Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070
Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III

Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III

Overview

Welcome to our detailed spec comparison between the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III. Both cards share the same Blackwell GPU core, but they diverge in ways that could matter depending on your setup. In this comparison, we examine their physical dimensions and display connectivity to help you decide which card fits your build and monitor configuration best.

Common Features

  • Both cards have a GPU clock speed of 2325 MHz.
  • Both cards have a GPU turbo speed of 2512 MHz.
  • Both cards deliver a pixel rate of 201 GPixel/s.
  • Both cards offer 30.87 TFLOPS of floating-point performance.
  • Both cards have a texture rate of 482.3 GTexels/s.
  • Both cards have a GPU memory speed of 1750 MHz.
  • Both cards feature 6144 shading units.
  • Both cards have 192 texture mapping units (TMUs).
  • Both cards have an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz.
  • Both cards provide a maximum memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s.
  • Both cards come with 12 GB of VRAM.
  • Both cards use GDDR7 memory.
  • Both cards have a 192-bit memory bus width.
  • ECC memory is supported on both cards.
  • Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate.
  • Both cards support OpenGL version 4.6.
  • Both cards support OpenCL version 3.
  • Multi-display technology is supported on both cards.
  • Ray tracing is supported on both cards.
  • DLSS is supported on both cards.
  • 3D support is available on both cards.
  • XeSS (XMX) is not available on either card.
  • Both cards include an HDMI output with HDMI 2.1b.
  • Both cards feature 3 DisplayPort outputs.
  • Neither card has USB-C ports, DVI outputs, or mini DisplayPort outputs.
  • Both cards are based on the Blackwell GPU architecture.
  • Both cards have a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 250W.
  • Both cards use PCI Express version 5.
  • Both cards are built on a 5 nm semiconductor process.
  • Both cards feature 31,100 million transistors.
  • Neither card uses air-water cooling.

Main Differences

  • HDMI port count is 2 on the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and 1 on the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III.
  • Width is 329 mm on the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and 291.9 mm on the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III.
  • Height is 140 mm on the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and 116.5 mm on the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III.
Specs Comparison
Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070

Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III

Performance:
GPU clock speed 2325 MHz 2325 MHz
GPU turbo 2512 MHz 2512 MHz
pixel rate 201 GPixel/s 201 GPixel/s
floating-point performance 30.87 TFLOPS 30.87 TFLOPS
texture rate 482.3 GTexels/s 482.3 GTexels/s
GPU memory speed 1750 MHz 1750 MHz
shading units 6144 6144
texture mapping units (TMUs) 192 192
render output units (ROPs) 80 80
Has Double Precision Floating Point (DPFP)

When comparing the performance specs of the Asus TUF Gaming RTX 5070 and the Gainward RTX 5070 Python III, the data tells a straightforward story: these two cards are built on an identical performance foundation. Both share the same 2325 MHz base clock and 2512 MHz boost clock, meaning neither card has a factory overclocking advantage out of the box. In practice, this translates to indistinguishable frame rates and compute throughput under equivalent cooling and power conditions.

The underlying hardware pipeline is also a perfect match. Both GPUs feature 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, which collectively determine how efficiently the card processes geometry, textures, and final pixel output. The resulting figures — a pixel fill rate of 201 GPixel/s, a texture rate of 482.3 GTexels/s, and 30.87 TFLOPS of single-precision floating-point performance — are therefore identical. The 30.87 TFLOPS figure is particularly relevant for AI-accelerated workloads and ray tracing, confirming both cards sit at the same computational tier. Memory bandwidth potential is also equal, with both running at 1750 MHz GPU memory speed.

On performance alone, there is no winner — these two cards are in a complete tie across every measurable metric in this category. A buyer choosing between them should look beyond raw performance figures, as differentiators will lie in cooling design, build quality, acoustics, and price rather than anything the GPU engine itself can offer.

