Asus VivoBook 16 16" VS Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6" (Core i7-13620H / 16GB RAM / 512GB)

When comparing the design of the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″, both share a similar approach in many ways, with a few notable differences. In terms of weight, the VivoBook 16 is slightly heavier at 1880 g, compared to the IdeaPad Slim 3’s 1620 g, making the latter the lighter of the two. Neither device features a fanless design, so both will generate some noise during operation. Both laptops also lack a backlit keyboard, which could be a drawback for those who frequently type in low-light environments.

In terms of size, the VivoBook 16 has a slightly larger footprint, with a width of 358 mm and a height of 249 mm, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 is narrower with a width of 359 mm and a shorter height of 235 mm. However, the VivoBook 16 is thicker at 19 mm, compared to the Slim 3’s more compact 17 mm. The volume of the VivoBook 16 is also larger at 1693.698 cm³, indicating it has a bulkier overall size compared to the IdeaPad Slim 3’s 1434.205 cm³.

Neither product is weather-sealed or rugged, so neither is built to withstand extreme conditions or splashes. In summary, while both laptops are similar in many aspects, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 is lighter and slightly more compact, while the Asus VivoBook 16 is bulkier and heavier but may offer a bit more screen space due to its larger size.

The display specifications of the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″ show some differences, although both displays offer solid features. The VivoBook 16 has a larger screen size of 16″ compared to the IdeaPad Slim 3’s 15.6″. In terms of resolution, both products offer full HD displays with a resolution of 1920 x 1080 px, though the orientation is reversed on the IdeaPad Slim 3 (1080 x 1920 px), meaning the resolution numbers are the same but the layout might slightly differ in terms of how content is rendered. The pixel density is close as well, with the VivoBook 16 having 137 ppi and the IdeaPad Slim 3 featuring 141 ppi, meaning the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a slightly higher pixel density, which could result in slightly sharper images.

Both laptops do not feature a touchscreen, so users will need to rely on the standard keyboard and trackpad for input. In terms of brightness, the VivoBook 16 offers a higher typical brightness of 300 nits, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 is slightly dimmer at 250 nits, which may impact visibility under bright lighting conditions. However, both laptops come with an anti-reflection coating, which should help in reducing glare and improving visibility in various lighting environments.

Overall, while the displays are quite similar, the VivoBook 16 offers a larger screen and higher brightness, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a slightly higher pixel density, providing a marginal advantage in clarity for its smaller display.

When comparing the performance specifications of the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″, there are a few key differences. The VivoBook 16 comes with 8GB of RAM, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has double the RAM at 16GB. Both devices use flash storage with the same internal storage capacity of 512GB, and both are equipped with an NVMe SSD for faster read and write speeds. The VivoBook 16’s CPU features 6 cores running at 2.3 GHz, with a turbo clock speed of 4.3 GHz, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a slightly higher CPU speed, with 6 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 4 additional cores at 1.8 GHz. The turbo clock speed on the IdeaPad Slim 3 is also higher at 4.9 GHz compared to the VivoBook 16’s 4.3 GHz.

The number of CPU threads also differs between the two laptops, with the VivoBook 16 having 12 threads and the IdeaPad Slim 3 having 16 threads, providing the IdeaPad with more multitasking capability. The VivoBook 16’s GPU turbo speed is 1800 MHz, which is higher than the IdeaPad Slim 3’s GPU turbo speed of 1500 MHz. The VivoBook 16 also features a PCI Express 3.0 version, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 3 supports the newer PCI Express 4.0, offering faster data transfer speeds.

Additionally, the VivoBook 16 has a maximum memory capacity of 64GB, which is significantly higher than the IdeaPad Slim 3’s maximum of 16GB. The VivoBook 16 uses DDR4 memory, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 uses the newer DDR5 version. Finally, the VivoBook 16’s semiconductor size is 7 nm, compared to the 10 nm size in the IdeaPad Slim 3. Both laptops support 64-bit architecture and multithreading, ensuring good overall performance for a variety of tasks.

When comparing the benchmark results of the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″, the IdeaPad Slim 3 shows significantly higher performance scores. The overall PassMark result for the VivoBook 16 is 15601, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 achieves a higher score of 23805. This indicates that the IdeaPad Slim 3 performs much better in overall processing power. The single-thread performance also differs, with the VivoBook 16 scoring 2948, compared to the IdeaPad Slim 3’s higher score of 3569, again showing a clear advantage for the Lenovo device in single-thread tasks.

