Baseus MC1 Pro VS QCY Crossky C50

Both the Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 offer an open-ear fit, providing comfort without blocking out external sounds. The Baseus model is rated IP67 for ingress protection, making it both waterproof and more resistant to dust and debris. In contrast, the QCY Crossky C50 has a slightly lower rating of IPX5, which means it is water-resistant but not fully waterproof like the Baseus model.

Both products are wireless, with no cables, and neither includes wingtips. Additionally, neither model features RGB lighting or a UV light, and neither has a display. Both have stereo speakers for audio output.

In terms of water protection, the Baseus MC1 Pro stands out with its higher waterproof rating, while the QCY Crossky C50 provides a solid water resistance level with its IPX5 rating.

The Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 both lack active noise cancellation (ANC) and passive noise reduction, so neither offers enhanced isolation from external sounds. They also both support a frequency range starting at 20 Hz, ensuring deep bass frequencies, but they differ in their high-frequency response. The Baseus model has a broader range, reaching up to 40,000 Hz, while the QCY model is limited to 20,000 Hz, potentially offering less high-frequency clarity.

Neither product supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, or Dirac Virtuo, and neither uses a neodymium magnet in its speaker drivers. These features are absent in both models, so sound quality differences will likely be limited to the frequency range and basic driver characteristics.

Overall, the most notable difference in sound quality specs is the higher maximum frequency of the Baseus MC1 Pro, which may result in a slightly richer sound experience in the treble range compared to the QCY Crossky C50.

The Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 both offer a similar battery life, with the Baseus providing 8 hours of use and the QCY offering slightly more at 8.5 hours. The charging cases for both models provide additional power, with the Baseus MC1 Pro supporting 32 hours of total use and the QCY Crossky C50 offering 27.5 hours, which is a bit less.

Both models take 1.5 hours to charge fully, and neither supports wireless charging or features a solar power battery. However, both products have a rechargeable battery and a battery level indicator, allowing users to easily monitor their remaining power.

Overall, the Baseus model has a longer total battery life due to its more powerful charging case, while the QCY model offers a slightly longer individual battery life per charge.

Both the Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 feature USB Type-C ports for charging and Bluetooth version 6 for connectivity. Neither product supports fast pairing or Bluetooth pairing using NFC.

In terms of audio codecs, the Baseus MC1 Pro supports LDAC and AAC, while the QCY Crossky C50 only supports AAC. The Baseus model also offers a maximum Bluetooth range of 10 meters, which is the same as the QCY Crossky C50. Both products can be used wirelessly, but neither supports Bluetooth LE Audio or any of the aptX variations like aptX Adaptive, aptX Low Latency, or aptX HD.

Overall, the main difference between these two models in connectivity is that the Baseus MC1 Pro offers LDAC support, while the QCY Crossky C50 does not.

The Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 share identical features in this group. Both models lack ambient sound mode and in/on-ear detection, and neither can read notifications. Both support fast charging, have a mute function, and can be used as a headset. Additionally, both have a control panel placed on a device and offer voice prompts. A travel bag is included with each product, and neither has an in-line control panel, temperature sensor, or built-in camera remote control function.

Given that all these features are the same between the two models, there are no differences in functionality in this group.

Both the Baseus MC1 Pro and the QCY Crossky C50 are equipped with a noise-canceling microphone. This feature is present in both products, so there is no difference in microphone capabilities between them in this group.

As both models offer the same microphone feature, users can expect similar performance in terms of minimizing background noise during calls or recordings.