Baseus Inspire XC1 VS Beyerdynamic Amiron 200

The Baseus Inspire XC1 and the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 both feature an open-ear design, providing a similar fit for users. However, their water resistance ratings differ. The Baseus Inspire XC1 comes with an IP66 rating, which suggests it is more resistant to dust and water, offering better protection overall compared to the Amiron 200, which has an IP54 rating and is only sweat resistant.

When it comes to additional features, the Baseus Inspire XC1 does not include wingtips, while the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 does, which may provide a more secure fit for certain users. Neither product includes RGB lighting or UV light, and both have stereo speakers, making them similar in terms of audio features. Neither also offers a display.

Both products are wireless, with no wires or cables, and neither are neckband earbuds. The Baseus Inspire XC1, however, does not include any wingtips, unlike the Amiron 200. Overall, the Baseus Inspire XC1 offers superior water resistance, while the Amiron 200 provides additional fit options with its wingtips.

The Baseus Inspire XC1 and Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 share identical specifications in terms of sound quality. Both products do not feature active noise cancellation (ANC) or passive noise reduction, meaning they do not offer noise-blocking capabilities. Additionally, neither supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, nor Dirac Virtuo, which means neither has advanced audio technologies for enhanced immersive sound.

In terms of frequency range, both the Baseus Inspire XC1 and the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 are the same, with a lowest frequency of 20 Hz and a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz, ensuring a wide range of sound reproduction. Both products also lack a neodymium magnet, a component often associated with high-end sound reproduction.

Overall, the sound quality specifications of both products are identical, with no distinguishing features in terms of noise cancellation, audio technologies, or magnet types.

The Baseus Inspire XC1 and Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 have similar power features, with both offering rechargeable batteries. They share the same charge time of 1.5 hours and both include a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily monitor remaining power. However, their battery lives differ slightly. The Baseus Inspire XC1 offers 8 hours of battery life on a full charge, whereas the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 provides a slightly longer 11 hours.

In terms of the charging case, the Baseus Inspire XC1 offers a total of 32 hours of additional battery life from the case, while the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 provides 25 hours. Neither product supports wireless charging or features a solar power battery, making their charging methods the same in this regard.

While both products have similar charging and battery features, the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 provides a slightly longer battery life, both in terms of individual usage and total battery life with the charging case.

Both the Baseus Inspire XC1 and Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 feature USB Type-C for charging, ensuring fast and modern connectivity. They both also support AAC audio codec, but differ in Bluetooth versions. The Baseus Inspire XC1 uses Bluetooth version 6.1, while the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 uses an older Bluetooth version 5.3, which could impact things like connection stability and range.

Speaking of range, the Baseus Inspire XC1 has a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters, while the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 offers a longer range of 15 meters. Both products support wireless use and do not have NFC Bluetooth pairing capability.

In terms of additional features, the Baseus Inspire XC1 supports LDAC for high-quality wireless audio, while the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 lacks this support. Neither product includes fast pairing, Bluetooth LE Audio, or aptX codecs, such as aptX Adaptive or aptX HD, and neither has Auracast functionality.

The Baseus Inspire XC1 and Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 share a number of common features. Both products support fast charging, include a travel bag, and can be used as a headset. They also feature a mute function, voice prompts, and a control panel placed on a device, allowing for easy management of functions. Neither product has ambient sound mode, built-in translator, or a built-in camera remote control function. Additionally, neither includes an in-line control panel or a temperature sensor.

Overall, the features of both products are almost identical, with no significant differences between them. Both offer the same basic functionalities like fast charging and headset use, along with similar user interface elements like voice prompts and mute functions.

Thus, there are no distinguishing feature differences between the Baseus Inspire XC1 and the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 in this category.

The Baseus Inspire XC1 and Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 are identical in terms of their microphone setup. Both products feature four microphones and are equipped with noise-canceling microphones, ensuring clear communication by reducing background noise.

There are no differences between the two products in this category, as both have the same number of microphones and the same noise-canceling functionality.

Overall, the microphone specifications for both the Baseus Inspire XC1 and the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 are exactly the same.