Both products show solid benchmark results, but the IdeaPad Slim 3’s higher scores across both overall and single-thread tests indicate superior raw processing power. These differences likely stem from the additional CPU threads and slightly faster clock speeds in the IdeaPad Slim 3, as seen in the earlier performance specifications.

In summary, the IdeaPad Slim 3 outperforms the VivoBook 16 in both the overall PassMark score and single-thread performance, reflecting its higher processing capabilities.

When it comes to connectivity, the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″ offer several similar features, but there are some key differences. Both laptops have HDMI output with HDMI 1.4 support and AirPlay functionality. The VivoBook 16 lacks USB Type-C ports, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 includes one USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-C port. Additionally, the VivoBook 16 only has one USB 2.0 port, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 provides two USB 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A ports, which offer faster data transfer speeds. Neither laptop includes USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports or Thunderbolt support, with both also missing USB 4 or DisplayPort outputs.

For wireless connectivity, both laptops support Wi-Fi, with the VivoBook 16 supporting Wi-Fi 6E, Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 4, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 3 supports Wi-Fi 6, Wi-Fi 5, and Wi-Fi 4, but not the 6E standard. The Bluetooth versions also differ slightly, with the VivoBook 16 featuring Bluetooth 5.3 and the IdeaPad Slim 3 using Bluetooth 5.2.

One notable difference is that the IdeaPad Slim 3 has an external memory slot, while the VivoBook 16 does not. Additionally, the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a VGA connector, which the VivoBook 16 lacks. Both devices, however, do not feature RJ45 ports or mini DisplayPort outputs.

The battery specifications of the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″ show a few key differences. The VivoBook 16 comes with a 42 Wh battery, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 is equipped with a slightly larger 47 Wh battery. Both laptops lack a MagSafe power adapter, so users will need to rely on standard charging methods. However, the IdeaPad Slim 3 offers the added convenience of sleep-and-charge USB ports, which the VivoBook 16 does not include. This feature allows users to charge devices even when the laptop is in sleep mode, providing a bit more flexibility for charging accessories.

Overall, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 offers a slightly larger battery and additional functionality with its sleep-and-charge USB ports, while the Asus VivoBook 16 offers a smaller battery without that extra charging feature.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″ both come with stereo speakers and a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, ensuring standard audio connectivity. Neither laptop supports ray tracing or DLSS, nor do they feature Dolby Atmos sound technology. Both laptops lack a fingerprint scanner, 3D facial recognition, voice command functionality, and an S/PDIF Out port. The front camera is included on both devices, but neither has any advanced sensors such as a gyroscope, accelerometer, compass, or GPS.

One difference between the two is in the microphone setup. The VivoBook 16 has a single microphone, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 includes two microphones, potentially offering slightly better audio capture quality. Additionally, neither laptop includes an optical disc drive, so users needing such functionality will need to look elsewhere.

In summary, both laptops share many common features, including basic audio and camera functions, but the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a slight edge with its dual microphone setup.

In the miscellaneous specifications, the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3 Gen 8 15.6″ differ in several areas. The VivoBook 16 has 3 USB 3.0 ports, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 offers 3 USB ports in total, but none are USB 3.0. Both laptops lack Thunderbolt ports. The VivoBook 16 has a clock multiplier of 23, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a slightly higher multiplier of 24. The VivoBook 16 is equipped with an AMD Radeon Graphics GPU, with 7 GPU execution units, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has an Intel UHD Graphics 770 GPU with 64 GPU execution units, suggesting a significant difference in graphical capabilities.

Regarding CPU specifications, the VivoBook 16 has an L3 cache of 16 MB and an L2 cache of 3 MB, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 has a larger L3 cache of 24 MB and L2 cache of 9.5 MB. The VivoBook 16’s thermal design power (TDP) is 15W, which is lower than the IdeaPad Slim 3’s TDP of 45W, reflecting a higher power consumption in the Lenovo device. Additionally, the maximum RAM speed on the VivoBook 16 is 4267 MHz, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 supports a faster 5200 MHz RAM speed.

In terms of memory support, the VivoBook 16 supports ECC memory, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 does not. Both laptops use two memory channels, and both support the same OpenGL version (4.6), but the VivoBook 16 supports OpenCL version 2.2, while the IdeaPad Slim 3 supports the newer OpenCL version 3. The CPU temperature in the VivoBook 16 reaches 95°C, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 3 runs slightly hotter at 100°C.