finally, the Asus card uses GDDR7 memory, while the Sapphire card uses GDDR6 memory, with GDDR7 generally offering higher performance, but this depends on the specific implementation and use case.

Looking at the features of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and ray tracing, ensuring a similar level of compatibility with modern games and graphical effects. However, the two cards differ slightly in their OpenCL support, with the Asus card supporting version 3, while the Sapphire card is limited to version 2.2.

In terms of multi-display technology, both cards support it, but the Asus card can handle up to 4 displays, while the Sapphire card supports only 3. The Asus card also supports DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), providing a potential performance boost in games that support it, whereas the Sapphire card does not have DLSS support.

The Asus card features RGB lighting, a popular aesthetic option, while the Sapphire card lacks this feature. Both cards support 3D technology, and neither card includes XeSS (XMX) support. Additionally, the Asus card uses Intel’s Resizable BAR, while the Sapphire card uses AMD’s SAM (Smart Access Memory), reflecting the preference for different platform technologies. Both cards are free from LHR (Lite Hash Rate) limitations, ensuring unimpeded mining performance.

When comparing the ports of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, both cards have similar HDMI output capabilities, with each having one HDMI port that supports HDMI 2.1b. However, there is a difference in the number of DisplayPort outputs. The Asus card includes 3 DisplayPort outputs, while the Sapphire card has only 2 DisplayPort outputs.

Both cards lack USB-C, DVI, and mini DisplayPort outputs, so there is no difference in those aspects. Overall, the main distinction is the Asus card's ability to support more DisplayPort connections, which could be beneficial for users with multiple monitors.

Looking at the general information for the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 8GB and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, there are a few notable differences. The GPU architectures differ, with the Asus card using Blackwell, while the Sapphire card utilizes RDNA 4.0. Both cards use PCIe version 5, ensuring modern and high-speed connectivity with compatible motherboards.

The thermal design power (TDP) of the Asus card is 180W, which is slightly higher than the Sapphire card's 170W, indicating the Asus card may have a slightly higher power consumption under load. The Asus card also uses a 5 nm semiconductor size, while the Sapphire card uses a more advanced 4 nm process, suggesting that the Sapphire card may be more efficient in terms of transistor density.

In terms of physical dimensions, the Asus card is wider and taller, measuring 302 mm in length and 133.5 mm in height, compared to the Sapphire card's 240 mm length and 124 mm height. Both cards do not feature air-water cooling and have the same number of transistors, with the Asus card having 21.9 billion and the Sapphire card slightly ahead with 29.7 billion transistors.