Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB VS Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB

When comparing the performance specifications of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB, both cards have some notable similarities and differences. Both products have the same GPU clock speed of 2407 MHz, but the Manli card has a higher GPU turbo speed of 2572 MHz, compared to 2662 MHz on the Asus card.

For pixel rate, the Asus card leads with a value of 127.8 GPixel/s, while the Manli card is slightly behind at 123.5 GPixel/s. Similarly, the Asus card also has a higher texture rate at 383.3 GTexels/s compared to the Manli's 370.4 GTexels/s. Both cards are equipped with the same number of shading units (4608), texture mapping units (TMUs) at 144, and render output units (ROPs) at 48, so these specs are identical across the two products.

In terms of floating-point performance, the Asus card offers 24.53 TFLOPS, which is marginally better than the 23.7 TFLOPS provided by the Manli card. Both cards feature GPU memory speeds of 1750 MHz and include support for Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP), which is an important consideration for certain high-performance tasks.

The memory specifications for the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB are identical across the board. Both cards feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz and a maximum memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.

Each card comes equipped with 16GB of VRAM and utilizes GDDR7 memory. Additionally, both cards have a memory bus width of 128-bit and support ECC (Error-Correcting Code) memory, ensuring data integrity in high-performance environments.

Since all these memory-related specifications are the same for both models, users can expect equivalent memory performance regardless of which card they choose.

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB share almost identical feature sets. Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3.0, and are capable of multi-display technology, ray tracing, and 3D rendering. They also support DLSS and Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not mentioned for either card), with neither card offering XeSS (XMX) support.

One key difference is that the Asus card includes RGB lighting, while the Manli card does not. However, both cards support up to four displays, so multi-monitor setups are fully supported on both models. Additionally, neither card includes LHR (Lite Hash Rate), which may be relevant to those concerned with mining performance.

Overall, these two models are very similar in terms of features, with the primary difference being the presence of RGB lighting on the Asus card.

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB have identical port configurations. Both cards include one HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b support, as well as three DisplayPort outputs. Neither card features USB-C, DVI, or mini DisplayPort outputs.

With these shared port specifications, both models offer the same flexibility for connecting to displays, with no noticeable differences in the number or type of outputs available.

In summary, the ports and connectivity options are the same for both the Asus and Manli graphics cards, ensuring similar display compatibility for both products.

The general specifications of the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5060 Ti OC Edition 16GB and the Manli Nebula GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB are nearly identical. Both cards use the Blackwell GPU architecture, feature a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 180W, and are built on a 5 nm semiconductor process with 21900 million transistors. They also both support PCI Express 5.0 and lack air-water cooling systems.

One difference between the two models is their physical size. The Asus card is wider, measuring 302 mm in length and 133.5 mm in height, while the Manli card is more compact, at 239 mm in length and 127 mm in height. This size difference could impact case compatibility depending on the user's setup.

Overall, the two products share the same core specifications, with the main distinction being the physical dimensions of the cards.