Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) 16" VS Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) 14"

The Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) share some design similarities, but they also have notable differences. Both are categorized as productivity laptops, featuring a backlit keyboard, which is common to both models. Neither device uses a fanless design, and neither is weather-sealed or has a rugged build.

In terms of dimensions, the VivoBook 16 is larger, with a width of 357 mm, height of 250 mm, and thickness of 17 mm. In comparison, the VivoBook S 14 is more compact, measuring 315 mm in width, 223 mm in height, and 18 mm in thickness. The VivoBook 16 also has a larger overall volume of 1517.25 cm³, while the VivoBook S 14 has a smaller volume of 1264.41 cm³.

When it comes to weight, the VivoBook 16 is heavier, weighing 1880 g, compared to the VivoBook S 14, which is lighter at 1390 g. This weight difference may affect portability for users who need a lighter device.

The Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) have similar display specifications, though there are some differences. Both have a resolution of 1920 x 1200 px, ensuring clear visuals. However, the VivoBook 16 features a pixel density of 141 ppi, while the VivoBook S 14 offers a slightly higher pixel density of 161 ppi, which may result in crisper details on the smaller screen.

In terms of screen size, the VivoBook 16 comes with a larger 16″ display, compared to the 14″ display on the VivoBook S 14. Both devices support up to 4 external displays, and both have a 60Hz refresh rate, so there's no difference in fluidity between the two models.

The VivoBook 16 has an anti-reflection coating on its screen, which could help reduce glare in bright environments, whereas the VivoBook S 14 lacks this feature. Neither device has a touch screen, so both are strictly traditional laptop displays.

The performance specs of the Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) are quite similar, but there are some key differences. Both models come with 32GB of RAM and 1024GB of flash storage, and both use an NVMe SSD. They support multithreading and have a 64-bit architecture, with DirectX 12 support. The memory version is DDR5 in both laptops, and they both use PCI Express (PCIe) version 4.

When it comes to CPU performance, the VivoBook 16 has a processor with a speed of 4 x 2 GHz and 4 x 2 GHz, totaling 16 threads. In contrast, the VivoBook S 14 has a faster 8 x 4 GHz CPU, also with 16 threads. The turbo clock speed on the VivoBook 16 is 5GHz, while the VivoBook S 14 has a slightly higher turbo clock speed of 5.2GHz.

For the GPU, the VivoBook 16 has a clock speed of 400 MHz, while the VivoBook S 14 has a faster GPU clock speed of 800 MHz. However, the GPU turbo speed is higher on the VivoBook 16 at 3000 MHz, compared to 2800 MHz on the VivoBook S 14. Both laptops feature a 4 nm semiconductor size, but neither includes XeSS (XMX) support.

The Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) show some differences in benchmark results. The VivoBook 16 has a PassMark result of 34459, while the VivoBook S 14 has a lower result of 31104. This indicates that the VivoBook 16 generally performs better in overall multi-core tasks.

For single-core performance, the VivoBook S 14 slightly outperforms the VivoBook 16 with a PassMark result of 3970 compared to 3878. While the difference is not very large, it indicates that the VivoBook S 14 may have a small advantage in tasks that rely more heavily on single-core processing.

In summary, the VivoBook 16 excels in overall multi-core performance, while the VivoBook S 14 has a marginally better single-core benchmark result.

The connectivity features of the Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) are quite similar, with both offering a range of USB ports and wireless capabilities. Both models have 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-C) and 2 USB 3.2 Gen 1 ports (USB-A), but neither includes USB 3.2 Gen 2 or USB 4 ports. Both devices also feature USB Type-C ports, though neither offers Thunderbolt 3 or Thunderbolt 4 support.

Both laptops are equipped with HDMI outputs (1 port), and they support HDMI 2.1. The VivoBook 16 and the VivoBook S 14 also share the same Wi-Fi capabilities, supporting Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac), and Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n). Bluetooth 5.3 is supported on both devices as well, and neither has RJ45 ports or DisplayPort outputs. Additionally, neither laptop includes a VGA connector or mini DisplayPort outputs.

The VivoBook 16 and the VivoBook S 14 both support AirPlay, and neither has an external memory slot. Overall, their connectivity options are nearly identical, with both laptops offering the same key features in this category.

Both the Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) offer the same battery-related features. Both laptops have sleep-and-charge USB ports, allowing users to charge devices even when the laptop is in sleep mode. Neither model includes a MagSafe power adapter, so they do not feature the magnetic charging connector typically seen on certain other devices.

In summary, there are no differences in the battery-related features between the two models; both offer the same capabilities in this category.

The Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) offer identical features in several areas. Both have stereo speakers, a socket for a 3.5 mm audio jack, and a front camera. They also feature 3D facial recognition for secure login and use one microphone. Neither laptop supports ray tracing, DLSS, or Dolby Atmos, and neither includes a stylus or fingerprint scanner. Additionally, both models lack voice command capabilities and an S/PDIF Out port.

Neither laptop is equipped with a gyroscope, GPS, accelerometer, or compass. Both models also do not include an optical disc drive. Therefore, when it comes to features, the two devices are identical across the board.

The Asus VivoBook 16 (M1607) and the Asus VivoBook S 14 (M3407) have several differences in their miscellaneous specifications. The VivoBook 16 features a clock multiplier of 20, while the VivoBook S 14 has a higher clock multiplier of 40. The number of render output units (ROPs) is also different, with the VivoBook 16 having 8 ROPs and the VivoBook S 14 offering 32 ROPs. Similarly, the VivoBook 16 has 32 texture mapping units (TMUs), while the VivoBook S 14 has 48 TMUs, and the VivoBook 16 has 512 shading units compared to the VivoBook S 14's 768 shading units.

Both models support OpenGL version 4.6 and OpenCL version 2.1, and both have instruction sets including MMX, F16C, FMA3, AES, AVX, AVX2, SSE 4.1, and SSE 4.2. Neither laptop features an unlocked multiplier. Both laptops also have an NX bit and 16 MB of L3 cache, as well as 8 MB of L2 cache. Both devices feature integrated graphics, though the specific GPU differs: the VivoBook 16 uses a Radeon 860M, while the VivoBook S 14 uses a Radeon 780M.

Both models use two memory channels, but the VivoBook 16 supports a higher RAM speed of 8000 MHz, compared to the VivoBook S 14's 7500 MHz. The CPU temperature is the same for both models, maxing out at 100°C. The VivoBook 16 has a Thermal Design Power (TDP) of 28W, while the VivoBook S 14 has a higher TDP of 45W. Finally, the VivoBook 16 utilizes big.LITTLE technology, whereas the VivoBook S 14 does not.