Asus VivoBook 16 16" VS Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16"

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ have some similarities in their design, but they also show distinct differences. For instance, the Asus VivoBook 16 weighs 1880 g, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 is slightly lighter at 1760 g. Both models feature non-fanless designs, so neither has the benefit of completely silent operation.

In terms of dimensions, the VivoBook is 358 mm wide, 249 mm high, and 19 mm thick. Meanwhile, the IdeaPad Slim 5 is a bit wider at 365 mm, 250 mm high, but thinner at 16 mm. The VivoBook also has a larger overall volume of 1693.698 cm³ compared to the IdeaPad’s 1460 cm³, suggesting it’s slightly bulkier.

For key features, the Asus VivoBook 16 does not include a backlit keyboard, while the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 offers one. Neither product is weather-sealed or has a rugged build, making them both equally vulnerable to environmental factors.

Both the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ feature 16″ displays, but they differ in several key specifications. The VivoBook has a 1920 x 1080 px resolution, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 offers a higher 2880 x 1800 px resolution, providing a sharper display. This also contributes to the Lenovo's significantly higher pixel density of 212 ppi, compared to the VivoBook’s 137 ppi.

When it comes to display type, the VivoBook uses an LCD, LED-backlit, IPS panel, which is known for good color accuracy and wide viewing angles. On the other hand, the IdeaPad Slim 5 comes with an OLED/AMOLED display, which generally offers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors.

In terms of brightness, the VivoBook provides 300 nits, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 outshines it with 500 nits, making it potentially better suited for brighter environments. The refresh rate of the VivoBook is 60Hz, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 5 has a higher 120Hz refresh rate, which may provide smoother visuals in motion. The VivoBook does include an anti-reflection coating, but the IdeaPad Slim 5 does not have this feature.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ differ significantly in their performance specs. The VivoBook comes with 8GB of RAM, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 has 32GB, providing a clear difference in memory size. The VivoBook’s internal storage is 512GB, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 5 offers double the storage at 1024GB. Both products use flash storage and feature NVMe SSDs for fast data access.

When it comes to the CPU, the VivoBook has a 6-core processor running at 2.3 GHz, with a turbo clock speed of 4.3GHz and a total of 12 threads. The IdeaPad Slim 5, on the other hand, has a more complex 8-core CPU, divided into 4 cores running at 2.0 GHz and 4 at 2.0 GHz, along with a turbo clock speed of 5GHz and 16 threads. The IdeaPad Slim 5 thus offers a more powerful multi-core configuration.

The VivoBook’s GPU turbo speed is 1800 MHz, while the IdeaPad Slim 5’s is significantly higher at 3000 MHz, indicating potentially better graphics performance. Additionally, the VivoBook has 1 memory slot and uses DDR4 memory, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 has 2 memory slots and uses DDR5 memory, which is generally faster. The VivoBook uses PCIe version 3, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 supports PCIe version 4, offering better bandwidth for data transfer. Lastly, the VivoBook uses a 7nm semiconductor, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 uses a more advanced 4nm semiconductor.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ show significant differences in their benchmark scores. The VivoBook has a PassMark result of 15601, with a single-core PassMark result of 2948. In comparison, the IdeaPad Slim 5 has a much higher overall PassMark score of 34459, and its single-core result is 3878. This indicates that the IdeaPad Slim 5 performs substantially better in both overall processing power and single-core tasks.

These differences in PassMark scores reflect a clear performance gap between the two devices. The higher single-core score of the IdeaPad Slim 5 suggests that it is likely to handle tasks that rely on strong single-threaded performance more efficiently.

Overall, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 appears to outperform the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ in these benchmark tests, both in terms of total processing power and single-core capabilities.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ both offer solid connectivity options, but there are notable differences. The VivoBook lacks any USB Type-C or Thunderbolt ports, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 includes two USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C ports, offering more versatile connectivity. Both models feature HDMI outputs, with the VivoBook supporting HDMI 1.4 and the IdeaPad Slim 5 supporting the newer HDMI 2.1. Both laptops also offer Bluetooth, but the VivoBook uses version 5.3, whereas the IdeaPad Slim 5 includes the slightly newer version 5.4.

In terms of Wi-Fi support, both laptops support Wi-Fi 6E and Wi-Fi 6, but the IdeaPad Slim 5 goes a step further with Wi-Fi 7, which is a newer and faster standard. The VivoBook does not include an external memory slot, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 does, providing more flexibility for additional storage. Neither product has an RJ45 port, mini DisplayPort outputs, or a VGA connector.

Lastly, both products support AirPlay, offering wireless streaming to compatible devices, but the key differences lie in the USB and wireless connectivity options, with the IdeaPad Slim 5 being more advanced in these areas.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ have some differences in their battery specifications. The VivoBook is equipped with a 42 Wh battery, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 offers a much larger 80 Wh battery, potentially providing longer usage time.

Both laptops lack a MagSafe power adapter, so neither includes the convenience of magnetic charging. The IdeaPad Slim 5 does, however, have sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing it to charge devices while the laptop is in sleep mode. In contrast, the VivoBook does not feature this capability.

In summary, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 has a larger battery and additional charging functionality, while the VivoBook has a smaller battery with no sleep-and-charge feature.

Both the Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ come with stereo speakers and a 3.5 mm audio jack socket, making them suitable for basic audio needs. However, the IdeaPad Slim 5 features two microphones, while the VivoBook has just one microphone. Additionally, the IdeaPad Slim 5 supports 3D facial recognition, a feature the VivoBook does not have.

Neither laptop supports ray tracing or DLSS, nor do they have Dolby Atmos sound or include a stylus. Both models also lack a fingerprint scanner and an S/PDIF Out port. The VivoBook does not support voice commands, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 does not either, though it offers slightly more advanced voice control capabilities through its dual microphones.

Neither device has a gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, or compass, and both lack an optical disc drive. The key differences are the number of microphones and the inclusion of 3D facial recognition in the IdeaPad Slim 5.

The Asus VivoBook 16 16″ and Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 5 Gen 10 16″ feature different specifications in their miscellaneous features. The VivoBook has a clock multiplier of 23, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 has a lower multiplier of 20. Both devices support MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2 instruction sets. However, the VivoBook’s L2 cache is 3 MB, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 has a larger 8 MB L2 cache. Both laptops have 16 MB of L3 cache.

In terms of integrated graphics, the VivoBook uses AMD Radeon Graphics with 7 GPU execution units, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 uses Radeon 860M with 8 GPU execution units. The VivoBook supports ECC memory, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 does not.

The VivoBook supports RAM speeds of up to 4267 MHz, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 supports higher RAM speeds of up to 8000 MHz. The CPU temperatures are reported as 95 °C for the VivoBook and 100 °C for the IdeaPad Slim 5, with the IdeaPad having a higher Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W compared to the VivoBook’s 15W. Finally, the VivoBook does not use big.LITTLE technology, while the IdeaPad Slim 5 does.