Memory:
effective memory speed 28000 MHz 28000 MHz
maximum memory bandwidth 672 GB/s 672 GB/s
VRAM 12GB 12GB
GDDR version GDDR7 GDDR7
memory bus width 192-bit 192-bit
Supports ECC memory

The memory specifications for both the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III are identical across all listed aspects. Both products feature an effective memory speed of 28000 MHz, a maximum memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s, and 12GB of VRAM. They both also use GDDR7 memory and have a 192-bit memory bus width. Additionally, both models support ECC memory (Error-Correcting Code), ensuring data integrity during high-performance tasks.

Since all these memory-related specifications match between the two products, there is no difference in memory capabilities based on the provided data.

With identical memory configurations, both models are equally equipped for handling demanding workloads and high-speed data transfers.

Features:
DirectX version DirectX 12 Ultimate DirectX 12 Ultimate
OpenGL version 4.6 4.6
OpenCL version 3 3
Supports multi-display technology
supports ray tracing
Supports 3D
supports DLSS
has XeSS (XMX)
AMD SAM / Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR Intel Resizable BAR
has LHR
has RGB lighting
supported displays 4 4

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III are identical in terms of features. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and OpenCL 3. They also support multi-display technology, ray tracing, 3D, and DLSS. Neither product has XeSS (XMX), and both support Intel Resizable BAR (AMD SAM is not mentioned). Additionally, both models lack LHR (Lite Hash Rate) and feature RGB lighting.

Both products can support up to 4 displays, offering the same level of multi-monitor functionality.

Since all listed features are identical, there is no difference between the two products based on the provided specifications.

Ports:
has an HDMI output
HDMI ports 2 1
HDMI version HDMI 2.1b HDMI 2.1b
DisplayPort outputs 3 3
USB-C ports 0 0
DVI outputs 0 0
mini DisplayPort outputs 0 0

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III share some similarities but also have a key difference in their HDMI ports. Both models feature HDMI 2.1b outputs, but the Asus card has 2 HDMI ports, while the Gainward card has only 1 HDMI port. Both cards also include 3 DisplayPort outputs and lack USB-C, DVI, and mini DisplayPort outputs.

With the difference in the number of HDMI ports, the Asus model offers more flexibility for users who need multiple HDMI connections.

Other than the HDMI port count, the port configurations of both products are otherwise identical.

General info:
GPU architecture Blackwell Blackwell
release date January 2025 March 2025
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 250W 250W
PCI Express (PCIe) version 5 5
semiconductor size 5 nm 5 nm
number of transistors 31100 million 31100 million
Has air-water cooling
width 329 mm 291.9 mm
height 140 mm 116.5 mm

The Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III are identical in several key aspects, such as GPU architecture, thermal design power (TDP), PCIe version, semiconductor size, and the number of transistors. Both cards use the Blackwell architecture, have a TDP of 250W, support PCI Express version 5, utilize a 5 nm semiconductor size, and contain 31,100 million transistors. Neither card features air-water cooling.

The main difference between the two products is their physical dimensions. The Asus model is larger, with a width of 329 mm and a height of 140 mm, while the Gainward model is more compact, measuring 291.9 mm in width and 116.5 mm in height.

Overall, aside from the size difference, both cards share identical core specifications in terms of architecture and power requirements.

Comparison Summary & Verdict

After a thorough review, it is clear that the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 and the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III are virtually identical in raw performance, both delivering the same clock speeds, 30.87 TFLOPS of floating-point power, 12 GB of GDDR7 memory, and full support for ray tracing and DLSS. The real distinction lies in their physical profile and connectivity. The Asus TUF is the better pick for users who need dual HDMI outputs — ideal for multi-monitor setups mixing HDMI displays. The Gainward Python III, with its notably more compact dimensions of 291.9 mm x 116.5 mm versus 329 mm x 140 mm, is the smarter choice for builders working with tighter cases where clearance is a concern.

Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070
Buy Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 if...

Buy the Asus TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 5070 if you need two HDMI outputs to connect multiple HDMI-based displays simultaneously.

Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III
Buy Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III if...

Buy the Gainward GeForce RTX 5070 Python III if you have a compact case with limited space, as its smaller dimensions make it significantly easier to fit in tighter builds.