Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 VS JBL Sense Pro

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro both feature sweat resistance and an IP54 ingress protection rating, making them well-suited for outdoor and active use. However, the Amiron 200 has an open-ear fit, while the Sense Pro offers an in-ear fit. This difference could affect comfort and sound isolation, with the Amiron 200 likely providing a more open listening experience compared to the more secure in-ear fit of the Sense Pro.

In terms of weight, the Amiron 200 is lighter at 20.4 g, compared to the 23.2 g of the Sense Pro. Both products are wireless and do not feature neckbands. The Amiron 200 includes wingtips for added stability, which the Sense Pro lacks. Both products have stereo speakers, but neither offers RGB lighting, UV light, or a display.

Overall, the design features of both products are quite similar, with the main differences being the fit type, inclusion of wingtips, and weight. The Sense Pro’s in-ear fit may offer a more secure hold for active users, while the Amiron 200’s open-ear design might appeal to those seeking a more natural, open sound experience.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro differ in several sound quality features. Neither product includes active noise cancellation (ANC), though the Sense Pro does offer passive noise reduction, which the Amiron 200 lacks. Both products have a similar frequency range for low-end sound, with the Amiron 200 reaching down to 20 Hz, matching the Sense Pro's lower limit. However, the Sense Pro extends its high-frequency response up to 40,000 Hz, while the Amiron 200 stops at 20,000 Hz, potentially offering a broader range of high-end detail in the Sense Pro.

Neither product supports spatial audio or includes Dolby Atmos, and both lack Dirac Virtuo technology. Additionally, neither uses a neodymium magnet, so both products likely rely on different methods for driver construction. These specifications indicate that both headphones focus on solid, traditional sound performance without the added benefits of advanced audio technologies like spatial audio or high-end driver magnets.

In summary, while both the Amiron 200 and Sense Pro deliver solid sound quality, the Sense Pro stands out with its broader high-frequency range and passive noise reduction. The Amiron 200, however, may appeal to users who prioritize a more standard frequency response without the need for extra high-end extension.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro both feature rechargeable batteries and battery level indicators, making them easy to monitor during use. The Amiron 200 offers 11 hours of battery life, with an additional 25 hours available through its charging case. In contrast, the Sense Pro provides 8 hours of battery life, but its charging case extends the total usage time to 30 hours. This gives the Sense Pro a slight edge in overall case battery life.

When it comes to charging time, the Amiron 200 takes 1.5 hours to fully charge, while the Sense Pro requires 2 hours. However, the Sense Pro supports wireless charging, a feature that the Amiron 200 lacks. Both products are powered by rechargeable batteries, and neither includes solar power for charging.

In summary, the Amiron 200 excels in shorter charge times and longer individual battery life, but the Sense Pro offers longer total battery life through its case and adds wireless charging for added convenience.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro share some key connectivity features but also have notable differences. Both products support USB Type-C charging and can be used wirelessly. Neither has fast pairing capabilities or supports Bluetooth pairing via NFC. The Amiron 200 uses Bluetooth 5.3, while the Sense Pro uses Bluetooth 6, offering a newer Bluetooth version in the latter.

In terms of Bluetooth range, the Amiron 200 has a maximum range of 15 meters, which is greater than the Sense Pro's 10-meter range. Both products lack support for high-definition audio codecs like LDAC, LDHC, or aptX series codecs (including Adaptive, Low Latency, HD, Lossless, and Voice), and neither supports Bluetooth LE Audio or Auracast.

Additionally, the Amiron 200 supports AAC, while the Sense Pro does not, which could impact audio quality when using certain devices that prioritize AAC for streaming. Overall, the Amiron 200 offers a longer Bluetooth range and AAC support, while the Sense Pro benefits from the newer Bluetooth version.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro are quite similar in terms of features, with both offering a set of practical capabilities. Neither product includes an ambient sound mode or a temperature sensor, and neither can read notifications or act as a built-in translator. Both also support fast charging, include voice prompts, and have a mute function. Additionally, both can be used as a headset, feature a control panel placed on a device, and come with a travel bag.

One notable area where they are identical is in the absence of an in-line control panel or a built-in camera remote control function. Both products share these limitations, making the control system depend more on the device rather than integrated, physical controls.

In summary, the Amiron 200 and Sense Pro offer nearly identical feature sets, with both supporting fast charging, voice prompts, and basic headset functionality. Their differences in this category are minimal, with no significant advantages for either product in terms of additional features.

The Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 and JBL Sense Pro are identical in terms of their microphone specifications. Both products feature four microphones and are equipped with noise-canceling technology, which should help ensure clearer voice capture by reducing background noise during use.

With matching microphone configurations, there are no differences between the two products in terms of microphone capabilities or features. Both are designed to offer effective communication performance with their noise-canceling microphones.

In summary, the microphone features are the same for both the Amiron 200 and Sense Pro, making them equal in this regard when it comes to voice clarity and noise reduction.