Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 VS Beyerdynamic Amiron Zero

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Beyerdynamic Amiron Zero feature an open-ear fit, providing a similar wearing experience for users. In terms of ingress protection, both models have an IP54 rating, indicating they are protected from dust ingress and can handle water splashes, making them suitable for sweat-resistant use.

The Amiron 200 is slightly heavier at 20.4 g, while the Amiron Zero is lighter at 12 g, which may contribute to a more comfortable and less noticeable fit during extended use.

When it comes to design features, the Amiron 200 includes wingtips, offering additional stability, while the Amiron Zero does not have this feature. Both models are wireless and do not include any cables, nor are they neckband earbuds. Neither product features RGB lighting, UV light, or a display, keeping their designs focused on functionality over flashy extras.

In terms of sound quality, both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Amiron Zero offer similar specifications. Neither product includes active noise cancellation (ANC) or passive noise reduction, meaning they may not provide as much isolation from external noise compared to some other models. Both have the same frequency range, with a lowest frequency of 20 Hz and a highest frequency of 20000 Hz, covering the full range of human hearing.

Neither the Amiron 200 nor the Amiron Zero supports spatial audio, Dolby Atmos, or Dirac Virtuo, so users will not experience these advanced audio features with either product.

Additionally, both products lack a neodymium magnet, which could be relevant for users who are considering magnetic driver performance, though this feature is absent in both models.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Amiron Zero differ in terms of battery life and charging capabilities. The Amiron 200 offers a longer battery life of 11 hours, compared to the Amiron Zero's 6 hours. However, the charging case for the Amiron 200 provides 25 hours of additional battery life, whereas the Amiron Zero's charging case provides 14 hours.

When it comes to charging time, the Amiron Zero charges slightly faster, taking 1 hour, while the Amiron 200 requires 1.5 hours to fully charge. Neither product supports wireless charging, nor do they feature solar power batteries.

Both models have a rechargeable battery and include a battery level indicator, so users can easily monitor their power status. These features are shared across both products, ensuring similar user experiences in terms of battery management.

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Amiron Zero feature USB Type-C connectivity, allowing for fast and modern charging. In terms of Bluetooth, the Amiron 200 uses Bluetooth version 5.3, while the Amiron Zero supports the slightly newer Bluetooth version 5.4. Despite this difference, both models can be used wirelessly and support AAC for high-quality audio streaming.

Neither model supports advanced Bluetooth features such as LDAC, LDHC, Bluetooth LE Audio, or aptX variants (including aptX Adaptive, aptX Low Latency, aptX HD, aptX, aptX Lossless, and aptX Voice), nor do they support Auracast for enhanced audio experiences.

Regarding Bluetooth range, the Amiron 200 has a longer maximum range of 15 m, compared to the Amiron Zero’s 10 m. Both products do not support Bluetooth pairing using NFC.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Amiron Zero share several key features, including support for fast charging, a mute function, the ability to be used as a headset, control panels placed on the device, and voice prompts. Both models also come with a travel bag, ensuring easy portability. Neither product features ambient sound mode, a built-in translator, an in-line control panel, a temperature sensor, or a built-in camera remote control function.

Both products also offer the same functionality in terms of reading notifications, which they do not support. These specifications are identical across both models, providing a similar user experience in terms of features and functionality.

Both the Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and Amiron Zero are equipped with 4 microphones, providing similar microphone capabilities. Additionally, both models feature a noise-canceling microphone, which helps reduce background noise for clearer communication during calls or recordings.

Since the microphone specifications are identical for both products, users can expect the same microphone performance from either model.